ALEX vs CRR Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Alexander & Baldwin and CARBO Ceramics are both niche, asset-heavy companies whose value depends on a distinctive land or material position: Alexander & Baldwin monetizes a concentrated Hawaii real estate and land portfolio, while CARBO Ceramics depends on ceramic proppant demand tied to oil and gas drilling cycles.
Alexander & Baldwin offers exposure to a scarce, geographically constrained real estate franchise with a legacy land bank to monetize, while CARBO Ceramics offers a leveraged, cyclical bet on hydraulic fracturing completion intensity and ceramic proppant adoption. Consider whether you prefer real estate scarcity value or commodity-cycle materials exposure.
ALEX and CRR are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly.
- Want concentrated exposure to Hawaii's supply-constrained commercial real estate market
- Believe legacy land and agricultural holdings represent an underappreciated source of future value
- Are comfortable with single-state geographic concentration in exchange for a hard-to-replicate real estate position
- Seek REIT-style income supported by long-term island tenant relationships
- Want leveraged exposure to hydraulic fracturing completion intensity and proppant demand
- Believe ceramic proppant's performance advantages can defend share against cheaper sand alternatives
- Are comfortable with high cyclicality tied to North American oil and gas drilling activity
- Are seeking a small, specialized materials company with turnaround or niche-market potential
| Metric | ALEX | CRR |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | N/A | N/A |
| AI rank | N/A | N/A |
| Latest close | N/A | N/A |
| 1M return | N/A | N/A |
| 6M return | N/A | N/A |
| 1Y return | N/A | N/A |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | ALEX | CRR |
|---|
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | ALEX | CRR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | N/A | N/A |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/E | N/A | N/A |
| Price/Sales | 7.35 | N/A |
| EV/Revenue | N/A | N/A |
| Analyst target | N/A | N/A |
| Target upside | N/A | N/A |
| Metric | ALEX | CRR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | N/A | N/A |
| Earnings growth | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growth | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margin | N/A | N/A |
| Operating margin | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margin | N/A | N/A |
| ROIC proxy | N/A | N/A |
| Return on equity | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend yield | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | 0.20 | N/A |
| Debt/equity | N/A | N/A |
| Current ratio | N/A | N/A |
| Quick ratio | N/A | N/A |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | ALEX | CRR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratio | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdown | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily drop | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly drop | N/A | N/A | |
| 5Y | Growth | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratio | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdown | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily drop | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly drop | N/A | N/A | |
| 10Y | Growth | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratio | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdown | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily drop | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly drop | N/A | N/A |
| Category | ALEX | CRR |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. | CARBO Ceramics Inc. |
| Sector | Real Estate | Materials |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | A Hawaii-focused real estate investment trust that owns and operates commercial properties across the islands while continuing to monetize legacy agricultural landholdings accumulated over more than a century of operating history. | A materials manufacturer that historically supplied ceramic proppant used in hydraulic fracturing to prop open fractures in oil and gas wells, a niche industrial position tied closely to North American drilling activity. |
| Investor focus | Occupancy and rent growth across its Hawaii commercial portfolio, pace and pricing of legacy land sales, and the durability of its island-market real estate moat. | Hydraulic fracturing completion intensity, proppant pricing relative to cheaper sand alternatives, and the company's ability to diversify beyond a shrinking core oilfield market. |
- Owns a concentrated, hard-to-replicate portfolio of commercial real estate across the Hawaiian islands, where new supply is constrained by geography and zoning
- Retains a large legacy land bank that can be monetized opportunistically to fund reinvestment or return capital to shareholders
- Operates as a REIT with long tenant relationships in grocery-anchored and industrial properties across its home market
- Holds specialized manufacturing know-how in ceramic proppant technology that is difficult for new entrants to replicate quickly
- Benefits directly when drillers favor higher-performance ceramic proppant over cheaper sand in more demanding well completions
- Small, asset-heavy footprint gives it optionality to redeploy plant capacity toward adjacent industrial materials markets
- Revenue is concentrated in a single state, leaving results exposed to Hawaii-specific tourism, population, and economic cycles
- Legacy land and agricultural asset monetization is inherently episodic and does not provide a steady, repeatable revenue stream
- Higher interest rates raise financing costs for a REIT that relies on debt to fund acquisitions and development
- Faces intense competition from lower-cost sand proppant that has captured significant market share in well completions
- Revenue is highly cyclical and tied directly to volatile North American oil and gas drilling and completion activity
- A small, niche materials company carries limited scale and pricing power compared to larger diversified industrial suppliers
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.