TCEHY vs NTES Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
TCEHY (Tencent) is the world's largest gaming company with WeChat as a distribution superpower and a massive global gaming investment portfolio, while NTES (NetEase) is China's focused #2 gaming developer creating original games for Chinese and global audiences plus NetEase Cloud Music. Tencent is larger and more diversified; NetEase is a purer gaming development play.
TCEHY vs NTES is gaming conglomerate with WeChat super-app distribution (Tencent) versus focused Chinese gaming developer building international franchises (NetEase) — both subject to Chinese gaming regulation but with very different scale, diversification, and international ambition.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want China's largest technology company with WeChat super-app, gaming franchise, fintech (WeChat Pay), and a massive global technology investment portfolio
- Value Tencent's WeChat distribution power as an unmatched launch platform for gaming titles in China with 1.3+ billion users
- Prefer the diversification of Tencent's conglomerate model (social, gaming, fintech, cloud, global investments) over a focused gaming pure-play
- Want a focused Chinese gaming developer with original game development capabilities and growing international gaming ambition through titles like Naraka: Bladepoint
- Value NetEase Cloud Music as an additional revenue stream from China's large music streaming market alongside the core gaming business
- See NetEase's smaller size versus Tencent as offering more concentrated upside if its game development pipeline outperforms expectations
| Metric | TCEHY | NTES |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | N/A | N/A |
| AI ranki | N/A | N/A |
| Latest closei | N/A | N/A |
| Metric | TCEHY | NTES |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | N/A | N/A |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | N/A | N/A |
| Analyst targeti | N/A | N/A |
| Target upsidei | N/A | N/A |
| Metric | TCEHY | NTES |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | N/A | N/A |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | N/A | N/A |
| Operating margini | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margini | N/A | N/A |
| ROIC proxyi | N/A | N/A |
| Return on equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | N/A | N/A |
| Debt/equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Current ratioi | N/A | N/A |
| Quick ratioi | N/A | N/A |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | TCEHY | NTES |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| 5Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| 10Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A |
| Category | TCEHY | NTES |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Tencent Holdings Limited | NetEase, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology - Gaming, Social Media & Fintech | Technology - Gaming & Online Music |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | Tencent is China's largest technology company, operating WeChat (China's dominant messaging and payment super-app), online gaming (League of Legends through Riot Games, Brawl Stars through Supercell, Call of Duty Mobile, and major Chinese titles), fintech (WeChat Pay), cloud, and media businesses. | NetEase is China's second-largest gaming company, developing and operating online games in China (Fantasy Westward Journey, Naraka: Bladepoint) and increasingly internationally, plus operating NetEase Cloud Music (a major Chinese music streaming platform) and e-learning services. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Tencent's gaming revenue (domestic China and international through portfolio investments), WeChat monetization (advertising, mini-programs, payments), cloud and business services growth, and the diversified investment portfolio spanning global technology companies. | Investors track NetEase's gaming revenue and new game pipeline, NetEase Cloud Music subscription growth and monetization, international game expansion results, and the company's ability to maintain profitable operations while investing in global game development. |
- World's largest gaming company by revenue through a combination of owned studios (Riot Games, Supercell) and China's dominant gaming platform for publishers distributing through WeChat
- WeChat's 1.3+ billion users create an unparalleled captive distribution channel for games, where Tencent can launch gaming titles with immediate access to all Chinese smartphone users
- Massive diversified investment portfolio in global technology companies (Snapchat, Epic Games, Ubisoft stakes) provides indirect exposure to global gaming and internet trends
- Strong game development capabilities — NetEase has developed original gaming IP (Fantasy Westward Journey, Naraka: Bladepoint) that has achieved success both in China and internationally
- NetEase Cloud Music is a significant music streaming platform in China with hundreds of millions of monthly active users, providing a non-gaming revenue diversification
- International game expansion — Naraka: Bladepoint on Steam demonstrated NetEase can build games that succeed with global (non-Chinese) audiences
- Chinese gaming regulations requiring real-name registration and limiting gaming hours for minors have structurally reduced the growth rate of China's gaming market
- WeChat's ubiquity creates regulatory risk — the Chinese government has shown willingness to constrain dominant technology platforms that accumulate too much social and economic power
- Global gaming market is highly competitive with Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, Activision, EA, and Take-Two — Tencent's owned studios must compete for developers and IP globally
- NetEase relies on Blizzard Entertainment (World of Warcraft, Diablo) publishing rights for Chinese distribution — the temporary suspension of their Blizzard publishing partnership in 2023 demonstrated license concentration risk
- New game pipeline execution is critical — unlike Tencent's diversified investment approach, NetEase's success depends on its own studio output
- Chinese gaming regulatory environment affects both Tencent and NetEase equally — game approval queues and content restrictions create timing uncertainty for new title launches
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on TCEHY and NTES. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside TCEHY and NTES, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.