KRE vs XLF Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
KRE and XLF both provide financial sector exposure but with very different compositions. KRE is a pure-play on 140+ US regional banks equally weighted — maximum regional bank cycle leverage. XLF is a diversified financial sector fund including mega-banks, insurance, payment networks, and asset managers. KRE offers concentrated regional bank exposure for targeted bets on bank sector; XLF offers broad financial sector diversification. KRE has higher volatility and more regional bank-specific risk; XLF has more stability from diversification.
KRE vs XLF — SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (140+ US regional banks equally weighted, providing maximum exposure to regional bank NIM environment, CRE credit quality, and deposit stability cycles) versus Financial Select Sector SPDR (broad S&P 500 financial sector with JPMorgan, Berkshire, Visa, Mastercard dominance providing diversified financial sector exposure).
KRE holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. KRE has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+15.22% vs +5.45% for XLF).
- want concentrated regional bank exposure for a specific bet on the US regional bank cycle — net interest margin expansion, steepening yield curve, or CRE credit normalization
- believe regional bank valuations are compelling (historically low price-to-book) and want undiluted exposure without mega-bank or payment network contamination
- are comfortable with higher volatility and 2023-style deposit flight risk in exchange for maximum regional bank cycle upside when conditions improve
- use KRE as a tactical allocation rather than core holding — positioning for specific financial sector macro themes
- want diversified financial sector exposure including mega-banks, insurance, payment networks, and asset managers through a single 0.09% ETF
- prefer mega-bank stability (JPMorgan, BofA, Wells Fargo) without the concentrated regional bank CRE exposure and deposit flight risk KRE carries
- use XLF as a financial sector allocation within a sector ETF portfolio alongside technology (XLK), healthcare (XLV), and other sectors
- value Visa/Mastercard secular payment growth within their financial sector allocation — XLF's payment network exposure provides non-bank financial growth
| Metric | KRE | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 24.8 | 26.8 |
| Latest closei | $69.75 | $55.27 |
| 1M returni | -5.27% | -2.44% |
| 3M returni | -9.98% | -2.26% |
| 6M returni | +2.51% | +6.98% |
| 1Y returni | +15.22% | +5.45% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | KRE | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $11.8K (+18.0%) started 2025-10-15 | $10.71K (+7.1%) started 2025-10-15 |
| 5Y ago | $13.15K (+31.5%) started 2021-10-15 | $16.66K (+66.6%) started 2021-10-15 |
| 10Y ago | $28.56K (+185.6%) started 2016-10-17 | $42.05K (+320.5%) started 2016-10-17 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | KRE | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $3.73B | $50.97B |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.32% | 1.55% |
| Trailing P/Ei | 12.08 | 15.75 |
| Betai | 0.91 | 0.88 |
| 52-week change | 15.22% | 5.45% |
| Metric | KRE | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | +15.22% | +5.45% |
| 6M returni | +2.51% | +6.98% |
| 3M returni | -9.98% | -2.26% |
| 1M returni | -5.27% | -2.44% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 0.56 | 0.13 |
| Betai | 0.91 | 0.88 |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.32% | 1.55% |
| 5Y CAGR | +2.59% | +8.80% |
Over the past year, KRE and XLF have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.70), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | KRE | XLF |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +15.22% | +5.45% |
| CAGRi | +15.23% | +5.45% | |
| Volatilityi | 21.35% | 14.67% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.56 | 0.13 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.79 | 0.18 | |
| Max drawdowni | 14.95% | 14.79% | |
| Current drawdowni | 9.99% | 5.28% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 4.26% | 4.65% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 5.69% | 6.04% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.20% | 3.35% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 7.13% | 4.81% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +13.62% | +52.43% |
| CAGRi | +2.59% | +8.80% | |
| Volatilityi | 29.39% | 18.28% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.08 | 0.31 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.12 | 0.44 | |
| Max drawdowni | 52.69% | 25.81% | |
| Current drawdowni | 9.99% | 5.28% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 20.37% | 7.90% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 24.43% | 10.65% | |
| Max daily dropi | 12.31% | 7.32% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 25.83% | 12.19% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +114.81% | +243.64% |
| CAGRi | +7.95% | +13.15% | |
| Volatilityi | 31.74% | 22.08% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.26 | 0.47 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.37 | 0.66 | |
| Max drawdowni | 55.03% | 42.86% | |
| Current drawdowni | 9.99% | 5.28% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 16.82% | 7.63% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 21.58% | 10.76% | |
| Max daily dropi | 15.49% | 13.71% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 26.25% | 22.99% |
| Category | KRE | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $3.73B | $50.97B |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.32% | 1.55% |
- Equal weighting gives true regional bank exposure: KRE's equal weight prevents JPMorgan-sized companies from dominating — provides genuine small/mid regional bank factor exposure
- Net interest margin leverage: regional banks earn more when the yield curve steepens — KRE benefits significantly from favorable rate environments
- Economically sensitive value play: regional banks are correlated with economic expansion — loan growth, business formation, and housing activity all drive regional bank revenue
- Financial sector diversification beyond regional banks: XLF includes Visa, Mastercard, Berkshire, insurance companies (Progressive, Chubb, MetLife) and asset managers (BlackRock) — broader than pure bank exposure
- Mega-bank quality and stability: JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo in XLF have more diversified revenue than regional banks and survived 2023 regional bank stress without crisis
- Payment network exposure (Visa/Mastercard): XLF includes payment network duopoly in the financial sector allocation — secular growth businesses with different drivers than traditional banking
- Commercial real estate (CRE) exposure: regional banks hold large CRE loan portfolios — office building value declines post-COVID create potential loan losses that are still working through the system
- Deposit flight risk during banking stress: 2023's Silicon Valley Bank collapse and regional bank deposit flight showed regional banks' vulnerability to confidence crises — KRE fell 30%+ in early 2023
- Regulatory capital requirements increasing: post-SVB, regulators are requiring banks to hold more capital — constraining lending capacity and returns on equity
- JPMorgan dominance: JPMorgan and other mega-banks represent 40%+ of XLF — investors seeking regional bank or insurance exposure specifically get a diluted version through XLF
- Lower sensitivity to regional bank opportunities: when regional banks are particularly cheap vs mega-banks or have catalysts (steepening yield curve), XLF's diversification dilutes the regional bank thesis vs KRE
- Large cap-weight concentration in top 5 holdings: XLF's top 5 holdings represent 40%+ of the ETF — less diversified than the 140+ equal-weighted regional bank portfolio of KRE
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on KRE and XLF. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside KRE and XLF, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.