RENT vs W Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
RENT is a niche fashion subscription company addressing sustainability-conscious consumers who want designer clothing access without ownership, while W (Wayfair) is the dominant online home goods marketplace — these companies serve very different consumer needs and are rarely compared directly, likely appearing together in screens for consumer discretionary e-commerce stocks.
RENT vs W contrasts a small-cap niche fashion rental subscription business against the dominant large-scale online home goods marketplace, illustrating the wide spectrum of consumer e-commerce business models.
W holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. W has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+15.92% vs -63.10% for RENT). On fundamentals, RENT is growing revenue faster (20.80%), while W maintains the higher operating margin (3.01%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want exposure to a unique designer fashion subscription model with sustainability tailwinds
- Believe fashion rental subscription is an underpenetrated market with long-term growth potential
- Are comfortable with higher execution risk in a newer consumer subscription model
- Want the dominant online home goods retail exposure with proven scale and logistics infrastructure
- Believe housing market recovery will drive renewed home goods purchasing demand
- See value in Wayfair's path to profitability as revenue scales over its fixed logistics cost base
| Metric | RENT | W |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 21.2 | 39.7 |
| AI ranki | #4945 | #1211 |
| Latest closei | $1.86 | $102.46 |
| 1M returni | -50.27% | -4.95% |
| 6M returni | -58.39% | +41.62% |
| 1Y returni | -63.10% | +15.92% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | RENT | W |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $3.69K (-63.1%) started 2025-09-18 | $11.47K (+14.7%) started 2025-09-19 |
| 5Y ago | $48.21 (-99.5%) started 2021-10-27 | $3.65K (-63.5%) started 2021-09-20 |
| 10Y ago | $48.21 (-99.5%) started 2021-10-27 | $24.65K (+146.5%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | RENT | W |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $63.11M | $12.95B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 0.14 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | N/A | 24.41 |
| Price/Salesi | 0.17 | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 0.63 | 1.19 |
| Analyst targeti | N/A | $123.31 |
| Target upsidei | N/A | +30.43% |
| Metric | RENT | W |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 20.80% | 7.50% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | -12.04% | +3.65% |
| Operating margini | -7.27% | 3.01% |
| Profit margini | 11.80% | -2.49% |
| ROIC proxyi | N/A | N/A |
| Return on equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.00% | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 1.18 | 2.98 |
| Debt/equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Current ratioi | 0.67 | 0.74 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.44 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, RENT and W have moved barely in the same direction (correlation of 0.10), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | RENT | W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -63.10% | +14.72% |
| CAGRi | -63.12% | +14.77% | |
| Volatilityi | 78.09% | 71.95% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.94 | 0.48 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -1.30 | 0.79 | |
| Max drawdowni | 80.19% | 51.78% | |
| Current drawdowni | 80.19% | 13.94% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 38.66% | 21.44% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 45.38% | 25.79% | |
| Max daily dropi | 21.22% | 13.02% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 49.28% | 17.81% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -99.52% | -63.49% |
| CAGRi | -66.39% | -18.27% | |
| Volatilityi | 133.95% | 81.69% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.29 | 0.10 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.52 | 0.15 | |
| Max drawdowni | 99.52% | 91.54% | |
| Current drawdowni | 99.52% | 64.09% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 89.75% | 73.82% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 91.02% | 75.86% | |
| Max daily dropi | 38.74% | 25.68% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 49.28% | 42.03% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -99.52% | +146.54% |
| CAGRi | -66.39% | +9.45% | |
| Volatilityi | 133.95% | 75.62% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.29 | 0.43 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.52 | 0.66 | |
| Max drawdowni | 99.52% | 93.01% | |
| Current drawdowni | 99.52% | 70.34% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 89.75% | 48.00% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 91.02% | 58.80% | |
| Max daily dropi | 38.74% | 26.68% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 49.28% | 45.34% |
| Category | RENT | W |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Rent the Runway, Inc. | Wayfair Inc. |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary - Fashion Subscription | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Apparel Retail | Internet Retail |
| Core business | Rent the Runway provides a subscription service for renting designer clothing, shoes, and accessories, allowing members to access a rotating wardrobe of premium fashion without purchasing items outright. | Wayfair is the largest dedicated online home goods retailer in the United States, offering an enormous selection of furniture, decor, and home products from thousands of suppliers through a dropship and direct fulfillment model. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Rent the Runway's active subscriber count, revenue per subscriber, and the company's path toward sustainable profitability as it manages fashion inventory costs and customer acquisition. | Investors track Wayfair's active customer count and spend per customer, order growth, and the path to sustained profitability as revenue scales over its logistics infrastructure investment. |
- Unique subscription model for designer fashion access provides a differentiated value proposition for fashion-conscious consumers
- Sustainable fashion angle resonates with consumers reducing clothing consumption and waste
- Relationships with luxury and designer brands for inventory sourcing provide exclusive access
- Largest online home goods marketplace with the broadest selection of furniture, decor, and home products
- Autoship and repeat purchase dynamics for home consumables create recurring customer relationships
- CastleGate logistics network reduces delivery times for heavy goods while improving economics
- Subscriber count has fluctuated significantly as the company works to find a sustainable retention and acquisition balance
- High inventory cost and logistics complexity make the rental fashion model operationally challenging
- Fashion rental is not yet a proven sustainable business model at scale, with ongoing questions about path to profitability
- Home goods demand is sensitive to the housing market, which has been pressured by high mortgage rates
- Sustained losses require continued access to capital markets while working toward profitability
- Amazon and specialty retailers continue to compete aggressively for online home goods spending
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.