EVGO vs BLNK: EVgo vs Blink Charging Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
EVgo focuses on own-and-operate DC fast charging with GM and Nissan partnerships and higher per-session revenue potential, while Blink is a smaller, more diversified EV charging company with a mix of Level 2 and DC fast chargers and an international presence. EVgo is the more focused fast-charge play; Blink is the more diversified but smaller EV charging provider.
EVGO vs BLNK is a focused fast-charge operator with major automotive partnerships versus a smaller mixed-speed charger company with international diversification — EVgo offers cleaner DC fast-charge economics; Blink offers broader geographic and charger-type exposure at smaller scale.
BLNK holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. EVGO has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-75.66% vs -79.49%), though BLNK has the better forward P/E setup (-1.92x vs -2.86x for EVGO). On fundamentals, EVGO is growing revenue faster (-15.70%), while BLNK maintains the higher operating margin (-34.59%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for BLNK (+266.73%) than for EVGO (+192.66%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- prefer EVgo's focused DC fast-charging strategy with GM and Nissan partnerships
- believe own-and-operate produces better unit economics as utilization scales
- value EVgo's metropolitan market focus and NEVI-funded highway expansion
- want a cleaner US fast-charging bet vs a more diversified but smaller charging company
- want EV charging exposure across both Level 2 and DC fast chargers at a smaller scale
- value Blink's international presence beyond the US as a diversification benefit
- prefer a lower absolute investment threshold in an EV charging network company
- are comfortable with higher execution risk in exchange for more diverse revenue streams
| Metric | EVGO | BLNK |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 23.1 | 23.7 |
| AI ranki | #3691 | #3413 |
| Latest closei | $1.11 | $0.44 |
| 1M returni | -21.28% | -14.81% |
| 3M returni | -35.84% | -19.75% |
| 6M returni | -47.89% | -33.58% |
| 1Y returni | -75.66% | -79.49% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | EVGO | BLNK |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $2.43K (-75.7%) started 2025-10-15 | $2.05K (-79.5%) started 2025-10-15 |
| 5Y ago | $1.42K (-85.8%) started 2021-10-15 | $156.37 (-98.4%) started 2021-10-15 |
| 10Y ago | $1.13K (-88.7%) started 2020-11-20 | $233.16 (-97.7%) started 2016-10-17 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | EVGO | BLNK |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $396.29M | $64.22M |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | -2.86 | -1.92 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 0.67 |
| EV/Revenuei | 2.00 | 0.36 |
| Analyst targeti | $3.69 | $1.63 |
| Target upsidei | +192.66% | +266.73% |
| Metric | EVGO | BLNK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | -15.70% | -24.50% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | -42.59% | +19.48% |
| Operating margini | -45.88% | -34.59% |
| Profit margini | -13.50% | -52.48% |
| ROIC proxyi | -34.56% | -85.48% |
| Return on equityi | -34.56% | -85.48% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 0.00% |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 2.87 | 2.08 |
| Debt/equityi | 134.22 | 9.35 |
| Current ratioi | 2.19 | 1.17 |
| Quick ratioi | 1.34 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, EVGO and BLNK have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.41), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | EVGO | BLNK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -75.66% | -79.49% |
| CAGRi | -75.68% | -79.51% | |
| Volatilityi | 65.17% | 84.57% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -1.91 | -1.52 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -2.58 | -2.25 | |
| Max drawdowni | 76.10% | 79.49% | |
| Current drawdowni | 75.66% | 79.49% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 49.07% | 63.17% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 52.13% | 65.16% | |
| Max daily dropi | 14.66% | 15.49% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.20% | 37.61% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -85.77% | -98.44% |
| CAGRi | -32.29% | -56.47% | |
| Volatilityi | 86.15% | 83.71% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.10 | -0.64 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.16 | -0.97 | |
| Max drawdowni | 94.33% | 99.05% | |
| Current drawdowni | 94.23% | 99.05% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 73.82% | 83.85% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 75.91% | 86.45% | |
| Max daily dropi | 25.95% | 16.92% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 34.89% | 37.61% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -88.69% | -97.67% |
| CAGRi | -30.88% | -31.35% | |
| Volatilityi | 88.61% | 121.47% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.06 | 0.18 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.09 | 0.33 | |
| Max drawdowni | 95.06% | 99.27% | |
| Current drawdowni | 94.97% | 99.27% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 71.40% | 78.56% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 74.53% | 81.88% | |
| Max daily dropi | 25.95% | 63.34% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 34.89% | 64.63% |
| Category | EVGO | BLNK |
|---|---|---|
| Company | EVgo Inc. | Blink Charging Co. |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Industrials |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Engineering & Construction |
| Core business | Own-and-operate US public fast-charging network with DC fast chargers serving retail EV drivers across major metropolitan areas. EVgo has GM and Nissan partnerships and focuses on high-utilization public charging locations. | EV charging network providing both AC Level 2 and DC fast charging equipment through a mix of owner-operated and network-partner models. Blink installs chargers at commercial properties, multifamily housing, and public venues with a hybrid own/partner approach. |
| Investor focus | Revenue per charger, gross margin improvement with utilization scale, GM partnership impact on volumes, and network expansion across NEVI-funded corridors. | Revenue growth from owned chargers, SaaS-like subscription revenue from network services, international expansion, and path to unit economics improvement. |
- Own-and-operate model gives EVgo full revenue from each charging session and direct control over reliability
- DC fast charging focus targets the highest-revenue public charging segment
- NEVI highway corridor funding provides government-subsidized network expansion capital
- Diversified mix of Level 2 and DC fast chargers allows Blink to serve multiple charging needs and property types
- International business in Europe and other markets provides geographic diversification
- Network-partner revenue provides some capital-light component to complement owned stations
- Utilization rates remain low at many stations, weighing on gross margins
- Tesla Supercharger network opening to all EVs significantly increased public fast-charging competition
- Capital requirements to expand are substantial for an own-and-operate model
- Blink has been slower to improve unit economics and profitability than larger competitors
- Station reliability issues have historically been a concern, affecting user experience and operator reputation
- Smaller scale vs ChargePoint and EVgo means fewer brand recognition and volume advantages
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on EVGO and BLNK. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside EVGO and BLNK, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.