LIVE
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc. · Industrials - Utility & Energy Infrastructure
$702.25
-1.66% this month
VERSUS
⟷
COMPARE
MYRG
MYR Group Inc. · Industrials - Electrical Construction
$461.10
+4.63% this month
Scoreboard verdict
Across AI score, momentum, valuation, upside, operating margin
PWR
2
MYRG
2
Comparison scoreboard
MIXED SETUPAI Score
PWR ✓78.8
MYRG 65.1
1Y Return
PWR +95.82%
MYRG ✓+174.55%
Fwd P/E
PWR 43.00
MYRG ✓34.98
Target Up.
PWR ✓+7.58%
MYRG -1.32%
Op. Margin
PWR 4.24%
MYRG N/A
Metrics last refreshed: 6/20/2026
Quick take
PWR vs MYRG Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
PWR (Quanta Services) and MYRG (MYR Group) are both electrical infrastructure contractors benefiting from grid modernization, renewable energy buildout, and data center construction — Quanta is the largest and most diversified specialty contractor with scale advantages across electric, gas, and telecom utilities, while MYR Group is a focused electrical contractor with strong data center exposure in its commercial segment and utility relationships in its T&D business.
PWR vs MYRG is scale leader in electrical infrastructure (Quanta's vast workforce, equipment fleet, and geographic reach making it the contractor of choice for the largest grid modernization and renewable energy projects) versus focused electrical contractor (MYR Group's specialized T&D and C&I electrical expertise with meaningful data center construction exposure in a smaller, more concentrated business) — diversified giant versus focused specialist in electrical construction.
Live analysis · updated 6/20/2026
PWR and MYRG are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly. MYRG leads on both 1-year return (+174.55%) and forward P/E (34.98x vs 43.00x for PWR), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for PWR (+7.58%) than for MYRG (-1.32%).
Normalized 1Y performance
PWR
MYRG
Recent returns
PWR
MYRG
Analyst price targets & sentiment
PWR · 25 analysts
STRONG BUYHOLDSTRONG SELL
Buy (1.8/5.0)
Price target range
analyst low$210.00
analyst mean$761.35
current price$702.25
+7.6% upside to analyst mean
MYRG · 6 analysts
Price target range
analyst low$295.00
analyst high$564.00
analyst mean$455.00
current price$461.10
-1.3% upside to analyst mean
Who should consider this stock?
PWR may suit investors who:
- →Want the dominant beneficiary of the multi-decade electrical grid modernization investment cycle — Quanta's scale, workforce, and relationships make it the contractor utilities call for the largest transmission and distribution projects
- →Value Quanta's diversification across electric, natural gas, renewable energy, and telecom providing multiple avenues for growth across different energy transition tailwinds
- →Prefer Quanta's larger scale and established track record for electrical infrastructure exposure versus smaller contractor alternatives
MYRG may suit investors who:
- →Want a smaller electrical infrastructure play with high data center electrical construction exposure — MYR Group's C&I segment captures meaningful revenue from the AI data center construction boom
- →Value MYR's focused electrical construction expertise in utility T&D and commercial/industrial as creating depth in specific markets versus Quanta's broader contractor portfolio
- →Accept MYR's smaller scale and more concentrated exposure in exchange for potential valuation discount versus large-cap infrastructure peers
Performance & AI score
| Metric | PWR | MYRG |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 78.8 | 65.1 |
| AI rank | #11 | #65 |
| Latest close | $702.25 | $461.10 |
| 1M return | -1.66% | +4.63% |
| 6M return | +69.52% | +117.35% |
| 1Y return | +95.82% | +174.55% |
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | PWR | MYRG |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $19.48K (+94.8%) started 2025-06-18 | $27.45K (+174.5%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $80.81K (+708.1%) started 2021-06-21 | $53.1K (+431.0%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $310.95K (+3009.5%) started 2016-06-20 | $191.73K (+1817.3%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
Valuation & upside potential
| Metric | PWR | MYRG |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $106.2B | $7.18B |
| Trailing P/E | 97.08 | 50.78 |
| Forward P/E | 43.00 | 34.98 |
| Price/Sales | 2.15 | 1.88 |
| EV/Revenue | 3.73 | 1.79 |
| Analyst target | $761.35 | $455.00 |
| Target upside | +7.58% | -1.32% |
Growth, profitability & risk
| Metric | PWR | MYRG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 26.30% | 20.00% |
| Earnings growth | 51.00% | 106.20% |
| EPS growth | +51.00% | +106.20% |
| FCF margin | +3.44% | +5.96% |
| Operating margin | 4.24% | N/A |
| Profit margin | 3.67% | 3.71% |
| ROIC proxy | 13.53% | 22.68% |
| Return on equity | 13.53% | 22.68% |
| Dividend yield | 0.06% | 0.00% |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.32 |
| Debt/equity | 69.12 | 8.75 |
| Current ratio | 1.14 | 1.31 |
| Quick ratio | 1.02 | 1.25 |
Drawdown & downside risk
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
1Y risk snapshot
PWR max drawdown17.11%
MYRG max drawdown14.97%
PWR max wkly drop10.38%
MYRG max wkly drop11.26%
5Y risk snapshot
PWR max drawdown33.89%
MYRG max drawdown50.29%
PWR max wkly drop17.88%
MYRG max wkly drop33.71%
10Y risk snapshot
PWR max drawdown45.53%
MYRG max drawdown61.52%
PWR max wkly drop24.31%
MYRG max wkly drop34.65%
Performance metrics by period
