ARM vs RISC-V Architecture Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
ARM (Arm Holdings) and RISC-V represent the two dominant CPU architecture paradigms — ARM's proprietary licensed architecture that dominates smartphones and embedded systems globally with a growing data center presence, versus RISC-V's open-source, royalty-free architecture gaining adoption in embedded systems, Chinese AI chips, and government-sponsored initiatives seeking to avoid ARM royalty dependencies. ARM is publicly traded; RISC-V is an open standard with no direct investable entity.
ARM vs RISC-V is the tension between the world's dominant proprietary CPU architecture (Arm Holdings' royalty-generating IP licensing business with billions of ARM-based chips shipping annually across mobile, embedded, and data center) versus the growing open-source RISC-V ecosystem that allows chip designers to eliminate royalty payments at the cost of a less mature software stack — proprietary IP with embedded ecosystem leverage versus open-standard architecture with royalty-free economics.
ARM and SIFP are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want exposure to global semiconductor growth through Arm's royalty model — billions of ARM-based chips ship annually; as IoT, automotive, and AI applications grow chip shipments, ARM's royalty pool grows without proportional cost increases
- Value Arm's architectural dominance in mobile (virtually 100% of smartphone CPUs) as a durable moat given the decades-long software ecosystem lock-in that makes switching to RISC-V costly for high-end applications
- See Armv9 architecture adoption driving royalty rate expansion over the next 3-5 years as device makers upgrade from Armv8, increasing ARM's revenue per chip without requiring volume growth
- RISC-V's royalty-free economics create competitive pressure on ARM's pricing power — if large chip producers adopt RISC-V for more applications, ARM's ability to increase royalty rates may be constrained
- Chinese tech investment in RISC-V (Alibaba's T-Head, government-backed startups) reduces Chinese demand for ARM licenses — a meaningful risk given China is a major ARM royalty revenue source
- RISC-V's embedded and IoT adoption demonstrates real-world production viability, though displacing ARM in high-performance application processors remains a multi-decade challenge
| Metric | ARM | SIFP |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 50.3 | N/A |
| AI ranki | #382 | N/A |
| Latest closei | $244.79 | N/A |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | ARM | SIFP |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $14.34K (+43.4%) started 2025-10-15 | N/A |
| 5Y ago | $38.5K (+285.0%) started 2023-09-14 | N/A |
| 10Y ago | $38.5K (+285.0%) started 2023-09-14 | N/A |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | ARM | SIFP |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $261.44B | N/A |
| Trailing P/Ei | 252.36 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 79.92 | N/A |
| Price/Salesi | 50.71 | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 50.05 | N/A |
| Analyst targeti | $290.71 | N/A |
| Target upsidei | +18.76% | N/A |
| Metric | ARM | SIFP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 22.40% | N/A |
| Earnings growthi | 108.30% | N/A |
| EPS growthi | +108.30% | N/A |
| FCF margini | +25.88% | N/A |
| Operating margini | 7.60% | N/A |
| Profit margini | 20.25% | N/A |
| ROIC proxyi | 13.35% | N/A |
| Return on equityi | 13.35% | N/A |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.00% | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 3.79 | N/A |
| Debt/equityi | 5.62 | N/A |
| Current ratioi | 5.25 | N/A |
| Quick ratioi | 5.06 | N/A |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | ARM | SIFP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +43.43% | N/A |
| CAGRi | +43.46% | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | 78.95% | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.79 | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.30 | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | 48.83% | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | 44.30% | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | 25.53% | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 29.13% | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | 12.84% | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | 25.35% | N/A | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +284.95% | N/A |
| CAGRi | +54.78% | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | 77.08% | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.88 | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.46 | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | 53.97% | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | 44.30% | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | 22.80% | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 25.96% | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | 19.46% | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | 30.98% | N/A | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +284.95% | N/A |
| CAGRi | +54.78% | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | 77.08% | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.88 | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.46 | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | 53.97% | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | 44.30% | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | 22.80% | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 25.96% | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | 19.46% | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | 30.98% | N/A |
| Category | ARM | SIFP |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Arm Holdings plc | RISC-V Ecosystem (No Single Publicly Traded Entity) |
