FSLR vs BE Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
First Solar and Bloom Energy are both clean energy technology companies but use fundamentally different approaches. First Solar makes solar panels for large utility-scale ground-mounted power plants; Bloom Energy makes fuel cells for on-site distributed power generation at individual facilities. Their customers, use cases, and competitive dynamics are entirely different.
FSLR vs BE is utility-scale solar panel manufacturing with IRA policy tailwind (First Solar) versus distributed on-site fuel cell power generation targeting data centers and critical facilities (Bloom Energy) — First Solar has more revenue visibility and profitability; Bloom offers data center power demand upside at higher risk.
FSLR and BE are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly. BE has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+1429.81% vs +79.08%), though FSLR trades at the lower forward P/E (11.41x vs 75.66x). Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for FSLR (-8.06%) than for BE (-19.84%).
- →prefer the US utility-scale solar manufacturer with IRA domestic content advantages and multi-year backlog visibility
- →value CadTel thin-film technology independence from Chinese polysilicon supply chain
- →want a profitable clean energy manufacturer with strong FCF from contracted backlog at known ASPs
- →are comfortable with IRA policy risk if future administrations reduce domestic content bonuses
- →prefer distributed fuel cell power generation targeting AI data center and critical facility on-site power needs
- →value Bloom's faster deployment advantage vs. utility-scale solar for data centers needing immediate power
- →want exposure to hydrogen-capable fuel cells as a long-duration bet on green hydrogen cost declines
- →are comfortable with ongoing operating losses and lumpy revenue as Bloom scales its Energy Server business
| Metric | FSLR | BE |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 50.9 | 61.6 |
| AI rank | #408 | #134 |
| Latest close | $257.70 | $328.91 |
| 1M return | +16.23% | +25.86% |
| 6M return | +1.44% | +327.32% |
| 1Y return | +79.08% | +1429.81% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | FSLR | BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $17.94K (+79.4%) started 2025-06-18 | $152.98K (+1429.8%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $32.96K (+229.6%) started 2021-06-21 | $133.43K (+1234.3%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $52.25K (+422.5%) started 2016-06-20 | $131.56K (+1215.6%) started 2018-07-25 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | FSLR | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $28.72B | $93.56B |
| Trailing P/E | 17.27 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 11.41 | 75.66 |
| Price/Sales | N/A | 38.20 |
| EV/Revenue | 4.96 | 32.82 |
| Analyst target | $245.77 | $263.65 |
| Target upside | -8.06% | -19.84% |
| Metric | FSLR | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 23.60% | 130.40% |
| Earnings growth | 65.10% | N/A |
| EPS growth | +65.10% | N/A |
| FCF margin | +21.18% | +10.84% |
| Operating margin | 33.07% | N/A |
| Profit margin | 30.73% | 0.25% |
| ROIC proxy | 18.44% | 1.29% |
| Return on equity | 18.44% | 1.29% |
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.00% |
| Beta | 1.69 | 3.75 |
| Debt/equity | 5.94 | 311.48 |
| Current ratio | 2.56 | 5.03 |
| Quick ratio | 1.91 | 3.98 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | FSLR | BE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +79.37% | +1429.81% |
| CAGR | +79.52% | +1432.67% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.25 | 3.03 | |
| Max drawdown | 35.10% | 45.94% | |
| Max daily drop | 13.61% | 18.28% | |
| Max wkly drop | 21.67% | 26.41% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +229.58% | +1234.32% |
| CAGR | +26.99% | +67.91% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.63 | 0.96 | |
| Max drawdown | 59.97% | 75.87% | |
| Max daily drop | 17.89% | 24.79% | |
| Max wkly drop | 21.67% | 40.25% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +422.51% | +1215.64% |
| CAGR | +17.99% | +38.58% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.49 | 0.76 | |
| Max drawdown | 61.26% | 92.54% | |
| Max daily drop | 17.89% | 42.50% | |
| Max wkly drop | 25.40% | 59.87% |
| Category | FSLR | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Company | First Solar, Inc. | Bloom Energy Corporation |
| Sector | Technology | Energy |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | First Solar manufactures CadTel thin-film solar panels for utility-scale solar power plants sold to utilities, independent power producers, and corporate buyers in the US, Europe, and Asia. Its US manufacturing (Ohio, Alabama) makes it the primary IRA domestic content beneficiary in the solar supply chain. First Solar's multi-year customer backlog of 70+ GW provides exceptional revenue visibility relative to most clean energy companies. | Bloom Energy manufactures solid oxide fuel cells (Energy Servers) that generate electricity on-site from natural gas, hydrogen, or biogas without combustion, producing electricity more efficiently and with lower emissions than grid power or backup generators. Its primary customers are data centers, hospitals, manufacturers, and utilities needing reliable on-site power. The AI data center power demand surge has increased Bloom's appeal as a faster-to-deploy baseload power alternative to grid-scale generation. |
| Investor focus | Investors track manufacturing capacity additions (GW per year), ASP trends in contracted backlog, domestic content bonus credit realization under the IRA, and Series 7 module efficiency improvements. | Investors track Energy Server shipment volumes and revenue growth, data center customer win rate as AI power demand surges, hydrogen fuel cell advancement (Bloom's solid oxide cells can run on hydrogen), and path to sustained profitability. |
- →IRA domestic content bonus credits are inaccessible to Chinese panel manufacturers, creating a durable US market competitive advantage
- →70+ GW customer backlog provides 3–4 years of forward revenue visibility highly unusual in clean energy manufacturing
- →CadTel technology uses no polysilicon, insulating First Solar from Chinese polysilicon supply chain vulnerabilities
- →Solid oxide fuel cell technology provides on-site baseload power generation faster to deploy than utility-scale solar or wind
- →AI data center power demand surge creates an urgent customer need for reliable distributed power that Bloom's Energy Servers can address
- →Hydrogen-capable fuel cells position Bloom for future hydrogen economy if green hydrogen costs decline sufficiently
- →IRA policy risk from future administrations could reduce or eliminate domestic content advantages
- →Module ASP trends downward over time as manufacturing efficiency improves — maintaining value requires constant technology advancement
- →Utility interconnection queue delays can push project timelines for customers, potentially affecting module delivery schedules
- →Natural gas dependency means Bloom's fuel cells are not zero-carbon without green hydrogen, limiting clean energy credentialing
- →Revenue growth has been lumpy and profitability elusive — significant operating losses continue as the company scales
- →Competition from backup diesel generators, battery storage, and utility-scale solar for data center power contracts
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.