LIVE
STLA
Stellantis N.V. · Consumer Discretionary - Automobiles
$6.34
-13.74% this month
VERSUS
⟷
COMPARE
F
Ford Motor Company · Consumer Discretionary - Automobiles
$14.06
+7.66% this month
Scoreboard verdict
Across AI score, momentum, valuation, upside, operating margin
STLA
2
F
2
Comparison scoreboard
MIXED SETUPAI Score
STLA 36.8
F ✓40.0
1Y Return
STLA -33.61%
F ✓+34.93%
Fwd P/E
STLA ✓3.60
F 7.66
Target Up.
STLA ✓+45.02%
F +5.63%
Op. Margin
STLA N/A
F 5.74%
Metrics last refreshed: 6/22/2026
Quick take
STLA vs F Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
STLA (Stellantis) and F (Ford) are both major legacy automakers navigating the EV transition with very different strategies — Stellantis under CEO Tavares achieved exceptional EBIT margins through cost discipline across 14 brands while managing EV launch execution across global markets, while Ford is pursuing a three-segment structure separating its highly profitable Ford Pro commercial business, its legacy Blue ICE business, and its loss-making Model e EV investments.
STLA vs F is 14-brand global automaker with best-in-class margin discipline and Jeep/Ram/Dodge North American pricing power (Stellantis's cost-focus strategy, exceptional EBIT margins, and electrification of global portfolio — navigating leadership transition after Tavares departure and U.S. market share recovery) versus U.S. automotive icon with dominant F-Series franchise and Ford Pro commercial vehicle growth (Ford's profitable commercial truck business, F-150 Lightning EV flagship, and segmented structure isolating EV losses — managing massive Model e investment losses while protecting ICE profitability from core Ford Blue and Pro segments).
Live analysis · updated 6/22/2026
STLA and F are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly. F has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+34.93% vs -33.61%), though STLA trades at the lower forward P/E (3.60x vs 7.66x). Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for STLA (+45.02%) than for F (+5.63%).
Normalized 1Y performance
STLA
F
Recent returns
STLA
F
Analyst price targets & sentiment
STLA · 10 analysts
STRONG BUYHOLDSTRONG SELL
Buy (2.5/5.0)
Price target range
analyst low$6.20
analyst high$14.40
analyst mean$9.19
current price$6.34
+45.0% upside to analyst mean
F
Price target range
analyst mean$14.85
current price$14.06
+5.6% upside to analyst mean
Who should consider this stock?
STLA may suit investors who:
- →Want global automotive exposure with exceptional EBIT margins from a cost-disciplined CEO who transformed PSA and then FCA/Stellantis
- →Value Stellantis's 14-brand diversity spanning economy (Fiat) to premium (Maserati) across North America, Europe, and emerging markets as providing resilience through product and geographic cycles
- →Believe Jeep's global adventure brand and Ram's truck franchise provide durable pricing power and loyal customer bases in the most profitable vehicle segments
F may suit investors who:
- →Want the stock of an iconic American automotive brand with the longest-selling vehicle franchise in U.S. history (F-Series, 45+ years as #1 seller)
- →Value Ford Pro's rapidly growing commercial vehicle and fleet services business as the highest-quality earnings segment with significant subscription services upside
- →Believe Ford's EV losses will eventually moderate as scale improves and that the three-segment structure (Blue/Pro/Model e) creates clear visibility into which parts of the business are profitable
Performance & AI score
| Metric | STLA | F |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 36.8 | 40.0 |
| AI rank | #1474 | #1098 |
| Latest close | $6.34 | $14.06 |
| 1M return | -13.74% | +7.66% |
| 6M return | -45.67% | +5.63% |
| 1Y return | -33.61% | +34.93% |
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | STLA | F |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $6.64K (-33.6%) started 2025-06-18 | $13.48K (+34.8%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $6.32K (-36.8%) started 2021-06-18 | $16.17K (+61.7%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $37.77K (+277.7%) started 2016-06-20 | $31.03K (+210.3%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
Valuation & upside potential
| Metric | STLA | F |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $18.37B | $56.02B |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | 11.79 |
| Forward P/E | 3.60 | 7.66 |
| Price/Sales | 0.12 | N/A |
| EV/Revenue | 0.23 | 1.02 |
| Analyst target | $9.19 | $14.85 |
| Target upside | +45.02% | +5.63% |
Growth, profitability & risk
| Metric | STLA | F |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 6.50% | 6.40% |
| Earnings growth | N/A | 430.80% |
| EPS growth | N/A | +430.80% |
| FCF margin | -3.74% | -1.18% |
| Operating margin | N/A | 5.74% |
| Profit margin | -13.87% | -3.22% |
| ROIC proxy | -30.15% | -14.81% |
| Return on equity | -30.15% | -14.81% |
| Dividend yield | 10.58% | 4.27% |
| Beta | 0.97 | 1.80 |
| Debt/equity | 78.66 | 425.54 |
| Current ratio | 1.03 | 1.09 |
| Quick ratio | 0.68 | 0.88 |
Drawdown & downside risk
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
1Y risk snapshot
STLA max drawdown47.77%
F max drawdown22.31%
STLA max wkly drop26.24%
F max wkly drop14.56%
5Y risk snapshot
STLA max drawdown74.97%
F max drawdown56.51%
STLA max wkly drop26.24%
F max wkly drop23.30%
10Y risk snapshot
STLA max drawdown74.97%
F max drawdown64.77%
STLA max wkly drop36.69%
F max wkly drop23.73%
Performance metrics by period
| Period | Metric | STLA | F |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | -33.61% | +34.80% |
| CAGR | -33.63% | +34.86% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.61 | 0.86 | |
| Max drawdown | 47.77% | 22.31% | |
| Max daily drop | 23.69% | 7.46% | |
| Max wkly drop | 26.24% | 14.56% | |
| 5Y | Growth | -55.27% | +22.30% |
| CAGR | -14.86% | +4.11% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.28 | 0.19 | |
| Max drawdown | 74.97% | 56.51% | |
| Max daily drop | 23.69% | 18.36% | |
| Max wkly drop | 26.24% | 23.30% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +68.89% | +69.24% |
