LZ vs LAW Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
LZ (LegalZoom) serves consumers and small businesses with affordable legal document and attorney services at the consumer end of legal needs, while LAW (CS Disco) provides AI-powered legal review technology to law firms and corporate legal departments for complex litigation and investigation matters. These companies serve very different segments of the legal services market.
LZ vs LAW contrasts consumer-and-SMB legal services democratization against enterprise-focused legal AI for professional law firms — different ends of the massive legal services market being disrupted by technology.
LAW holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. LAW has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-18.51% vs -30.49%), though LZ has the better forward P/E setup (8.02x vs -155.12x for LAW). On fundamentals, LAW is growing revenue faster (13.20%), while LZ maintains the higher operating margin (5.37%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for LAW (+28.95%) than for LZ (+17.65%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want exposure to the consumer legal services democratization trend serving small businesses and individuals who can't afford traditional attorneys
- Value LegalZoom's leading brand and large customer base for subscription legal service cross-selling opportunities
- See LegalZoom's transition from transactional document fees to subscription legal services as improving revenue quality and customer lifetime value
- Want AI legal technology exposure targeting law firms and corporate legal departments with compelling efficiency ROI
- Value CS Disco's cloud-native AI review platform as a modern alternative to legacy on-premise legal discovery systems
- See legal AI adoption as inevitable among litigation-heavy law firms and corporate legal departments seeking to reduce discovery costs
| Metric | LZ | LAW |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 23.5 | 23.6 |
| AI ranki | #3516 | #3485 |
| Latest closei | $6.93 | $5.15 |
| 1M returni | +23.75% | +23.21% |
| 3M returni | -16.00% | +26.54% |
| 6M returni | +2.06% | +5.97% |
| 1Y returni | -30.49% | -18.51% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | LZ | LAW |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $6.87K (-31.3%) started 2025-11-03 | $8.36K (-16.4%) started 2025-11-03 |
| 5Y ago | $2.56K (-74.4%) started 2021-11-03 | $917.35 (-90.8%) started 2021-11-03 |
| 10Y ago | $1.83K (-81.7%) started 2021-06-30 | $1.26K (-87.4%) started 2021-07-21 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | LZ | LAW |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $1.11B | $331.57M |
| Trailing P/Ei | 71.78 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 8.02 | -155.12 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 1.98 |
| EV/Revenuei | 1.14 | 1.44 |
| Analyst targeti | $7.60 | $6.67 |
| Target upsidei | +17.65% | +28.95% |
| Metric | LZ | LAW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 6.60% | 13.20% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | +15.74% | +2.67% |
| Operating margini | 5.37% | -21.36% |
| Profit margini | 2.13% | -24.20% |
| ROIC proxyi | 10.49% | -31.34% |
| Return on equityi | 10.49% | -31.34% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 0.00% |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 1.29 | 1.76 |
| Debt/equityi | 11.90 | 4.71 |
| Current ratioi | 0.67 | 3.77 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.62 | 3.67 |
Over the past year, LZ and LAW have moved weakly in the same direction (correlation of 0.36), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | LZ | LAW |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -31.32% | -16.40% |
| CAGRi | -31.41% | -16.45% | |
| Volatilityi | 60.60% | 75.57% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.37 | 0.09 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.46 | 0.12 | |
| Max drawdowni | 50.32% | 69.02% | |
| Current drawdowni | 36.60% | 42.20% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 33.99% | 43.48% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 36.92% | 47.83% | |
| Max daily dropi | 30.06% | 19.65% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 35.24% | 37.58% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -74.44% | -90.83% |
| CAGRi | -23.89% | -38.00% | |
| Volatilityi | 59.58% | 72.22% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.23 | -0.34 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.33 | -0.44 | |
| Max drawdowni | 79.97% | 95.20% | |
| Current drawdowni | 74.44% | 91.04% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 63.65% | 82.37% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 64.63% | 84.10% | |
| Max daily dropi | 30.06% | 53.63% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 35.24% | 51.50% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -81.69% | -87.44% |
| CAGRi | -27.23% | -32.47% | |
| Volatilityi | 59.27% | 72.37% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.31 | -0.22 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.44 | -0.28 | |
| Max drawdowni | 86.37% | 95.81% | |
| Current drawdowni | 82.61% | 92.18% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 71.47% | 80.68% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 73.35% | 83.59% | |
| Max daily dropi | 30.06% | 53.63% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 35.24% | 51.50% |
| Category | LZ | LAW |
|---|---|---|
| Company | LegalZoom.com, Inc. | CS Disco, Inc. |
| Sector | Industrials | Technology - Legal AI Platform |
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Software - Application |
| Core business | LegalZoom provides affordable online legal services to consumers and small businesses, offering DIY legal document preparation (LLCs, wills, trademarks, contracts), attorney subscription services, and compliance services to help individuals and small businesses handle legal needs without traditional law firm rates. | CS Disco provides AI-native legal review and case management software for law firms and corporate legal departments, helping attorneys efficiently review large volumes of documents in litigation discovery, investigations, and compliance matters. |
| Investor focus | Investors track LegalZoom's subscription revenue growth (attorney access, compliance monitoring), transaction revenue from legal documents, customer lifetime value, and the transition from transactional to higher-recurring subscription revenue. | Investors track CS Disco's annual recurring revenue (ARR), net revenue retention, expansion in legal and corporate legal department accounts, and the adoption of its AI review capabilities as law firms and corporate legal departments modernize discovery workflows. |
- Market leader in consumer and small business legal self-help — the dominant brand for DIY legal document preparation in the U.S.
- Subscription attorney services provide recurring revenue as small businesses seek ongoing legal guidance at affordable prices
- Large customer base of small business owners provides cross-sell opportunities for compliance, tax, and additional legal services
- AI-powered document review dramatically reduces the time and cost of litigation discovery — law firms spend hundreds of hours manually reviewing documents that Disco's AI can process much faster
- Cloud-native architecture provides deployment flexibility for law firms and corporate legal departments without on-premise infrastructure investment
- Legal discovery is a mandatory and expensive process in litigation — software that reduces discovery cost has compelling ROI for law firm clients
- Freemium competition from online tools and AI document drafting could commoditize simple legal document preparation
- Attorney services must maintain quality assurance while delivering legal guidance at prices significantly below traditional law firms
- Market positioning between DIY (free tools) and traditional law firms requires constant value proposition reinforcement
- Legal technology adoption can be slow — law firms have conservative cultures and significant technology adoption barriers
- Competition from established legal technology providers (Relativity, Reveal, Nuix) and new AI-first competitors entering the discovery technology market
- CS Disco has faced revenue growth deceleration as legal market conditions and discretionary technology spending tightened
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on LZ and LAW. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside LZ and LAW, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.