CHPT vs BLNK: ChargePoint vs Blink Charging Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
ChargePoint is the larger, software-platform-focused EV charging leader with a partner-funded network model while Blink is a smaller mixed-model charger operator. ChargePoint's size and software subscription approach position it better for long-term scale; Blink's smaller scale creates higher risk but potentially higher return if unit economics improve.
CHPT vs BLNK is the EV charging software platform leader versus a smaller mixed-model charging operator — ChargePoint's scale and subscription model offer a cleaner long-term thesis; Blink is a higher-risk, smaller-scale bet on EV charging network growth.
BLNK holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. CHPT has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-39.40% vs -79.49%), though BLNK has the better forward P/E setup (-1.92x vs -6.30x for CHPT). CHPT leads on both revenue growth (17.70%) and operating margin (-29.08%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for BLNK (+266.73%) than for CHPT (+3.73%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- prefer the scale of the largest US charging network with software subscription upside
- want asset-light growth from partner-funded hardware and ChargePoint software services
- value fleet charging as a differentiated high-value segment vs retail consumer charging
- are comfortable with ChargePoint's significant cash burn as it scales toward profitability
- want exposure to a smaller EV charging company with international diversification
- believe Blink's mixed Level 2 and DCFC portfolio serves diverse market needs
- prefer lower-priced entry into the EV charging sector despite higher risk
- are comfortable with execution risk in exchange for the upside of a smaller company improving unit economics
| Metric | CHPT | BLNK |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 22.8 | 23.7 |
| AI ranki | #3785 | #3413 |
| Latest closei | $7.23 | $0.44 |
| 1M returni | -18.03% | -14.81% |
| 3M returni | +24.87% | -19.75% |
| 6M returni | +16.80% | -33.58% |
| 1Y returni | -39.40% | -79.49% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | CHPT | BLNK |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $6.06K (-39.4%) started 2025-10-15 | $2.05K (-79.5%) started 2025-10-15 |
| 5Y ago | $183.41 (-98.2%) started 2021-10-15 | $156.37 (-98.4%) started 2021-10-15 |
| 10Y ago | $370.39 (-96.3%) started 2019-09-16 | $233.16 (-97.7%) started 2016-10-17 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | CHPT | BLNK |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $194.13M | $64.22M |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | -6.30 | -1.92 |
| Price/Salesi | 0.45 | 0.67 |
| EV/Revenuei | 0.81 | 0.36 |
| Analyst targeti | $7.50 | $1.63 |
| Target upsidei | +3.73% | +266.73% |
| Metric | CHPT | BLNK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 17.70% | -24.50% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | +7.57% | +19.48% |
| Operating margini | -29.08% | -34.59% |
| Profit margini | -40.59% | -52.48% |
| ROIC proxyi | -1015.08% | -85.48% |
| Return on equityi | -1015.08% | -85.48% |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Payout ratioi | N/A | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 1.70 | 2.08 |
| Debt/equityi | N/A | 9.35 |
| Current ratioi | 1.07 | 1.17 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.51 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, CHPT and BLNK have moved weakly in the same direction (correlation of 0.39), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | CHPT | BLNK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -39.40% | -79.49% |
| CAGRi | -39.42% | -79.51% | |
| Volatilityi | 106.25% | 84.57% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.07 | -1.52 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.14 | -2.25 | |
| Max drawdowni | 62.20% | 79.49% | |
| Current drawdowni | 39.40% | 79.49% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 40.41% | 63.17% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 42.66% | 65.16% | |
| Max daily dropi | 17.82% | 15.49% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 32.97% | 37.61% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -98.17% | -98.44% |
| CAGRi | -55.06% | -56.47% | |
| Volatilityi | 87.81% | 83.71% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.54 | -0.64 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.82 | -0.97 | |
| Max drawdowni | 99.19% | 99.05% | |
| Current drawdowni | 98.69% | 99.05% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 78.88% | 83.85% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 82.60% | 86.45% | |
| Max daily dropi | 35.46% | 16.92% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 40.66% | 37.61% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -96.30% | -97.67% |
| CAGRi | -37.22% | -31.35% | |
| Volatilityi | 82.27% | 121.47% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.23 | 0.18 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.35 | 0.33 | |
| Max drawdowni | 99.51% | 99.27% | |
| Current drawdowni | 99.22% | 99.27% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 66.61% | 78.56% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 75.80% | 81.88% | |
| Max daily dropi | 35.46% | 63.34% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 40.66% | 64.63% |
| Category | CHPT | BLNK |
|---|---|---|
| Company | ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. | Blink Charging Co. |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Engineering & Construction |
| Core business | Largest US EV charging network by port count using a partner-funded model where property owners purchase ChargePoint hardware and subscribe to cloud software. ChargePoint earns hardware, software subscription, and network services revenue. | EV charging operator with a mix of Level 2 and DC fast chargers at commercial, multifamily, and public locations. Blink uses a hybrid own-and-operate and network-partner model with US and international operations. |
| Investor focus | Subscription software revenue growth, networked port count, fleet charging expansion, and operating leverage toward profitability. | Owned station revenue per unit, network expansion, international revenues, and gross margin improvement. |
- Over 300,000 networked ports globally make ChargePoint the largest EV charging network by port count
- Software subscription model provides recurring revenue that scales without proportional capex growth
- Fleet operator focus is a differentiated high-value segment where ChargePoint's energy management software excels
- Diversified Level 2 and DC fast-charging portfolio serves multiple property types and customer needs
- International expansion in Europe provides revenue diversification beyond the US market
- Smaller size means higher percentage upside if unit economics improve materially
- Hardware revenue is low-margin and competitive with Chinese manufacturers offering cheaper units
- Revenue growth deceleration in 2024 raised questions about EV demand and partner investment pace
- Path to profitability requires significant subscription revenue scale that hasn't yet materialized
- Station reliability concerns have historically weighed on user satisfaction and operator trust
- Blink is significantly smaller than ChargePoint with less software subscription revenue leverage
- International operations add complexity without commensurate scale benefits at current size
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on CHPT and BLNK. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside CHPT and BLNK, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.