PVH vs RL Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
PVH Corp (PVH) and Ralph Lauren (RL) are both major global fashion apparel companies — PVH with Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger at the premium accessible fashion tier with heavy European exposure, versus Ralph Lauren's iconic American luxury lifestyle positioning with strong direct-to-consumer execution and AUR growth. Ralph Lauren trades at a premium to PVH reflecting its stronger luxury positioning.
PVH vs RL is accessible premium fashion (Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger) versus American luxury lifestyle (Ralph Lauren) — both global multi-brand fashion companies but at different points on the price-value spectrum with different geographic exposures and margin profiles.
RL holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. RL has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+55.60% vs +18.84%), though PVH trades at the lower forward P/E (6.43x vs 19.82x). RL leads on both revenue growth (16.60%) and operating margin (13.37%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for PVH (+13.37%) than for RL (+5.95%).
- →Want global premium fashion exposure through Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands with significant European market concentration
- →Value PVH's DTC transformation and brand elevation strategy as a long-term margin improvement driver
- →See PVH's discount to Ralph Lauren as a valuation opportunity if brand elevation and DTC penetration deliver improving margins
- →Want a higher-quality luxury American lifestyle brand with proven AUR growth, strong DTC penetration, and superior margin profile versus accessible fashion peers
- →Value Ralph Lauren's brand equity as a durable competitive moat that commands pricing power through economic cycles
- →See Asia expansion (particularly China affluent consumer growth) as a meaningful incremental revenue opportunity for an aspirational U.S. luxury brand
| Metric | PVH | RL |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 25.4 | 54.4 |
| AI rank | #2782 | #281 |
| Latest close | $77.07 | $413.01 |
| 1M return | -2.96% | +28.79% |
| 6M return | +7.46% | +12.93% |
| 1Y return | +18.84% | +55.60% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | PVH | RL |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $11.88K (+18.8%) started 2025-06-18 | $15.42K (+54.2%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $7.58K (-24.2%) started 2021-06-18 | $43.22K (+332.2%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $7.67K (-23.3%) started 2016-06-20 | $63.37K (+533.7%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | PVH | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.78B | $24.04B |
| Trailing P/E | 24.84 | 26.74 |
| Forward P/E | 6.43 | 19.82 |
| Price/Sales | 0.36 | N/A |
| EV/Revenue | 0.82 | 3.08 |
| Analyst target | $92.92 | $428.00 |
| Target upside | +13.37% | +5.95% |
| Metric | PVH | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 2.10% | 16.60% |
| Earnings growth | -96.20% | 20.00% |
| EPS growth | -96.20% | +20.00% |
| FCF margin | +5.18% | +8.09% |
| Operating margin | 5.82% | 13.37% |
| Profit margin | 1.76% | 11.60% |
| ROIC proxy | 3.32% | 34.66% |
| Return on equity | 3.32% | 34.66% |
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 0.93% |
| Beta | 1.72 | 1.37 |
| Debt/equity | 86.34 | 105.91 |
| Current ratio | 1.68 | 2.13 |
| Quick ratio | 0.75 | 1.50 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | PVH | RL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +18.84% | +54.22% |
| CAGR | +18.86% | +54.31% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.52 | 1.31 | |
| Max drawdown | 32.00% | 17.67% | |
| Max daily drop | 20.24% | 6.48% | |
| Max wkly drop | 20.08% | 10.89% | |
| 5Y | Growth | -24.23% | +292.42% |
| CAGR | -5.40% | +31.50% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.03 | 0.81 | |
| Max drawdown | 63.65% | 36.51% | |
| Max daily drop | 22.22% | 16.27% | |
| Max wkly drop | 31.57% | 22.86% | |
| 10Y | Growth | -23.27% | +417.30% |
| CAGR | -2.62% | +17.87% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.10 | 0.50 | |
| Max drawdown | 82.72% | 55.14% | |
| Max daily drop | 22.22% | 16.27% | |
| Max wkly drop | 41.29% | 26.36% |
| Category | PVH | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Company | PVH Corp. | Ralph Lauren Corporation |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Apparel Manufacturing | N/A |
| Core business | PVH Corp is a global apparel and lifestyle company operating the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands across apparel, jeanswear, footwear, and accessories in approximately 40 countries, generating significant revenue in Europe through its wholesale and direct-to-consumer channels. | Ralph Lauren is an iconic American luxury lifestyle brand company operating Ralph Lauren, Polo Ralph Lauren, Club Monaco, and other brands across apparel, home, fragrances, and accessories — positioned at the higher end of the luxury spectrum versus accessible fashion brands. |
| Investor focus | Investors track PVH's brand revenue trends (Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger separately), direct-to-consumer penetration versus wholesale, European market performance, DTC margin improvement, and the pace of brand elevation toward higher average selling prices. | Investors track Ralph Lauren's revenue growth by region (Americas, Europe, Asia), direct-to-consumer penetration (now the majority of revenue), AUR (average unit retail) expansion, operating margin improvement, and the brand's ability to attract younger consumers while maintaining luxury positioning. |
- →Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger are globally recognized premium fashion brands with strong brand equity across apparel, accessories, and fragrance licensing
- →Europe is PVH's largest market — European consumers have strong brand affinity for both Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, providing geographic diversification from the U.S.
- →DTC (Direct-to-Consumer) channel shift improves margins and provides better brand control versus wholesale distribution through department stores
- →Ralph Lauren is one of the most aspirational American luxury lifestyle brands globally — strong brand equity spans multiple product categories and generations
- →Successful brand elevation has driven significant AUR (average unit retail) growth and DTC penetration, improving margins while reducing markdown risk
- →China and Asia growth represent meaningful expansion opportunities as affluent Asian consumers embrace aspirational American luxury brands
- →European economic weakness from inflation, energy cost pressures, and consumer confidence declines can significantly impact PVH's largest revenue market
- →Department store channel weakness in the U.S. affects PVH's wholesale business as a historical primary distribution channel
- →Brand elevation strategy (moving Calvin Klein upmarket) requires investment and carries execution risk — repositioning luxury perception takes years
- →Ralph Lauren's luxury positioning makes it sensitive to economic downturns — luxury consumer spending can decline rapidly when consumer confidence falls
- →Younger consumer acquisition requires maintaining brand freshness and cultural relevance while preserving the heritage premium that attracts core customers
- →China exposure creates geopolitical risk — U.S.-China trade tensions or Chinese consumer nationalism could affect Ralph Lauren's Asia business
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.