CRWD vs TENB Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
CRWD and TENB both sell cybersecurity software but occupy different positions in the budget. CrowdStrike is a broad platform that customers expand across many modules, growing quickly with strong free cash flow and priced accordingly. Tenable is focused on vulnerability and exposure management, growing more slowly, with an established installed base and a much lower valuation. Platform breadth against focused value.
Use this CRWD vs TENB comparison to weigh consolidation risk. Security buyers have been consolidating onto fewer platforms, which favours vendors like CrowdStrike that can absorb adjacent categories. That same trend is the principal long-term risk to focused point-solution vendors, even when their products are good and their valuations are undemanding.
CRWD holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. CRWD has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+111.73% vs +13.26%), though TENB has the better forward P/E setup (15.67x vs 131.85x for CRWD). On fundamentals, CRWD is growing revenue faster (25.80%), while TENB maintains the higher operating margin (4.85%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies similar upside for both: +4.20% for CRWD and +3.24% for TENB.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want a leading security platform with high growth and strong free cash flow
- Believe single-agent module expansion will keep driving net retention
- Accept a premium valuation for category leadership
- Are comfortable competing against Microsoft's bundling strategy
- Prefer a lower valuation and an established installed base to high growth
- Believe exposure management remains a distinct, compliance-driven budget line
- Value predictable recurring revenue over expansion velocity
- Accept slower growth and platform consolidation as the main risks
| Metric | CRWD | TENB |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 62.8 | 30.6 |
| AI ranki | #103 | #2187 |
| Latest closei | $252.13 | $33.49 |
| 1M returni | +33.28% | -0.51% |
| 6M returni | +172.88% | +102.48% |
| 1Y returni | +111.73% | +13.26% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | CRWD | TENB |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $21.32K (+113.2%) started 2025-09-25 | $11.33K (+13.3%) started 2025-09-25 |
| 5Y ago | $39.81K (+298.1%) started 2021-09-27 | $7K (-30.0%) started 2021-09-27 |
| 10Y ago | $173.88K (+1638.8%) started 2019-06-12 | $11.07K (+10.7%) started 2018-07-26 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | CRWD | TENB |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $223.63B | $3.77B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 5460.00 | 570.67 |
| Forward P/Ei | 131.85 | 15.67 |
| Price/Salesi | 42.86 | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 40.67 | 3.86 |
| Analyst targeti | $227.58 | $35.35 |
| Target upsidei | +4.20% | +3.24% |
| Metric | CRWD | TENB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 25.80% | 8.60% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | +36.98% | +24.61% |
| Operating margini | -2.26% | 4.85% |
| Profit margini | 0.83% | 0.65% |
| ROIC proxyi | 1.46% | 2.46% |
| Return on equityi | 1.46% | 2.46% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 1.23 | 0.94 |
| Debt/equityi | 15.96 | 212.48 |
| Current ratioi | 1.57 | 0.79 |
| Quick ratioi | 1.37 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, CRWD and TENB have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.71), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | CRWD | TENB |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +113.18% | +13.26% |
| CAGRi | +113.41% | +13.27% | |
| Volatilityi | 54.81% | 58.30% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.57 | 0.43 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 2.62 | 0.66 | |
| Max drawdowni | 37.18% | 47.34% | |
| Current drawdowni | 3.95% | 21.48% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 11.92% | 19.50% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 15.60% | 23.02% | |
| Max daily dropi | 9.85% | 11.85% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 18.46% | 22.17% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +298.09% | -29.97% |
| CAGRi | +31.86% | -6.88% | |
| Volatilityi | 437.40% | 47.41% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.14 | -0.01 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 4.33 | -0.01 | |
| Max drawdowni | 74.94% | 74.40% | |
| Current drawdowni | 15.91% | 46.55% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 47.93% | 35.77% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 52.05% | 39.33% | |
| Max daily dropi | 74.75% | 19.14% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 74.83% | 26.04% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +1638.83% | +10.71% |
| CAGRi | +47.96% | +1.25% | |
| Volatilityi | 363.88% | 49.12% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.01 | 0.18 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 3.74 | 0.26 | |
| Max drawdowni | 74.94% | 74.40% | |
| Current drawdowni | 15.91% | 46.55% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 38.61% | 31.49% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 45.33% | 35.18% | |
| Max daily dropi | 74.75% | 19.14% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 74.83% | 27.32% |
| Category | CRWD | TENB |
|---|---|---|
| Company | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Tenable Holdings, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Core business | Cloud-native security platform delivered through a single lightweight agent, spanning endpoint detection and response, identity protection, cloud security, log management, and managed threat hunting. Customers expand by adding modules on the same agent. | Provider of vulnerability and exposure management, built on the Nessus scanning heritage, helping organisations find, prioritise, and track security weaknesses across systems, cloud, identity, and operational technology. |
| Investor focus | Annual recurring revenue growth, module adoption per customer, net retention, free cash flow margin, and competitive pressure from platform bundlers. | Recurring revenue growth, exposure management platform adoption, retention, margin expansion, and competition from broader platform vendors. |
- Single-agent architecture makes adding new security modules unusually easy, driving high net retention
- Recognised leader in endpoint detection with strong threat intelligence and brand trust
- Strong free cash flow generation alongside high growth, an uncommon combination
- Long-established position in vulnerability scanning with deep enterprise installed base
- Exposure management addresses a compliance-driven need that is hard to defer
- Trades at a far lower multiple than high-growth security platforms
- Premium valuation demands sustained high growth and expansion rates
- Competes with Microsoft bundling security into existing enterprise agreements
- The 2024 update incident showed how operational errors can damage trust and slow deal cycles
- Growth is considerably slower than platform leaders
- Vulnerability management is increasingly bundled into broader security platforms
- Less strategic influence in security budgets than detection and response vendors
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on CRWD and TENB. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside CRWD and TENB, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.