ASTS vs RKLB Stock Comparison 2026: AST SpaceMobile vs Rocket Lab: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
AST SpaceMobile and Rocket Lab both operate in commercial space but in entirely different business segments. AST SpaceMobile is a telecommunications company whose space-based cellular network has started generating revenue (~$31.5M in Q2 2026, guiding to $150–200M for full-year 2026) ahead of a targeted consumer launch and a $1B 2027 run-rate goal. Rocket Lab is a launch vehicle and spacecraft component company with 50+ Electron launches, a $1.1B+ backlog, and a reusable Neutron rocket now targeting Q4 2026 pad delivery after a recent testing setback. Both remain pre-GAAP-profitability growth stories with significant capital requirements.
ASTS vs RKLB is space-based cellular broadband connecting existing smartphones directly, now converting nearly 60 MNO partnerships (including AT&T and Verizon) into early revenue (AST SpaceMobile) versus a proven small-launch operator scaling toward a reusable medium-lift rocket to unlock a much larger launch market (Rocket Lab) — both are speculative, capital-intensive space companies but in different sectors of the commercial space economy.
RKLB holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. ASTS has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+55.11% vs +43.55%), though RKLB has the better forward P/E setup (1384.99x vs -46.43x for ASTS). On fundamentals, ASTS is growing revenue faster (2626.60%), while RKLB maintains the higher operating margin (-24.57%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for RKLB (+75.91%) than for ASTS (+32.99%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- prefer a satellite broadband network targeting direct-to-smartphone connectivity, now backed by nearly 60 MNO partnerships (including definitive agreements with AT&T and Verizon) worth over $1.2 billion in contracted revenue
- value the direct-to-phone technology as genuinely differentiated from satellite systems requiring proprietary terminals, with the FCC having already cleared commercial service
- want exposure to a company that has begun generating revenue (~$31.5M in Q2 2026) and is guiding toward a $1 billion annualized run rate in 2027 as consumer service launches
- are comfortable with the fact that consumer commercial revenue hasn't started yet, ongoing capital/dilution needs for the full constellation, and SpaceX Starlink Direct-to-Cell competition
- prefer Rocket Lab's diversified space business covering launch services (Electron, 50+ successful flights), spacecraft components, and the upcoming Neutron vehicle
- value Rocket Lab's proven commercial launch record and $1.1B+ backlog as the world's second-most-launched orbital rocket after Falcon 9
- want space infrastructure exposure from a company with current, recurring revenue from launches and space systems components, rather than a company still ramping toward its first consumer revenue
- are comfortable with Neutron's recent testing setback and narrowing end-of-2026 launch window, plus continued net losses until Neutron reaches commercial cadence
| Metric | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 70.6 | 64.7 |
| AI ranki | #40 | #87 |
| Latest closei | $62.71 | $67.82 |
| 1M returni | -6.50% | -14.33% |
| 6M returni | -33.35% | -5.71% |
| 1Y returni | +55.11% | +43.55% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $15.22K (+52.2%) started 2025-09-17 | $14.11K (+41.1%) started 2025-09-17 |
| 5Y ago | $48.42K (+384.2%) started 2021-09-17 | $44.01K (+340.1%) started 2021-09-17 |
| 10Y ago | $64.19K (+541.9%) started 2019-11-01 | $69.6K (+596.0%) started 2020-11-24 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $23.3B | $40.35B |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | -46.43 | 1384.99 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 166.13 | 45.83 |
| Analyst targeti | $79.61 | $111.00 |
| Target upsidei | +32.99% | +75.91% |
| Metric | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 2626.60% | 62.00% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | -1560.79% | -32.76% |
| Operating margini | -544.63% | -24.57% |
| Profit margini | 0.00% | -21.51% |
| ROIC proxyi | -45.62% | -7.92% |
| Return on equityi | -45.62% | -7.92% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 2.73 | 2.63 |
| Debt/equityi | 124.86 | 3.83 |
| Current ratioi | 13.05 | 5.48 |
| Quick ratioi | 12.39 | 4.80 |
Over the past year, ASTS and RKLB have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.76), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +52.25% | +41.06% |
| CAGRi | +52.34% | +41.13% | |
| Volatilityi | 111.05% | 93.67% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.89 | 0.78 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.37 | 1.22 | |
| Max drawdowni | 60.15% | 60.99% | |
| Current drawdowni | 52.88% | 54.86% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 29.26% | 25.28% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 33.83% | 31.25% | |
| Max daily dropi | 17.04% | 14.70% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 25.54% | 25.27% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +384.25% | +340.10% |
| CAGRi | +37.10% | +34.50% | |
| Volatilityi | 109.66% | 78.97% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.76 | 0.71 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.31 | 1.12 | |
| Max drawdowni | 85.57% | 78.32% | |
| Current drawdowni | 52.88% | 54.86% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 42.16% | 46.32% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 47.71% | 53.32% | |
| Max daily dropi | 27.16% | 17.11% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 33.07% | 26.89% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +541.86% | +596.02% |
| CAGRi | +31.04% | +39.63% | |
| Volatilityi | 100.53% | 78.68% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.69 | 0.75 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.21 | 1.23 | |
| Max drawdowni | 91.07% | 82.96% | |
| Current drawdowni | 52.88% | 54.86% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 43.56% | 46.66% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 52.45% | 54.93% | |
