FUBO vs DIS Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
fuboTV and Disney both offer sports-related streaming exposure, but fuboTV is a small, focused live sports streaming challenger built as a cable alternative, while Disney is a massive, diversified entertainment conglomerate combining theme parks, film and television franchises, profitable streaming services, and ESPN's established sports media business.
fuboTV offers concentrated, higher-risk exposure to the live sports streaming shift as a cable alternative, while Disney offers diversified, established exposure across entertainment, theme parks, streaming, and sports media through ESPN. Consider whether you prefer fuboTV's focused sports streaming bet or Disney's broad entertainment diversification.
DIS holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. DIS leads on both 1-year return (-9.26%) and forward P/E quality (14.52x vs 24.14x for FUBO), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, FUBO is growing revenue faster (38.00%), while DIS maintains the higher operating margin (19.30%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for FUBO (+51.11%) than for DIS (+18.26%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want concentrated exposure to live sports streaming as an alternative to traditional cable television
- Believe the broader cord-cutting trend will continue driving subscriber growth for sports-focused streaming
- Are comfortable with high content licensing costs and thin margins in exchange for growth potential
- Accept the risk of a smaller, single-category company facing larger, more diversified competitors
- Want diversified exposure across theme parks, film and television franchises, streaming, and sports media
- Value Disney's unmatched portfolio of globally recognized entertainment franchises
- Believe Disney+'s path to sustained profitability alongside durable theme park revenue supports long-term value
- Prefer a large, diversified entertainment conglomerate over a narrow, single-category streaming challenger
| Metric | FUBO | DIS |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 23.7 | 41.1 |
| AI ranki | #3601 | #1086 |
| Latest closei | $9.90 | $105.35 |
| 1M returni | -0.90% | +1.35% |
| 6M returni | -28.26% | +6.20% |
| 1Y returni | -80.40% | -9.26% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | FUBO | DIS |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $1.96K (-80.4%) started 2025-09-17 | $9.17K (-8.3%) started 2025-09-18 |
| 5Y ago | $291.73 (-97.1%) started 2021-09-17 | $6.05K (-39.5%) started 2021-09-20 |
| 10Y ago | $825.83 (-91.7%) started 2019-03-27 | $12.93K (+29.3%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | FUBO | DIS |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $339.8M | $186.65B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 2.93 | 22.29 |
| Forward P/Ei | 24.14 | 14.52 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 2.18 |
| EV/Revenuei | 0.41 | 2.37 |
| Analyst targeti | $17.00 | $127.84 |
| Target upsidei | +51.11% | +18.26% |
| Metric | FUBO | DIS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 38.00% | 6.80% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | -48.30% |
| EPS growthi | N/A | -48.30% |
| FCF margini | -1.91% | +4.92% |
| Operating margini | -1.80% | 19.30% |
| Profit margini | -0.96% | 8.70% |
| ROIC proxyi | -5.05% | 8.01% |
| Return on equityi | -5.05% | 8.01% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 1.39% |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 30.93% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | 1 yr |
| Betai | 2.40 | 1.40 |
| Debt/equityi | 15.26 | 39.40 |
| Current ratioi | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.95 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, FUBO and DIS have moved weakly in the same direction (correlation of 0.16), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | FUBO | DIS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -80.40% | -8.28% |
| CAGRi | -80.43% | -8.29% | |
| Volatilityi | 78.06% | 26.51% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -1.76 | -0.36 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -2.41 | -0.50 | |
| Max drawdowni | 85.22% | 20.77% | |
| Current drawdowni | 81.91% | 9.69% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 60.14% | 9.42% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 65.61% | 10.76% | |
| Max daily dropi | 22.03% | 7.75% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 34.39% | 10.27% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -97.08% | -40.29% |
| CAGRi | -50.69% | -9.81% | |
| Volatilityi | 145.12% | 29.62% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.06 | -0.35 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.15 | -0.49 | |
| Max drawdowni | 98.01% | 55.59% | |
| Current drawdowni | 97.56% | 40.29% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 87.76% | 39.27% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 89.51% | 40.78% | |
| Max daily dropi | 23.12% | 13.16% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 37.48% | 16.34% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -91.74% | +21.16% |
| CAGRi | -28.36% | +1.94% | |
| Volatilityi | 137.22% | 29.04% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.21 | 0.06 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.45 | 0.08 | |
| Max drawdowni | 98.91% | 60.72% | |
| Current drawdowni | 98.67% | 47.18% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 74.26% | 27.22% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 80.09% | 34.34% | |
| Max daily dropi | 29.41% | 13.16% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 46.76% | 19.45% |
| Category | FUBO | DIS |
|---|---|---|
| Company | fuboTV Inc. | The Walt Disney Company |
| Sector | Communication Services | Communication Services |
| Industry | Broadcasting | Entertainment |
| Core business | A live TV streaming service focused primarily on sports programming, offering a virtual pay-TV bundle that includes major sports networks and channels as an alternative to traditional cable television. | A global entertainment conglomerate operating theme parks, film and television studios, and streaming services including Disney+, alongside ESPN's sports media business, spanning some of the most valuable franchise content in entertainment. |
| Investor focus | Subscriber growth, average revenue per user (ARPU), and sports content licensing costs relative to subscription pricing. | Streaming segment profitability (Disney+ and Hulu), theme park revenue and attendance trends, and ESPN's sports media strategy including streaming transition. |
- Focused positioning as a live sports-first streaming alternative to traditional cable television bundles
- Benefits from the broader cord-cutting trend as consumers seek streaming alternatives to cable for live sports
- Growing advertising revenue opportunity alongside its core subscription business
- Unmatched portfolio of globally recognized entertainment franchises spanning film, television, and theme parks
- Disney+ streaming service has become profitable, complementing durable theme park and experiences revenue
- ESPN provides established sports media leadership with a large, loyal audience and valuable sports rights
- High content licensing costs for live sports programming create ongoing margin pressure
- Much smaller scale than Disney, with a more narrowly focused, single-category content strategy
- Faces increasing competition from other streaming services and traditional media companies also offering live sports
- Streaming segment competition remains intense, requiring continued content investment to sustain subscriber growth
- Theme park and experiences revenue can be sensitive to broader consumer discretionary spending trends
- ESPN's own streaming transition strategy carries execution risk as it navigates a changing sports media landscape
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.