CPRI vs RL Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Capri Holdings and Ralph Lauren both operate globally recognized fashion brand portfolios, but Capri Holdings spans a range of luxury and accessible luxury brands including Versace, Jimmy Choo, and Michael Kors, while Ralph Lauren operates a more unified lifestyle brand built around decades of consistent positioning across apparel, accessories, and home products.
Capri Holdings offers diversified exposure across true luxury and accessible luxury price points through multiple distinct brands, while Ralph Lauren offers concentrated exposure to a single, unified, premium lifestyle brand with a long track record of disciplined brand elevation. Consider whether you prefer Capri's multi-brand luxury diversification or Ralph Lauren's unified brand consistency.
RL holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. RL has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+8.81% vs -31.48%), though CPRI has the better forward P/E setup (5.10x vs 16.93x for RL). RL leads on both revenue growth (14.00%) and operating margin (18.39%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for CPRI (+74.73%) than for RL (+26.17%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want diversified exposure across true luxury (Versace, Jimmy Choo) and accessible luxury (Michael Kors) fashion brands
- Believe Versace and Jimmy Choo's growth trajectory can offset any softness in the Michael Kors brand
- Are comfortable with the execution complexity of managing multiple distinct luxury brands under one holding company
- Value Capri's international distribution network across global luxury fashion markets
- Want concentrated exposure to a single, unified, globally recognized premium lifestyle apparel brand
- Value Ralph Lauren's long track record of disciplined brand elevation and pricing power
- Believe continued direct-to-consumer and Asian market expansion will support sustained brand growth
- Prefer a unified brand strategy over a multi-brand luxury holding company structure
| Metric | CPRI | RL |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 24.9 | 53.4 |
| AI ranki | #3031 | #342 |
| Latest closei | $14.95 | $333.08 |
| 1M returni | +3.68% | -11.94% |
| 6M returni | -19.36% | -2.10% |
| 1Y returni | -31.48% | +8.81% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | CPRI | RL |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $6.85K (-31.5%) started 2025-09-17 | $10.61K (+6.1%) started 2025-09-18 |
| 5Y ago | $2.84K (-71.6%) started 2021-09-17 | $35.8K (+258.0%) started 2021-09-20 |
| 10Y ago | $3.01K (-69.9%) started 2016-09-19 | $48.58K (+385.8%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | CPRI | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $1.48B | $21.09B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 16.53 | 22.17 |
| Forward P/Ei | 5.10 | 16.93 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 0.79 | 2.65 |
| Analyst targeti | $22.53 | $446.71 |
| Target upsidei | +74.73% | +26.17% |
| Metric | CPRI | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | -3.50% | 14.00% |
| Earnings growthi | 34.40% | 21.60% |
| EPS growthi | +34.40% | +21.60% |
| FCF margini | +5.59% | +10.53% |
| Operating margini | 2.60% | 18.39% |
| Profit margini | 4.44% | 11.76% |
| ROIC proxyi | 144.62% | 37.54% |
| Return on equityi | 144.62% | 37.54% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 1.13% |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 23.55% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | No increase yet |
| Betai | 1.41 | 1.37 |
| Debt/equityi | 973.43 | 110.37 |
| Current ratioi | 1.19 | 2.04 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.39 | 1.32 |
Over the past year, CPRI and RL have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.57), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | CPRI | RL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -31.48% | +6.08% |
| CAGRi | -31.50% | +6.09% | |
| Volatilityi | 45.69% | 34.78% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.70 | 0.21 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.95 | 0.33 | |
| Max drawdowni | 54.05% | 19.59% | |
| Current drawdowni | 45.95% | 19.59% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 24.39% | 5.70% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 29.10% | 7.64% | |
| Max daily dropi | 13.22% | 5.19% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 15.95% | 10.89% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -71.60% | +227.07% |
| CAGRi | -22.26% | +26.78% | |
| Volatilityi | 59.39% | 37.00% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.20 | 0.71 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.28 | 1.05 | |
| Max drawdowni | 82.36% | 36.51% | |
| Current drawdowni | 78.87% | 19.59% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 46.78% | 9.86% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 52.13% | 13.35% | |
| Max daily dropi | 48.89% | 16.27% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 53.46% | 22.86% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -69.87% | +299.25% |
| CAGRi | -11.31% | +14.85% | |
| Volatilityi | 58.82% | 38.65% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.02 | 0.44 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.02 | 0.64 | |
| Max drawdowni | 90.03% | 55.14% | |
| Current drawdowni | 80.18% | 19.59% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 43.06% | 16.10% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 49.33% | 20.67% | |
| Max daily dropi | 48.89% | 16.27% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 60.95% | 26.36% |
| Category | CPRI | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Capri Holdings Limited | Ralph Lauren Corporation |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Apparel Manufacturing |
| Core business | A global fashion holding company owning luxury and accessible luxury brands including Versace, Jimmy Choo, and Michael Kors, designing and marketing apparel, accessories, and footwear through wholesale, direct-to-consumer, and international channels. | A global lifestyle apparel company designing and marketing apparel, accessories, and home products under the Ralph Lauren, Polo, and related brand names, sold through wholesale, direct-to-consumer, and international channels. |
| Investor focus | Versace and Jimmy Choo luxury brand growth trajectory, Michael Kors brand revenue stabilization, and overall portfolio margin trends amid brand repositioning efforts. | Direct-to-consumer sales channel growth, international expansion particularly in Asia, and brand elevation strategy supporting premium pricing. |
- Diversified brand portfolio spans true luxury (Versace, Jimmy Choo) and accessible luxury (Michael Kors) price points
- Versace and Jimmy Choo provide exposure to higher-margin, higher-growth true luxury fashion categories
- International distribution network provides access to luxury demand across multiple global regions
- Iconic, globally recognized Ralph Lauren and Polo brand identity built over decades of consistent brand positioning
- Brand elevation strategy has supported improved pricing power and reduced promotional discounting over time
- Diversified product categories spanning apparel, accessories, and home goods under a unified brand umbrella
- Michael Kors brand has faced periods of revenue softness requiring ongoing repositioning and turnaround effort
- Luxury fashion brands can be sensitive to shifts in high-end consumer discretionary spending
- Integrating and growing multiple distinct luxury brands under one holding structure carries execution complexity
- Brand relies on maintaining premium positioning, which requires disciplined management of distribution and promotional activity
- Faces competition from both luxury fashion houses and accessible lifestyle apparel brands across its markets
- International revenue exposure introduces currency translation effects and regional consumer demand sensitivity
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.