ROOT vs LMND: Root Insurance vs Lemonade Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Root Insurance uses telematics data to price auto insurance risk more accurately for good drivers, while Lemonade is an AI-powered multi-line digital insurer with a brand-differentiated charity giveback model. Both are insurtech challengers with improving but still elevated loss ratios, competing against much better-capitalized incumbents.
ROOT vs LMND is telematics-driven auto insurance underwriting accuracy versus AI-powered multi-line digital insurance with brand differentiation — Root wins if telematics pricing creates sustained underwriting profitability; Lemonade wins if multi-line cross-selling and AI claims processing drive eventual underwriting improvement.
LMND holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. LMND has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-12.56% vs -36.43%), though ROOT has the better forward P/E setup (19.46x vs -61.25x for LMND). On fundamentals, LMND is growing revenue faster (79.40%), while ROOT maintains the higher operating margin (8.89%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies similar upside for both: +9.71% for ROOT and +11.13% for LMND.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- believe telematics-driven underwriting will produce structurally better auto loss ratios than incumbents
- want focused auto insurance exposure with a clear differentiated data advantage
- prefer Root's simpler single-line insurance model vs Lemonade's complex multi-line expansion
- are comfortable with the capital-intensive competitive dynamics of auto insurance vs incumbents
- prefer Lemonade's multi-line digital platform with cross-sell potential across renters, home, auto, and life
- value Lemonade's brand-differentiated giveback model as a customer loyalty advantage
- believe AI claims processing will eventually drive meaningful cost structure improvement
- are comfortable with elevated loss ratios and cash burn during Lemonade's growth phase
| Metric | ROOT | LMND |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 23.2 | 25.0 |
| AI ranki | #3673 | #2785 |
| Latest closei | $50.53 | $45.86 |
| 1M returni | -5.73% | -7.80% |
| 3M returni | -14.98% | -28.98% |
| 6M returni | -2.36% | -33.03% |
| 1Y returni | -36.43% | -12.56% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | ROOT | LMND |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $6.36K (-36.4%) started 2025-10-15 | $8.74K (-12.6%) started 2025-10-15 |
| 5Y ago | $5.53K (-44.7%) started 2021-10-15 | $7.01K (-29.9%) started 2021-10-15 |
| 10Y ago | $1.04K (-89.6%) started 2020-10-28 | $6.61K (-33.9%) started 2020-07-02 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | ROOT | LMND |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $850.11M | $4.12B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 15.33 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 19.46 | -61.25 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 0.41 | 3.92 |
| Analyst targeti | $60.20 | $59.22 |
| Target upsidei | +9.71% | +11.13% |
| Metric | ROOT | LMND |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 1.60% | 79.40% |
| Earnings growthi | 15.50% | N/A |
| EPS growthi | +15.50% | N/A |
| FCF margini | +7.98% | +9.68% |
| Operating margini | 8.89% | -11.82% |
| Profit margini | 3.71% | -14.19% |
| ROIC proxyi | 15.37% | -26.96% |
| Return on equityi | 15.37% | -26.96% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 2.93 | 1.86 |
| Debt/equityi | 44.97 | 45.33 |
| Current ratioi | 1.98 | 1.19 |
| Quick ratioi | 1.64 | 0.91 |
Over the past year, ROOT and LMND have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.50), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | ROOT | LMND |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -36.43% | -12.56% |
| CAGRi | -36.45% | -12.57% | |
| Volatilityi | 65.08% | 79.22% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.44 | 0.16 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.60 | 0.24 | |
| Max drawdowni | 52.44% | 54.58% | |
| Current drawdowni | 44.39% | 52.51% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 32.95% | 30.10% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 35.93% | 34.94% | |
| Max daily dropi | 16.21% | 23.72% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 20.31% | 25.29% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -44.74% | -29.93% |
| CAGRi | -11.19% | -6.87% | |
| Volatilityi | 101.48% | 82.80% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.31 | 0.26 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.53 | 0.41 | |
| Max drawdowni | 96.67% | 85.33% | |
| Current drawdowni | 71.56% | 52.51% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 63.37% | 57.77% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 68.67% | 61.92% | |
| Max daily dropi | 26.37% | 27.72% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 36.32% | 31.37% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -89.60% | -33.93% |
| CAGRi | -31.59% | -6.38% | |
| Volatilityi | 98.33% | 84.16% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.03 | 0.28 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.04 | 0.44 | |
| Max drawdowni | 99.29% | 94.23% | |
| Current drawdowni | 89.60% | 74.98% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 84.03% | 72.86% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 85.75% | 76.12% | |
| Max daily dropi | 26.37% | 27.72% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 36.32% | 34.49% |
| Category | ROOT | LMND |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Root, Inc. | Lemonade, Inc. |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Core business | Telematics-based auto insurance company that uses smartphone driving behavior data to price risk more accurately. Root targets good drivers with competitive pricing by excluding risky drivers entirely, improving the loss ratio mathematically rather than through underwriting intuition. | AI-powered digital insurance company offering renters, homeowners, pet, auto, and life insurance through a mobile-first platform. Lemonade uses an AI bot (Maya) for instant quotes and claims, donating unused premiums to charity through its giveback model. |
| Investor focus | Loss ratio improvement from telematics-driven underwriting, growth in policies in force, customer acquisition cost efficiency, and path to underwriting profitability. | In-force premium growth, loss ratio improvement (particularly in homeowners), customer acquisition efficiency, cross-selling across product lines, and path to profitability. |
- Telematics driving data creates structurally better underwriting accuracy than traditional actuarial tables — good drivers get better prices
- Digital-first model has lower distribution costs than agent-based auto insurers
- Loss ratio improvement has been the primary focus and has shown meaningful progress
- Brand-differentiated 'giveback' model creates emotional loyalty among younger customers
- Multi-line insurance platform allows cross-selling from renters to homeowners and auto as customers' lives evolve
- AI claims processing creates faster settlement for straightforward claims and lower administrative cost
- Auto insurance is a highly competitive, capital-intensive business with strong incumbents (Progressive, Geico)
- CAC (customer acquisition cost) in auto insurance is high — telematics screening adds friction to the acquisition funnel
- Reinsurance costs and catastrophe exposure add earnings volatility
- Lemonade's loss ratios have been persistently high, particularly in homeowners insurance and auto
- Catastrophe exposure (hurricanes, wildfires) creates lumpiness in homeowners loss experience
- Lemonade has grown rapidly but remains far from underwriting profitability — cash burn has been significant
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on ROOT and LMND. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside ROOT and LMND, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.