ASTS vs RKLB Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
AST SpaceMobile and Rocket Lab both operate in commercial space but in entirely different business segments. AST SpaceMobile is a telecommunications company building a space-based cellular network for smartphone users. Rocket Lab is a launch vehicle and spacecraft component company providing launch services and space hardware. Both are pre-profitability growth stories with significant capital requirements.
ASTS vs RKLB is space-based cellular broadband connecting existing smartphones directly (AST SpaceMobile) versus small satellite launch services and spacecraft components (Rocket Lab) — both are speculative pre-profitability space companies but in different sectors of the commercial space economy.
RKLB holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. RKLB leads on both 1-year return (+285.06%) and forward P/E (-6103.59x vs -393.08x for ASTS), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. Analyst consensus implies similar upside for both: +1.00% for ASTS and -0.30% for RKLB.
- →prefer a satellite broadband network targeting direct-to-smartphone connectivity with MNO partnerships including AT&T and Verizon
- →value the direct-to-phone technology as genuinely differentiated from satellite systems requiring proprietary terminals
- →want exposure to space-based cellular coverage expansion addressing billions of under-connected smartphone users globally
- →are comfortable with pre-revenue scale risk, enormous capital requirements for full constellation, and SpaceX Starlink Direct-to-Cell competition
- →prefer Rocket Lab's diversified space business covering launch services (Electron), spacecraft components, and future Neutron vehicle
- →value Rocket Lab's proven commercial launch record as the world's second-most-launched orbital rocket after Falcon 9
- →want space infrastructure exposure from a company with current revenue from launches and space systems components unlike ASTS's pre-revenue stage
- →are comfortable with Neutron development capital requirements and competition from SpaceX in the medium launch market
| Metric | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 58.5 | 59.6 |
| AI rank | #190 | #170 |
| Latest close | $80.66 | $107.24 |
| 1M return | -8.44% | -15.76% |
| 6M return | +30.39% | +98.74% |
| 1Y return | +81.87% | +285.06% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $18.19K (+81.9%) started 2025-06-18 | $38.51K (+285.1%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $76.67K (+666.7%) started 2021-06-18 | $103.12K (+931.2%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $82.56K (+725.6%) started 2019-11-01 | $110.06K (+1000.6%) started 2020-11-24 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $31.31B | $67.01B |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/E | -393.08 | -6103.59 |
| Price/Sales | 368.59 | 98.60 |
| EV/Revenue | 295.70 | 87.28 |
| Analyst target | $81.47 | $106.92 |
| Target upside | +1.00% | -0.30% |
| Metric | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 1952.20% | 63.50% |
| Earnings growth | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growth | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margin | -1663.33% | -31.64% |
| Operating margin | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margin | 0.00% | -26.87% |
| ROIC proxy | -37.75% | -13.55% |
| Return on equity | -37.75% | -13.55% |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Beta | 2.63 | 2.50 |
| Debt/equity | 112.42 | 6.12 |
| Current ratio | 18.47 | 4.47 |
| Quick ratio | 17.91 | 3.87 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +81.87% | +285.06% |
| CAGR | +81.95% | +285.42% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.05 | 1.87 | |
| Max drawdown | 47.69% | 43.01% | |
| Max daily drop | 15.53% | 14.70% | |
| Max wkly drop | 25.44% | 23.65% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +666.73% | +931.15% |
| CAGR | +50.30% | +59.47% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.84 | 0.92 | |
| Max drawdown | 85.57% | 82.96% | |
| Max daily drop | 27.16% | 17.60% | |
| Max wkly drop | 33.07% | 26.89% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +725.59% | +1000.57% |
| CAGR | +37.50% | +53.90% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.74 | 0.87 | |
| Max drawdown | 91.07% | 82.96% | |
| Max daily drop | 27.16% | 17.60% | |
| Max wkly drop | 33.07% | 26.89% |
| Category | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| Company | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Rocket Lab USA, Inc. |
| Sector | Communication Services | Industrials |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | AST SpaceMobile is building a space-based cellular broadband network that connects directly to ordinary smartphones — no special hardware required. Its BlueBird satellites in low earth orbit (LEO) will provide broadband coverage to mobile network operators' existing subscriber bases. AT&T, Verizon, and Vodafone are commercial partners. AST SpaceMobile is pre-revenue at scale — its first commercial BlueBird satellites were launched in 2024 and initial commercial service began testing. | Rocket Lab operates Electron (small launch vehicle for 300kg payloads) and is developing Neutron (medium-heavy launch vehicle for 13,000+ kg payloads). Beyond launch services, Rocket Lab manufactures satellite components and provides spacecraft design and manufacturing services. Its space systems segment (solar panels, separation systems, reaction wheels) serves multiple satellite operators. Rocket Lab is the second most frequently launched orbital rocket in history after SpaceX's Falcon 9. |
| Investor focus | Investors track BlueBird satellite launch count and coverage area milestones, commercial service agreement execution with MNO partners, revenue from initial commercial service deployment, and the capital requirements for full constellation buildout. | Investors track Electron launch count per year and revenue, Neutron development progress and target launch date, space systems component revenue growth, and the overall path to profitability. |
- →Direct-to-smartphone satellite connectivity with no special handset hardware requirement is a genuinely differentiated technology vs competitors requiring proprietary terminals
- →AT&T, Verizon, and Vodafone commercial partnerships validate the MNO business model and provide a potential customer base of billions of existing subscribers
- →Targets unserved rural, maritime, and emergency cellular coverage gaps that are genuinely underserved by terrestrial networks
- →Second-most-frequently-launched orbital rocket behind SpaceX's Falcon 9 — reliable small satellite launch access is a proven commercial capability
- →Space systems component business (solar panels, reaction wheels, separation systems) provides manufacturing revenue independent of launch frequency
- →Neutron medium launch vehicle development positions Rocket Lab to compete in a larger launch market if Neutron achieves its performance targets
- →Pre-revenue at scale — requires successful commercial deployment of many more BlueBird satellites to generate material MNO revenue
- →Capital requirements for full constellation are enormous — equity dilution risk to fund satellite manufacturing and launches
- →SpaceX Starlink Direct-to-Cell competes with similar direct-to-phone satellite technology leveraging SpaceX's lower launch costs
- →Neutron medium launch vehicle requires billions in development capital and faces competition from SpaceX Falcon 9, ULA Vulcan, and others in the medium-launch market
- →Electron has only ~300kg capacity — the small satellite launch market is narrower than the larger medium/heavy launch market
- →Not yet profitable — losses are driven by Neutron development cost and are expected to continue through Neutron development completion
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.