ETN vs PWR Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
ETN and PWR both profit from electrification but capture it as different kinds of business. Eaton manufactures and sells electrical products with manufacturer margins and diversified end markets including aerospace. Quanta sells engineering and construction labour to build the grid, with a more concentrated utility customer base and thinner margins. Eaton is the diversified, higher-margin compounder; Quanta is the purer, more levered read on grid capital spending.
Use this ETN vs PWR comparison to weigh diversification against directness. Eaton's breadth means grid investment is one of several growth drivers, which smooths results but dilutes the theme. Quanta is almost a pure expression of utility transmission and distribution spending, which is more potent if that spending keeps rising and more exposed if it pauses.
PWR holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. PWR has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+61.13% vs +18.21%), though ETN has the better forward P/E setup (25.07x vs 30.69x for PWR). On fundamentals, PWR is growing revenue faster (41.10%), while ETN maintains the higher operating margin (16.56%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for PWR (+27.77%) than for ETN (+18.07%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want diversified electrification exposure with manufacturer-level margins
- Value a broad product portfolio and installed base over single-theme purity
- Like the aerospace aftermarket as a second, independent earnings driver
- Prefer a lower-volatility industrial compounder
- Want the most direct exposure to grid construction spending
- See craft labour scarcity as a durable competitive advantage
- Accept thinner margins in exchange for a cleaner thematic read
- Are comfortable with project execution risk and utility budget dependence
| Metric | ETN | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 62.2 | 80.9 |
| AI ranki | #111 | #11 |
| Latest closei | $439.98 | $649.13 |
| 1M returni | +4.90% | +5.25% |
| 6M returni | +23.12% | +18.03% |
| 1Y returni | +18.21% | +61.13% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | ETN | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.06K (+20.6%) started 2025-09-25 | $16.21K (+62.1%) started 2025-09-25 |
| 5Y ago | $32.26K (+222.6%) started 2021-09-27 | $56.23K (+462.3%) started 2021-09-27 |
| 10Y ago | $105.2K (+952.0%) started 2016-09-26 | $254.72K (+2447.2%) started 2016-09-26 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | ETN | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $156.44B | $90.61B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 40.97 | 68.96 |
| Forward P/Ei | 25.07 | 30.69 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 2.15 |
| EV/Revenuei | 5.90 | 2.94 |
| Analyst targeti | $475.57 | $770.04 |
| Target upsidei | +18.07% | +27.77% |
| Metric | ETN | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 21.40% | 41.10% |
| Earnings growthi | -15.90% | 94.70% |
| EPS growthi | -15.90% | +94.70% |
| FCF margini | +10.34% | +5.94% |
| Operating margini | 16.56% | 7.22% |
| Profit margini | 12.75% | 4.03% |
| ROIC proxyi | 19.68% | 15.34% |
| Return on equityi | 19.68% | 15.34% |
| Dividend yieldi | 1.09% | 0.07% |
| Payout ratioi | 43.58% | 4.92% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | No increase yet |
| Betai | 1.18 | 1.22 |
| Debt/equityi | 105.06 | 67.78 |
| Current ratioi | 1.24 | 1.10 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.70 | 0.98 |
Over the past year, ETN and PWR have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.70), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | ETN | PWR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +20.63% | +62.12% |
| CAGRi | +20.66% | +62.23% | |
| Volatilityi | 39.19% | 44.22% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.56 | 1.21 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.79 | 1.98 | |
| Max drawdowni | 18.55% | 28.54% | |
| Current drawdowni | 4.34% | 17.33% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 7.34% | 6.94% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 8.97% | 10.03% | |
| Max daily dropi | 7.57% | 6.17% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 11.07% | 14.61% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +202.19% | +458.45% |
| CAGRi | +24.78% | +41.11% | |
| Volatilityi | 31.94% | 36.94% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.72 | 1.00 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.01 | 1.51 | |
| Max drawdowni | 34.46% | 33.89% | |
| Current drawdowni | 4.34% | 17.33% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 8.38% | 6.76% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 11.06% | 9.86% | |
| Max daily dropi | 15.56% | 18.32% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 14.45% | 17.88% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +749.32% | +2400.07% |
| CAGRi | +23.86% | +37.99% | |
| Volatilityi | 30.84% | 34.49% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.70 | 0.98 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.02 | 1.48 | |
| Max drawdowni | 44.55% | 45.53% | |
| Current drawdowni | 4.34% | 17.33% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 7.44% | 7.66% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 10.25% | 10.54% | |
| Max daily dropi | 15.56% | 18.32% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 24.11% | 24.31% |
| Category | ETN | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Eaton Corporation plc | Quanta Services, Inc. |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Specialty Industrial Machinery | Engineering & Construction |
| Core business | Diversified power management company selling electrical components and systems — switchgear, circuit protection, power distribution and controls — into data centres, utilities, commercial buildings, and industrial customers, alongside an aerospace and vehicle segment. | Specialty contractor building and maintaining electric transmission and distribution systems, substations, and renewable generation, plus pipeline and communications infrastructure. Revenue is driven by skilled labour deployment and project execution. |
| Investor focus | Electrical segment organic growth and backlog, data centre order strength, price versus cost, and aerospace aftermarket demand. | Backlog, craft labour availability, project margins, and utility capital expenditure budgets. |
- Broad electrical product portfolio benefits from electrification across data centres, utilities, and buildings
- Strong installed base and specification position create repeat and replacement demand
- Diversified end markets reduce dependence on any single customer or vertical
- Highly direct exposure to utility grid investment, which is being driven up by load growth and asset replacement
- Skilled craft workforce is difficult to replicate and cannot be offshored
- Master service agreements and large backlog support multi-year revenue visibility
- Commercial construction exposure is sensitive to interest rates and building activity
- Data centre demand has become a large growth driver, raising the stakes if it decelerates
- Long-cycle project pricing can lag input cost inflation
- Contractor margins are structurally thinner than product margins
- Fixed-price contracts expose the company to cost, weather, and productivity risk
- Dependent on utility capital plans clearing regulatory approval
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on ETN and PWR. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside ETN and PWR, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.