| Max daily dropi | 27.16% | 17.60% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 33.07% | 26.89% |
| Category | ASTS | RKLB |
|---|---|---|
| Company | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Rocket Lab USA, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Industrials |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Aerospace & Defense |
| Core business | AST SpaceMobile is building a space-based cellular broadband network that connects directly to ordinary smartphones — no special hardware required. Its BlueBird satellites in low earth orbit (LEO) provide broadband coverage to mobile network operators' existing subscriber bases. Nearly 60 global MNOs — including AT&T and Verizon, which signed definitive multi-year commercial agreements — have collectively committed more than $1.2 billion in contracted revenue. Commercial revenue has begun ahead of full network buildout: AST SpaceMobile reported Q2 2026 revenue of roughly $31.5 million (up from about $15 million in Q1, mostly U.S. government contracts) and guided to $150–$200 million for full-year 2026, with beta consumer trials targeted for later in 2026 as the constellation scales toward roughly 45 satellites in orbit. | Rocket Lab operates Electron (small launch vehicle for ~300kg payloads, with 50+ successful launches making it the second most frequently launched orbital rocket in history after SpaceX's Falcon 9) and is developing Neutron, a reusable medium-lift launch vehicle targeting 13,000+ kg payloads — roughly a 43x payload increase over Electron. Beyond launch services, Rocket Lab manufactures satellite components and provides spacecraft design and manufacturing services; its space systems segment (solar panels, separation systems, reaction wheels) serves multiple satellite operators and carries a backlog north of $1.1 billion. |
| Investor focus | Investors track BlueBird satellite launch count and in-orbit constellation size, FCC and regulatory clearances for commercial service, MNO commercial revenue ramp (government contracts today, consumer service ahead), and the capital requirements for the full constellation buildout. | Investors track Electron launch cadence and revenue, Neutron's path to first flight (stage-1 tank production is tracking toward pad delivery in Q4 2026, though the company has flagged that an end-of-year first launch is no longer assured after a stage-1 tank test setback), space systems component revenue growth, and the overall path to profitability. |
- Direct-to-smartphone satellite connectivity with no special handset hardware requirement is a genuinely differentiated technology vs competitors requiring proprietary terminals
- Nearly 60 global MNOs — including definitive commercial agreements with AT&T and Verizon — have committed over $1.2 billion in contracted revenue, and the FCC has cleared commercial service
- Revenue has already begun ramping (Q2 2026 revenue ~$31.5M, more than doubling quarter-over-quarter) with management guiding toward a $1 billion annualized run rate in 2027 as consumer service launches
- Proven commercial launch operator — 50+ successful Electron launches and the second-most-frequently-launched orbital rocket behind Falcon 9 — with reliable small satellite launch access already generating recurring revenue
- Space systems component business (solar panels, reaction wheels, separation systems) provides manufacturing revenue independent of launch frequency, backed by a $1.1B+ backlog including multi-launch deals
- Neutron reusable medium-lift vehicle would open a materially larger addressable launch market if it hits its performance and cost targets
- Consumer commercial service revenue has not yet begun — 2026 revenue is still mostly government contracts and gateway sales, so the $1B 2027 target hinges entirely on successful beta-to-commercial conversion
- Capital requirements for the full constellation remain large — continued equity issuance is a dilution risk to fund satellite manufacturing and launches
- SpaceX Starlink Direct-to-Cell (via T-Mobile) competes with similar direct-to-phone satellite technology leveraging SpaceX's lower launch costs
- Neutron has slipped: a stage-1 tank ruptured during hydrostatic pressure testing, and while stage-1 production still tracks toward Q4 2026 pad delivery, Rocket Lab has stopped short of reaffirming first flight before year-end
- Neutron requires billions in development capital and faces competition from SpaceX Falcon 9, ULA Vulcan, and Blue Origin New Glenn in the medium-launch market
- Not yet profitable — losses are driven by Neutron development cost and are expected to continue until Neutron reaches commercial cadence
ASTS vs RKLB: Which Space Stock Is Better Right Now?
As of mid-2026, AST SpaceMobile has crossed from pre-revenue promise into early commercial execution: Q2 2026 revenue of roughly $31.5 million more than doubled quarter-over-quarter, nearly 60 MNOs have committed over $1.2 billion in contracted revenue, and the FCC has cleared commercial service. But the bulk of that revenue is still government contracts and gateway sales — the $1 billion 2027 run-rate target depends entirely on beta trials converting into paying AT&T and Verizon subscribers later this year.
Rocket Lab is the more operationally proven of the two: 50+ successful Electron launches, a $1.1 billion-plus backlog, and a space systems components business that generates revenue independent of launch cadence. Its next catalyst, Neutron, is tracking toward Q4 2026 pad delivery, but a stage-1 tank test rupture means the company is no longer committing to a first launch before year-end — a reminder that hardware timelines in this sector slip.
Both remain capital-intensive, pre-GAAP-profitability space bets. ASTS offers a larger binary payoff if direct-to-smartphone service scales globally; RKLB offers a more diversified, already-revenue-generating base with Neutron as the next leg of growth rather than the entire investment case.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.