| Period | Metric | PWR | MYRG |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +94.84% | +174.55% |
| CAGR | +95.02% | +174.74% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.86 | 2.35 | |
| Max drawdown | 17.11% | 14.97% | |
| Max daily drop | 6.17% | 6.02% | |
| Max wkly drop | 10.38% | 11.26% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +702.07% | +430.98% |
| CAGR | +51.75% | +39.65% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.22 | 0.90 | |
| Max drawdown | 33.89% | 50.29% | |
| Max daily drop | 18.32% | 22.41% | |
| Max wkly drop | 17.88% | 33.71% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +2951.97% | +1817.26% |
| CAGR | +40.78% | +34.39% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.05 | 0.79 | |
| Max drawdown | 45.53% | 61.52% | |
| Max daily drop | 18.32% | 22.41% | |
| Max wkly drop | 24.31% | 34.65% |
Business comparison
| Category | PWR | MYRG |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Quanta Services, Inc. | MYR Group Inc. |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials - Electrical Construction |
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | N/A |
| Core business | Quanta Services is the largest specialty contractor providing electrical, natural gas, renewable energy, and pipeline infrastructure services across North America. Quanta builds and maintains electric transmission and distribution lines, constructs solar and wind farms, installs EV charging infrastructure, lays natural gas pipelines, and provides emergency restoration services after storms. Quanta serves utilities, independent power producers, and government clients. | MYR Group is a specialty electrical construction company providing services through two segments: Transmission and Distribution (T&D) serving electric utilities with high-voltage power line construction and maintenance, and Commercial and Industrial (C&I) serving construction of electrical systems for commercial buildings, industrial facilities, and data centers. MYR operates across the U.S. and Canada. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Quanta's backlog (forward order visibility), revenue mix across segments (Electric Power is largest), operating margin, acquisition strategy to expand capabilities and geography, and the long-term tailwind from grid modernization and renewable energy buildout requiring massive construction spending. | Investors track MYR Group's T&D and C&I segment revenue and margins, backlog growth as an indicator of future revenue, data center electrical construction revenue growth, and bid pipeline as a signal of pricing and demand in the electrical construction market. |
PWR strengths
- →Electric grid modernization leadership — utilities are spending hundreds of billions to upgrade aging transmission and distribution infrastructure; Quanta's scale, equipment fleet, and licensed electrician workforce are difficult to replicate
- →Renewable energy construction expertise — Quanta builds solar farms, wind farms, and their interconnection to the grid; as utilities shift from fossil fuels to renewables, Quanta benefits from both decommissioning old generation and installing new clean energy
- →Diversified end markets across electric, natural gas, and telecom — this diversification allows Quanta to allocate labor and equipment to whichever segment has the highest demand, smoothing overall results
MYRG strengths
- →Data center electrical construction expertise — MYR Group's C&I segment has significant exposure to the data center construction boom, providing electrical systems and power distribution for AI compute facilities
- →Utility T&D relationships — MYR's T&D segment has long-standing relationships with electric utilities across the U.S., providing maintenance and construction of transmission and distribution infrastructure
- →Smaller and more nimble than large competitors — MYR's focused strategy allows it to win contracts in its specific electrical construction niche without the overhead of highly diversified contractors
Risks to watch — PWR
- →Labor intensity and skilled tradesman availability — Quanta's work requires large numbers of licensed electricians and specialized equipment operators; labor availability constraints can limit revenue growth in peak demand periods
- →Weather-related work variability — emergency storm restoration work provides high-margin revenue but is inherently unpredictable; severe winter weather can also disrupt normal construction scheduling
- →Integration of acquisitions — Quanta has made numerous acquisitions to expand capabilities and geography; integration risk and acquisition cost discipline are ongoing investor concerns
Risks to watch — MYRG
- →Scale disadvantage versus Quanta and other large specialty contractors — MYR is significantly smaller than Quanta; larger projects may require financial guarantees or bonding capacity that MYR cannot match at the same scale
- →Commercial and industrial construction cycle sensitivity — the C&I segment is more sensitive to commercial real estate and industrial investment cycles than the utility T&D work, which is driven by regulated utility spending
- →Concentration in electrical construction — unlike diversified contractors, MYR's focus on electrical construction means a downturn in electrical construction spending affects MYR disproportionately
Frequently asked questions
Free public comparison
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons →