EA vs UBFT Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Electronic Arts and Ubisoft are both major global video game publishers, but Electronic Arts has built its franchise around annual sports titles and a growing live-service model, while Ubisoft is known for large single-player and open-world franchises alongside its own live-service ambitions.
EA offers exposure to durable annual sports franchises with a maturing live-service revenue model, while UBFT offers exposure to a broad open-world franchise portfolio navigating ongoing strategic and execution challenges. The decision depends on whether you prefer franchise stability or turnaround potential, and investors should verify Ubisoft's current listing status before comparing.
EA and UBFT are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want exposure to durable annual sports franchises with exclusive league licenses
- Value a growing live-service and in-game spending revenue model
- Believe a diversified portfolio across genres reduces single-franchise dependence
- Prefer a more established, stable game publisher over a turnaround story
- Want exposure to a portfolio of well-known open-world game franchises
- Are comfortable with a company navigating historical execution challenges around major releases
- Believe ongoing strategic initiatives can improve profitability and capital allocation over time
- Are comfortable researching current listing status and financial disclosures before investing
| Metric | EA | UBFT |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 40.7 | N/A |
| AI ranki | #1117 | N/A |
| Latest closei | $209.70 | N/A |
| 1M returni | +1.59% | N/A |
| 6M returni | +4.85% | N/A |
| 1Y returni | +25.09% | N/A |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | EA | UBFT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $11.91K (+19.1%) started 2025-08-11 | N/A |
| 5Y ago | $15.82K (+58.2%) started 2021-08-11 | N/A |
| 10Y ago | $28.31K (+183.1%) started 2016-08-11 | N/A |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | EA | UBFT |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $52.93B | N/A |
| Trailing P/Ei | 59.74 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 21.78 | N/A |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 6.68 | N/A |
| Analyst targeti | $205.46 | N/A |
| Target upsidei | -2.02% | N/A |
| Metric | EA | UBFT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 18.90% | N/A |
| Earnings growthi | 97.50% | N/A |
| EPS growthi | +97.50% | N/A |
| FCF margini | +21.57% | N/A |
| Operating margini | 25.88% | N/A |
| Profit margini | 13.80% | N/A |
| ROIC proxyi | 16.46% | N/A |
| Return on equityi | 16.46% | N/A |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.36% | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 17.76% | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | N/A |
| Betai | 0.64 | N/A |
| Debt/equityi | 26.43 | N/A |
| Current ratioi | 1.21 | N/A |
| Quick ratioi | 1.05 | N/A |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | EA | UBFT |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +19.07% | N/A |
| CAGRi | +19.16% | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | 17.77% | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.82 | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | 2.01 | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | 7.25% | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | 0.10% | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | 1.26% | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 1.92% | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | 3.86% | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | 4.17% | N/A | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +54.85% | N/A |
| CAGRi | +9.14% | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | 23.58% | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.30 | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.42 | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | 30.54% | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | 0.10% | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | 8.75% | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 10.97% | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | 16.70% | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | 18.67% | N/A | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +176.12% | N/A |
| CAGRi | +10.69% | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | 27.59% | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.34 | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.49 | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | 49.83% | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | 0.10% | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | 12.49% | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 17.02% | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | 16.70% | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | 18.67% | N/A |
| Category | EA | UBFT |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Electronic Arts Inc. | Ubisoft Entertainment SA |
| Sector | Communication Services | Gaming |
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | N/A |
| Core business | A global video game publisher known for annual sports franchises, live-service games, and a broad portfolio spanning console, PC, and mobile titles across multiple genres. | A global video game publisher and developer known for large open-world franchises and a broad portfolio spanning console, PC, and mobile titles across multiple genres and geographies. |
| Investor focus | Live-service and recurring in-game spending growth, engagement trends across its flagship sports and shooter franchises, and margin trends from its shift toward digital distribution. | Success of major franchise releases and their live-service monetization, progress on strategic and capital structure initiatives, and overall profitability improvement efforts. |
- Long-standing sports game franchises with exclusive league licenses provide durable, recurring annual revenue and strong brand loyalty
- Growing live-service and in-game spending model supports higher-margin recurring revenue beyond initial game sales
- Diversified portfolio spanning sports, shooters, and other genres reduces reliance on any single franchise for overall performance
- Portfolio of well-known open-world franchises provides a recognizable brand base with global player appeal
- Diversified game development studios across multiple countries support a broad pipeline of potential releases
- Ongoing strategic initiatives aim to streamline the business and improve capital allocation and profitability
- Success remains dependent on maintaining player engagement and content pipelines for key live-service and franchise titles
- Faces competition from a broad range of game publishers and evolving player preferences across platforms and genres
- Renewal risk around sports league licensing agreements could affect the economics of key franchise titles over time
- Historical execution challenges around major game launches have affected investor confidence in release timing and quality
- Faces competition from a broad range of game publishers and evolving player preferences across platforms and genres
- As a company that has undergone significant strategic and ownership discussions in recent years, investors should confirm its current listing status and financial disclosures
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.