BYDDF vs TSLA Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
BYD and Tesla are the two largest global electric vehicle makers, but they pursue different strategies: BYD leans on deep vertical integration and a broad, affordable-to-premium vehicle lineup out of China, while Tesla leans on brand strength, software ambitions, and a narrower model lineup centered on the US and European markets.
BYD offers exposure to vertically integrated manufacturing scale and rapid volume growth across a wide price range, while Tesla offers exposure to brand strength and a long-term bet on autonomous driving software layered atop vehicle sales. Consider whether you prefer BYD's manufacturing breadth or Tesla's software-driven growth narrative.
BYDDF holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. TSLA has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-14.92% vs -27.03%), though BYDDF has the better forward P/E setup (1.79x vs 161.56x for TSLA). On fundamentals, TSLA is growing revenue faster (25.50%), while BYDDF maintains the higher operating margin (6.51%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for BYDDF (+118.77%) than for TSLA (+11.85%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want exposure to vertically integrated EV and battery manufacturing at global scale
- Believe a broad, affordable-to-premium vehicle lineup can outgrow narrower competitors
- Are comfortable with geopolitical and tariff risk tied to a China-based automaker's international expansion
- See Blade Battery technology as a durable cost and safety differentiator
- Want exposure to a globally recognized EV brand with pricing power in premium segments
- Believe autonomous driving software and robotaxi ambitions can become a meaningful long-term revenue driver
- Are comfortable paying a valuation premium tied to future software and AI potential
- Value diversification into energy storage and charging infrastructure alongside vehicle sales
| Metric | BYDDF | TSLA |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 53.6 | 71.8 |
| AI ranki | N/A | #55 |
| Latest closei | $9.18 | $398.50 |
| 1M returni | -2.75% | +7.53% |
| 3M returni | -23.31% | +21.74% |
| 6M returni | -29.38% | +2.34% |
| 1Y returni | -27.03% | -14.92% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | BYDDF | TSLA |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $7.3K (-27.0%) started 2025-11-03 | $8.97K (-10.3%) started 2025-11-04 |
| 5Y ago | $7.3K (-27.0%) started 2021-11-04 | $9.72K (-2.8%) started 2021-11-04 |
| 10Y ago | $47.93K (+379.3%) started 2016-11-04 | $313.68K (+3036.8%) started 2016-11-04 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | BYDDF | TSLA |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $83.7B | $1.38T |
| Trailing P/Ei | 18.00 | 322.92 |
| Forward P/Ei | 1.79 | 161.56 |
| Price/Salesi | 0.10 | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 0.16 | 13.03 |
| Analyst targeti | $20.08 | $390.09 |
| Target upsidei | +118.77% | +11.85% |
| Metric | BYDDF | TSLA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 13.60% | 25.50% |
| Earnings growthi | 28.70% | -3.00% |
| EPS growthi | +28.70% | -3.00% |
| FCF margini | -13.36% | +4.67% |
| Operating margini | 6.51% | 1.41% |
| Profit margini | 3.93% | 3.67% |
| ROIC proxyi | 11.94% | 4.67% |
| Return on equityi | 11.94% | 4.67% |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.58% | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 10.57% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | 3 yrs | N/A |
| Betai | 0.34 | 1.83 |
| Debt/equityi | 37.89 | 18.37 |
| Current ratioi | 0.84 | 1.94 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.28 | 1.35 |
Over the past year, BYDDF and TSLA have moved barely in the same direction (correlation of 0.14), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | BYDDF | TSLA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -27.03% | -10.30% |
| CAGRi | -27.04% | -10.32% | |
| Volatilityi | 35.30% | 44.64% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.85 | -0.12 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -1.24 | -0.17 | |
| Max drawdowni | 39.78% | 39.10% | |
| Current drawdowni | 36.16% | 18.65% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 14.87% | 18.40% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 18.92% | 20.32% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.66% | 14.52% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 13.78% | 20.24% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -29.23% | -2.80% |
| CAGRi | -6.68% | -0.57% | |
| Volatilityi | 44.19% | 59.62% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.04 | 0.21 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.06 | 0.31 | |
| Max drawdowni | 55.85% | 73.63% | |
| Current drawdowni | 53.20% | 18.65% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 28.11% | 34.57% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 30.63% | 38.27% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.31% | 15.43% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 20.96% | 27.20% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +361.55% | +3036.81% |
| CAGRi | +16.53% | +41.15% | |
| Volatilityi | 47.30% | 59.63% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.46 | 0.80 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.72 | 1.21 | |
| Max drawdowni | 58.45% | 73.63% | |
| Current drawdowni | 53.20% | 18.65% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 27.02% | 25.55% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 30.92% | 30.81% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.31% | 21.06% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.51% | 43.05% |
| Category | BYDDF | TSLA |
|---|---|---|
| Company | BYD Company Limited | Tesla, Inc. |
| Sector | Automotive | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Auto Manufacturers | Auto Manufacturers |
| Core business | A Chinese electric and hybrid vehicle manufacturer that also produces its own batteries and semiconductors, giving it deep vertical integration across the EV supply chain while selling a broad lineup of vehicles spanning affordable to premium price points. | A US-based electric vehicle manufacturer and clean energy company that designs, builds, and sells EVs alongside energy storage and solar products, while investing heavily in autonomous driving software and manufacturing automation. |
| Investor focus | Global vehicle delivery growth outside China, Blade Battery technology adoption, and the company's ability to navigate tariff barriers as it expands into new international markets. | Vehicle delivery growth trends, progress toward full self-driving and robotaxi ambitions, and margin trends as competition intensifies globally. |
- Deep vertical integration across batteries, semiconductors, and vehicle assembly reduces reliance on outside suppliers and supports cost control
- Broad vehicle lineup spanning affordable to premium segments captures a wider range of buyers than most single-brand competitors
- Proprietary Blade Battery technology offers a differentiated safety and cost proposition versus other lithium-ion battery chemistries
- Strong global brand recognition and a first-mover reputation in premium electric vehicles support pricing power in many markets
- Ongoing investment in autonomous driving software and AI represents a potential long-term differentiator beyond vehicle hardware
- Established Supercharger network and energy storage business provide diversification beyond core vehicle sales
- Faces tariff barriers and trade restrictions in key markets, including the United States, that limit its global expansion options
- Intense domestic price competition in China's crowded EV market pressures margins across its vehicle lineup
- International brand recognition still lags established automakers in many markets outside China and emerging economies
- Vehicle delivery growth has slowed as competition from Chinese and legacy automakers intensifies in key markets
- Valuation embeds significant expectations for future autonomous driving and robotaxi revenue that remain unproven at scale
- Faces growing price competition that pressures automotive gross margins across its vehicle lineup
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on BYDDF and TSLA. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside BYDDF and TSLA, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.