BYD vs LI: BYD vs Li Auto Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
BYD is the world's largest full-spectrum EV/PHEV manufacturer while Li Auto is a premium EREV specialist targeting Chinese family SUV buyers with range-extended technology. BYD offers global scale and diversification; Li Auto offers a focused premium EREV market niche with better margins than many EV peers.
BYD vs LI is global EV volume and vertical integration versus premium extended-range EV specialization — BYD wins if scale and full-spectrum EV competition dominate; Li Auto wins if EREV technology remains preferred for family buyers in China until BEV infrastructure matures.
BYDDY holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. BYDDY has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-32.23% vs -49.56%), though LI has the better forward P/E setup (3.08x vs 11.32x for BYDDY). BYDDY leads on both revenue growth (-3.20%) and operating margin (7.24%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for BYDDY (+72.04%) than for LI (+32.63%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- want the world's largest EV manufacturer with global scale and profitability
- value BYD's full spectrum from affordable to premium EVs and PHEVs
- prefer vertical integration as a structural cost advantage in a commoditizing EV market
- want international expansion optionality alongside dominant China market position
- prefer a profitable, focused premium EREV specialist vs BYD's diverse lineup
- believe extended-range technology addresses China's charging infrastructure gaps better than pure BEV
- want exposure to premium family EV buyers who value range above all
- are comfortable with Li Auto's eventual BEV transition risk as China's infrastructure matures
| Metric | BYDDY | LI |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 51.1 | 25.0 |
| AI ranki | N/A | #2848 |
| Latest closei | $9.30 | $11.46 |
| 1M returni | -7.74% | -2.55% |
| 3M returni | -18.64% | -10.89% |
| 6M returni | -34.88% | -38.12% |
| 1Y returni | -32.23% | -49.56% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | BYDDY | LI |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $6.81K (-31.9%) started 2025-10-15 | $5.04K (-49.6%) started 2025-10-15 |
| 5Y ago | $8.49K (-15.1%) started 2021-10-15 | $3.74K (-62.6%) started 2021-10-15 |
| 10Y ago | $49.03K (+390.3%) started 2016-10-17 | $6.96K (-30.4%) started 2020-07-30 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | BYDDY | LI |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $84.79B | $11.2B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 20.22 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 11.32 | 3.08 |
| Price/Salesi | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| EV/Revenuei | 0.12 | -0.56 |
| Analyst targeti | $16.00 | $15.20 |
| Target upsidei | +72.04% | +32.63% |
| Metric | BYDDY | LI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | -3.20% | -15.10% |
| Earnings growthi | 33.70% | N/A |
| EPS growthi | +33.70% | N/A |
| FCF margini | -12.39% | -9.30% |
| Operating margini | 7.24% | -8.50% |
| Profit margini | 3.79% | -4.40% |
| ROIC proxyi | 11.60% | -6.57% |
| Return on equityi | 11.60% | -6.57% |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.56% | 0.00% |
| Payout ratioi | 11.26% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | 3 yrs | N/A |
| Betai | 0.35 | 0.49 |
| Debt/equityi | 46.06 | 22.27 |
| Current ratioi | 0.87 | 1.81 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.39 | 1.57 |
Over the past year, BYDDY and LI have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.51), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | BYDDY | LI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -32.23% | -49.56% |
| CAGRi | -32.25% | -49.58% | |
| Volatilityi | 35.80% | 37.89% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -1.04 | -1.74 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -1.49 | -2.33 | |
| Max drawdowni | 35.44% | 52.95% | |
| Current drawdowni | 34.88% | 49.56% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 14.99% | 29.81% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 17.70% | 32.71% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.55% | 9.83% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 13.37% | 19.18% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -18.12% | -62.60% |
| CAGRi | -3.92% | -17.86% | |
| Volatilityi | 44.35% | 62.02% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.03 | -0.08 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.04 | -0.12 | |
| Max drawdowni | 52.54% | 77.08% | |
| Current drawdowni | 52.13% | 75.43% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 27.34% | 41.24% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 29.92% | 45.45% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.00% | 20.61% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.07% | 31.52% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +361.65% | -30.38% |
| CAGRi | +16.54% | -5.66% | |
| Volatilityi | 47.34% | 66.96% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.46 | 0.18 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.72 | 0.27 | |
| Max drawdowni | 58.11% | 77.08% | |
| Current drawdowni | 52.13% | 75.43% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 26.93% | 41.80% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 30.66% | 45.11% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.00% | 20.61% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.29% | 31.52% |
| Category | BYDDY | LI |
|---|---|---|
| Company | BYD Company Limited | Li Auto Inc. |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Auto Manufacturers | Auto Manufacturers |
| Core business | World's largest EV and PHEV manufacturer with vertical battery, semiconductor, and assembly integration. BYD serves price segments from $10,000 to $150,000 through multiple brands. | Chinese EV company specializing in extended-range electric vehicles (EREVs) — cars with a small gasoline generator that recharges the battery, extending range to 1,000+ km without pure EV infrastructure dependency. Li Auto targets the premium family SUV segment. |
| Investor focus | Global delivery leadership, DM PHEV technology adoption, international expansion, and operating margin durability. | Monthly deliveries and model lineup expansion, EREV vs BEV transition strategy, gross margin durability, and Li Auto's ability to expand beyond family SUVs. |
- Largest EV/PHEV volumes globally give BYD unparalleled manufacturing scale and component cost leverage
- DM 5.0 PHEV platform allows 2,000+ km range, removing range anxiety for Chinese buyers without charging infrastructure
- Vertical integration in batteries and key components makes BYD structurally cost-competitive
- EREV technology removes range anxiety completely in markets where charging infrastructure is insufficient — a key differentiator for long-distance Chinese families
- Li Auto achieved profitability faster than most Chinese EV startups through disciplined platform engineering and pricing strategy
- Premium family SUV focus means Li Auto serves a less commoditized segment than BYD's mass-market
- Price competition in China compresses margins despite scale advantages
- EU and US tariffs restrict BYD's international revenue potential in key markets
- Rapid product cycle expectations from Chinese consumers require constant model refreshes
- Pure BEV transition is necessary long-term as charging infrastructure improves and regulators push toward zero-emission vehicles
- BYD is moving upmarket with Denza and other brands that will increasingly compete with Li Auto's price range
- Li Auto's family SUV positioning may limit its total addressable market vs BYD's full-spectrum approach
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on BYDDY and LI. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside BYDDY and LI, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.