| CAGR | +5.38% | +5.41% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.23 | 0.21 | |
| Max drawdown | 74.97% | 64.77% | |
| Max daily drop | 23.69% | 18.36% | |
| Max wkly drop | 36.69% | 23.73% |
Business comparison
| Category | STLA | F |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Stellantis N.V. | Ford Motor Company |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary - Automobiles | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | Stellantis N.V. is a multinational automotive manufacturer formed through the 2021 merger of FCA (Fiat Chrysler Automobiles — Jeep, Ram, Dodge, Chrysler, Fiat, Alfa Romeo, Maserati) and PSA Group (Peugeot, Citroën, DS, Opel/Vauxhall). Stellantis operates 14 automotive brands globally and is the world's fourth-largest automaker by sales volume. Stellantis is headquartered in Amsterdam and has strong market positions in North America (Jeep, Ram), Europe (Peugeot, Citroën, Opel), and Brazil (Fiat). Stellantis's strategy is built around software-defined vehicles, EV investments across all segments, and aggressive cost targets; CEO Carlos Tavares (who successfully restructured PSA before the merger) is focused on margin expansion through cost discipline and electrification. | Ford Motor Company is one of the most recognized American automotive brands, producing vehicles under the Ford and Lincoln brands. Ford restructured its business into three operating segments: Ford Blue (legacy combustion engine retail vehicles, including Bronco, Explorer, Edge, Escape, and trucks), Ford Pro (commercial vehicles — F-Series Super Duty, Transit van, E-Transit electric van; professional services and fleet business), and Ford Model e (electric vehicles — F-150 Lightning, Mustang Mach-E, E-Transit, and future EVs including a next-gen truck platform). Ford also holds approximately 12% of Rivian Automotive (reduced from its original stake). |
| Investor focus | Investors track Stellantis's EBIT margin (targeting 10%+ through the cycle), EV launch execution across brands, U.S. market share recovery, and capital return (dividends and buybacks). | Investors track Ford Pro's profitability (the highest-margin segment), Ford Model e's losses and path to EV profitability, total company EBIT margin, quality and warranty cost improvement, and the overall EV investment commitment vs. ICE profitability balance. |
STLA strengths
- →14-brand portfolio covering every market segment from economy (Fiat) to premium (Maserati) across North America, Europe, and emerging markets provides resilience through product cycle and geographic diversification
- →Exceptional profitability under Tavares's leadership — Stellantis has generated among the highest EBIT margins in the automotive industry (10-15%) through aggressive cost management, pricing discipline, and product mix; this profitability funds EV investment without sacrificing near-term returns
- →Jeep, Ram, and Dodge brands in North America command premium pricing and loyal customer bases — Jeep's global off-road adventure brand, Ram's truck lineup, and Dodge's performance heritage provide strong pricing power in the U.S. market
F strengths
- →Ford Pro commercial vehicle business is highly profitable and growing — Ford Pro (F-Series Super Duty commercial trucks, Transit vans, and fleet services) is Ford's fastest-growing and most profitable segment; commercial truck and van customers are less price-sensitive and more loyal than consumer retail buyers; Ford Pro's subscription services (fleet management, diagnostics, financing) create recurring revenue
- →F-Series pickup remains the best-selling vehicle in the U.S. for 45+ consecutive years — the F-Series franchise (F-150 consumer, Super Duty commercial) is Ford's most profitable product line; the F-150's brand loyalty, towing capability, and configuration flexibility make it extraordinarily difficult to displace
- →EV investments are strategically targeted at high-volume, high-value segments — the F-150 Lightning (world's best-selling EV-equivalent of a dominant ICE franchise), Mustang Mach-E (leveraging an iconic nameplate), and E-Transit position Ford in high-profile, high-demand EV categories
Risks to watch — STLA
- →U.S. market share has declined as Stellantis prioritized margins over volume — under Tavares, Stellantis cut production of low-margin vehicles and raised prices; U.S. dealer inventory fell significantly; while profitable short-term, market share losses could be hard to recapture
- →EV transition execution uncertainty — Stellantis must electrify 14 brands across all segments; the scale of the EV investment requirement is enormous; Stellantis has been criticized by some U.S. dealers for slow EV rollout and limited U.S. EV product availability
- →Carlos Tavares's unexpected departure in December 2024 created leadership uncertainty — Tavares's exit removed the architect of Stellantis's cost-first strategy; finding and orienting a new CEO will take time; strategic continuity is uncertain
Risks to watch — F
- →Ford Model e EV segment is losing billions per unit — Ford's EV business (Model e) reported losses of approximately $3 billion in 2023 ($4.5 billion per year annualized); each EV sold loses thousands of dollars; scaling to profitability requires volume growth that competes against Tesla, Rivian, and GM's EV launches
- →Quality and warranty costs are a persistent profitability headwind — Ford has suffered high warranty and recall costs in recent years; quality issues affect customer satisfaction and consume engineering resources that could otherwise be deployed on next-generation products
- →EV transition requires massive capital investment that competes for cash with shareholder returns — Ford is spending $50 billion on EV investment through 2026; this capital is not available for dividends, buybacks, or ICE product investment; the EV transition is a capital-intensive bet that may not pay off at the speed originally projected
Frequently asked questions
Free public comparison
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons →