BYD vs NIO Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
BYD is the world's largest EV manufacturer with strong margins, vertical integration, and global expansion ambitions, while NIO is a premium Chinese EV brand differentiating through battery swap and a growing mass-market sub-brand. BYD is the safer, more profitable China EV business; NIO is the higher-risk growth story targeting premium differentiation.
BYD vs NIO is global EV volume leadership versus premium Chinese EV ecosystem — BYD wins if scale, integration, and global expansion drive sustained margin leadership; NIO wins if battery swap becomes a preferred ownership model and ONVO successfully enters mass market.
BYDDY holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. BYDDY has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-32.23% vs -48.68%), though NIO has the better forward P/E setup (4.11x vs 11.32x for BYDDY). On fundamentals, NIO is growing revenue faster (69.10%), while BYDDY maintains the higher operating margin (7.24%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for NIO (+79.26%) than for BYDDY (+72.04%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- want the world's largest EV/PHEV producer with proven scale manufacturing
- prefer a profitable, vertically integrated EV company vs higher-risk startups
- value BYD's Blade Battery and PHEV technology as durable competitive advantages
- want China EV exposure with global international expansion potential
- want premium China EV exposure with a unique battery swap ecosystem
- believe ONVO will successfully capture mass market and drive volume leverage
- are comfortable with negative margins and high cash burn in exchange for differentiation potential
- prefer NIO's brand community and customer experience focus over BYD's volume strategy
| Metric | BYDDY | NIO |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 51.1 | 26.1 |
| AI ranki | N/A | #2514 |
| Latest closei | $9.30 | $3.50 |
| 1M returni | -7.74% | -2.78% |
| 3M returni | -18.64% | -29.86% |
| 6M returni | -34.88% | -49.05% |
| 1Y returni | -32.23% | -48.68% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | BYDDY | NIO |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $6.81K (-31.9%) started 2025-10-15 | $5.13K (-48.7%) started 2025-10-15 |
| 5Y ago | $8.49K (-15.1%) started 2021-10-15 | $928.14 (-90.7%) started 2021-10-15 |
| 10Y ago | $49.03K (+390.3%) started 2016-10-17 | $5.3K (-47.0%) started 2018-09-12 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | BYDDY | NIO |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $84.79B | $8.77B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 20.22 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 11.32 | 4.11 |
| Price/Salesi | 0.11 | 0.08 |
| EV/Revenuei | 0.12 | 0.04 |
| Analyst targeti | $16.00 | $6.27 |
| Target upsidei | +72.04% | +79.26% |
| Metric | BYDDY | NIO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | -3.20% | 69.10% |
| Earnings growthi | 33.70% | N/A |
| EPS growthi | +33.70% | N/A |
| FCF margini | -12.39% | N/A |
| Operating margini | 7.24% | -1.08% |
| Profit margini | 3.79% | -4.17% |
| ROIC proxyi | 11.60% | -45.32% |
| Return on equityi | 11.60% | -45.32% |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.56% | 0.00% |
| Payout ratioi | 11.26% | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | 3 yrs | N/A |
| Betai | 0.35 | 0.92 |
| Debt/equityi | 46.06 | 203.22 |
| Current ratioi | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.39 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, BYDDY and NIO have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.41), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | BYDDY | NIO |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -32.23% | -48.68% |
| CAGRi | -32.25% | -48.70% | |
| Volatilityi | 35.80% | 50.01% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -1.04 | -1.18 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -1.49 | -1.69 | |
| Max drawdowni | 35.44% | 54.58% | |
| Current drawdowni | 34.88% | 52.83% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 14.99% | 29.85% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 17.70% | 32.65% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.55% | 7.81% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 13.37% | 14.75% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -18.12% | -90.72% |
| CAGRi | -3.92% | -37.84% | |
| Volatilityi | 44.35% | 70.91% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.03 | -0.39 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.04 | -0.58 | |
| Max drawdowni | 52.54% | 92.73% | |
| Current drawdowni | 52.13% | 91.90% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 27.34% | 76.96% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 29.92% | 79.30% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.00% | 17.07% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.07% | 29.90% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +361.65% | -46.97% |
| CAGRi | +16.54% | -7.54% | |
| Volatilityi | 47.34% | 85.09% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.46 | 0.25 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.72 | 0.42 | |
| Max drawdowni | 58.11% | 95.00% | |
| Current drawdowni | 52.13% | 94.43% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 26.93% | 68.97% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 30.66% | 74.08% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.00% | 21.16% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.29% | 42.65% |
| Category | BYDDY | NIO |
|---|---|---|
| Company | BYD Company Limited | NIO Inc. |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Auto Manufacturers | Auto Manufacturers |
| Core business | China's largest EV manufacturer by volume and the world's leading electric vehicle producer by deliveries. BYD makes EVs and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) across a wide price range under BYD, Denza, Fang Cheng Bao, and Yangwang brands. BYD also makes batteries, semiconductors, and solar panels with a vertically integrated supply chain. | Premium Chinese EV brand with battery swap network, battery-as-a-service subscription, and ONVO mass-market sub-brand. NIO targets differentiated premium buyers who value the swap ecosystem over standard charging. |
| Investor focus | Delivery volume and market share globally, PHEV and battery technology leadership, international expansion (Europe, Southeast Asia, Latin America), and operating margin at scale. | Delivery volumes, ONVO brand ramp, gross margin improvement, and cash burn trajectory toward breakeven. |
- World's highest volume EV and PHEV producer with industry-leading manufacturing scale and supply chain integration
- BYD's Blade Battery and DM 5.0 PHEV technology are widely considered best-in-class in China
- Vertical integration across batteries, semiconductors, and power electronics gives BYD cost advantages vs peers
- Battery swap network is a unique ecosystem advantage that BYD and other competitors have not replicated at scale
- Premium brand positioning allows higher ASPs than BYD's mass-market vehicles
- ONVO opens the mass-market segment without cannibalizing NIO brand premium
- Intense price competition in China has driven margins down as BYD and Tesla fight for market share
- International expansion faces tariffs (EU, US) and regulatory hurdles that may slow growth outside China
- Sheer volume makes BYD's growth rate naturally slower as the base effect kicks in
- NIO's vehicle gross margins remain very low, putting the company in a very different profitability position from BYD
- BYD's scale, brand strength, and technology are growing into NIO's premium segment
- Cash burn from battery swap infrastructure and NIO House expansion is heavy
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on BYDDY and NIO. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside BYDDY and NIO, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.