| Sector | Technology - Semiconductor Intellectual Property | Technology - Open-Source Semiconductor Architecture |
| Industry | Semiconductors | N/A |
| Core business | Arm Holdings designs CPU architectures and licenses those designs to semiconductor companies worldwide. Rather than manufacturing chips, Arm sells IP licenses: chip makers (Apple, Qualcomm, Samsung, MediaTek, Nvidia, and hundreds of others) license Arm's architecture to design custom processors. Arm's CPU architecture (ISA — Instruction Set Architecture) powers virtually all smartphones globally (Apple A-series, Qualcomm Snapdragon), embedded microcontrollers, automotive systems, and increasingly data center servers (Amazon Graviton, Microsoft Cobalt, Ampere Computing). Arm IPO'd on Nasdaq in September 2023; SoftBank retains approximately 90% ownership. | RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture (ISA) — a specification for how a CPU's instructions are structured and executed — developed at UC Berkeley in 2010 and now governed by RISC-V International (a Switzerland-based non-profit). Unlike Arm (proprietary, licensed), RISC-V is royalty-free: any company can design a RISC-V processor without paying IP licensing fees. RISC-V is gaining adoption in: microcontrollers and embedded systems (ESP32-C3/C6 chips, WCH processors), storage controllers (Western Digital uses RISC-V in drive controllers), AI accelerators (many custom AI chips include RISC-V cores for control functions), and emerging data center CPUs (Chinese tech giants building RISC-V server CPUs). Note: RISC-V International is a non-profit; SiFive (the leading RISC-V IP vendor) is private. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Arm's royalty revenue (per-chip royalty from billions of ARM-based chips shipped annually), licensing revenue (up-front fees for new architecture licenses and technology subscriptions), royalty rate trends (newer Armv9 architecture commands higher royalties than older Armv8), and Arm's penetration into AI data center CPUs. | Since RISC-V International is a non-profit and SiFive is private, investors cannot directly invest in RISC-V as a company. RISC-V adoption can be tracked as a competitive threat to ARM's licensing model. Public exposure exists through RISC-V-adopting companies (Western Digital — WDC, Alibaba — BABA) and Andes Technology (TWSE: 6533 — a Taiwan-listed RISC-V IP company). Semiconductor ETFs (SOXX, SMH) provide broad exposure including ARM. |
- Dominant CPU IP position across mobile, embedded, and increasingly data center — virtually every smartphone globally uses Arm CPUs; this installed base creates ecosystem lock-in (developers write for Arm, software is optimized for Arm, tools target Arm) creating a self-reinforcing platform
- Royalty model creates leveraged exposure to semiconductor cycle growth — for every Arm-based chip shipped globally, Arm earns a royalty; as global chip shipments grow across automotive, IoT, and AI applications, Arm's royalty pool grows without proportional cost increases
- Armv9 architecture transition drives royalty rate expansion — Armv9 (introduced 2021) commands royalty rates approximately 2x higher than Armv8; as the ecosystem transitions from older Armv8 to Armv9 chips over the next 3-5 years, Arm's revenue per chip increases without volume growth
- Zero royalty cost eliminates the per-chip cost that Arm architecture licenses impose — large chip producers can save hundreds of millions in royalties by adopting RISC-V; for commodity microcontrollers shipped in billions of units, even small royalty savings compound significantly
- Open ecosystem with no single-vendor dependency risk — RISC-V chip designers are not dependent on Arm Holdings' commercial decisions or pricing; this is particularly appealing for Chinese tech companies seeking to avoid dependence on U.S.-headquartered IP vendors
- Modularity and extensibility for custom AI and domain-specific architectures — RISC-V's open standard allows chip designers to add custom instructions without licensing restrictions; this makes RISC-V particularly attractive for AI accelerator and domain-specific chip design
- RISC-V open-source architecture is a growing alternative that avoids Arm royalties — large companies (Google, Alibaba, Western Digital, Intel) have invested in RISC-V chip development; governments (China, EU) are promoting RISC-V to reduce dependence on proprietary Western CPU IP; RISC-V eliminates the royalty cost that Arm charges
- China revenue concentration and geopolitical risk — Arm licenses technology to Chinese chip makers; U.S. export controls and restrictions on technology transfer to China create uncertainty about Arm's largest geographic market
- SoftBank's large ownership stake creates liquidity and governance risk — SoftBank retains ~90% of ARM; as SoftBank manages its own financial obligations, secondary sales of ARM stock could suppress the share price
- Ecosystem maturity gap versus Arm's 30+ year established software ecosystem — Arm's most powerful advantage is decades of software, tools, operating systems, and developer familiarity; RISC-V toolchains and developer tooling are advancing but remain less mature
- No performance-leading RISC-V processor competes with Arm in high-performance applications — for smartphones or laptops, there is currently no RISC-V processor matching the performance of Apple Silicon or Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite; RISC-V penetration is primarily in embedded/IoT
- RISC-V commercial investment requires working with fragmented vendor ecosystem — unlike Arm (one vendor, comprehensive support), RISC-V commercial customers must navigate multiple vendors for IP, tools, and support
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on ARM and SIFP. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside ARM and SIFP, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.