LULU vs NKE Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Lululemon and Nike are both athleisure brands but at very different scales and price points. Lululemon is a premium niche DTC brand with exceptional margins. Nike is the mass-market global athletic leader. Lululemon's premium positioning and DTC model create superior gross margins; Nike's global scale and athlete endorsements create cultural reach Lululemon cannot match. Lululemon is the premium segment challenger; Nike is the incumbent market leader.
LULU vs NKE is the premium athleisure DTC brand with 55%+ gross margins, community-based brand loyalty, and near-total direct consumer relationship (Lululemon) versus the world's largest athletic company with global scale, Jordan cultural permanence, and mass-market reach in every segment including premium women's activewear (Nike) — premium niche DTC margin quality vs global scale athletic market leadership.
LULU holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. LULU leads on both 1-year return (-42.24%) and forward P/E quality (10.76x vs 17.28x for NKE), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, LULU is growing revenue faster (4.30%), while NKE maintains the higher operating margin (12.69%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for NKE (+27.57%) than for LULU (+5.60%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- prefer the premium DTC athleisure brand with 55%+ gross margins from premium pricing that mass athletic brands structurally cannot replicate
- value Lululemon's brand community and store ambassador model creating belonging-based loyalty that reduces price sensitivity
- want premium activewear recovery exposure as post-pandemic growth normalization creates potentially attractive entry into a durable premium brand
- are comfortable with North America comp growth deceleration, premium women's activewear competition from ALO and Vuori, and China expansion execution uncertainty
- prefer the global athletic market leader with Jordan Brand cultural permanence, DTC margin expansion, and global manufacturing and distribution scale
- value Nike's breadth across all athletic categories vs Lululemon's concentration in premium women's athleisure — Nike serves every segment simultaneously
- want global athletic brand recovery from DTC transition and China headwinds at a potentially attractive premium brand valuation
- are comfortable with premium women's activewear market share challenge from Lululemon in the specific segment Nike hasn't dominated, and DTC channel conflict normalization timeline
| Metric | LULU | NKE |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 37.2 | 27.5 |
| AI ranki | #1519 | #2435 |
| Latest closei | $98.06 | $35.51 |
| 1M returni | -17.91% | -13.50% |
| 6M returni | -40.77% | -33.55% |
| 1Y returni | -42.24% | -50.75% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | LULU | NKE |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $5.78K (-42.2%) started 2025-09-18 | $4.93K (-50.7%) started 2025-09-18 |
| 5Y ago | $2.34K (-76.6%) started 2021-09-20 | $2.53K (-74.7%) started 2021-09-20 |
| 10Y ago | $14.9K (+49.0%) started 2016-09-19 | $7.95K (-20.5%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | LULU | NKE |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $13.69B | $58.75B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 9.76 | 18.86 |
| Forward P/Ei | 10.76 | 17.28 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 1.94 |
| EV/Revenuei | 1.25 | 1.31 |
| Analyst targeti | $127.35 | $50.52 |
| Target upsidei | +5.60% | +27.57% |
| Metric | LULU | NKE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 4.30% | -1.10% |
| Earnings growthi | -35.00% | 428.00% |
| EPS growthi | -35.00% | +428.00% |
| FCF margini | +10.12% | +4.07% |
| Operating margini | 11.21% | 12.69% |
| Profit margini | 13.03% | 6.70% |
| ROIC proxyi | 32.03% | 22.14% |
| Return on equityi | 32.03% | 22.14% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 4.27% |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 77.62% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | No increase yet |
| Betai | 0.86 | 1.12 |
| Debt/equityi | 44.26 | 74.29 |
| Current ratioi | 2.23 | 1.96 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.94 | 1.19 |
Over the past year, LULU and NKE have moved weakly in the same direction (correlation of 0.40), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | LULU | NKE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -42.24% | -50.75% |
| CAGRi | -42.26% | -50.77% | |
| Volatilityi | 44.99% | 36.29% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -1.09 | -1.89 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -1.37 | -2.35 | |
| Max drawdowni | 55.54% | 52.38% | |
| Current drawdowni | 54.58% | 52.38% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 24.81% | 27.97% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 30.84% | 31.86% | |
| Max daily dropi | 17.38% | 15.51% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 19.31% | 18.35% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -76.63% | -75.86% |
| CAGRi | -25.25% | -24.77% | |
| Volatilityi | 43.30% | 35.79% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.56 | -0.74 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.73 | -0.99 | |
| Max drawdowni | 81.23% | 79.02% | |
| Current drawdowni | 80.82% | 79.02% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 38.13% | 45.96% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 43.49% | 49.38% | |
| Max daily dropi | 19.80% | 19.98% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 25.32% | 22.44% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +49.00% | -28.50% |
| CAGRi | +4.07% | -3.30% | |
| Volatilityi | 41.21% | 32.55% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.20 | -0.08 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.27 | -0.11 | |
| Max drawdowni | 81.23% | 79.02% | |
| Current drawdowni | 80.82% | 79.02% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 23.63% | 25.74% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 32.00% | 35.31% | |
| Max daily dropi | 23.44% | 19.98% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 30.43% | 22.44% |
| Category | LULU | NKE |
|---|---|---|
| Company | lululemon athletica inc. | Nike, Inc. |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Apparel Retail | Footwear & Accessories |
| Core business | Lululemon is the leading premium athleisure brand known for yoga and training apparel primarily targeting affluent women, with growing men's and international markets. Lululemon's premium positioning ($100+ leggings, $70+ sports bras) creates exceptional gross margins (55%+) versus mass athletic brands. Lululemon is almost entirely direct-to-consumer — selling through its own stores and lululemon.com with minimal wholesale. The company has expanded into footwear, outerwear, and accessories while attempting to internationalize particularly in China. | Nike is the world's largest athletic company with a mass-market athletic brand serving every price point across footwear, apparel, and equipment. Nike competes in athletic performance (Jordan, Nike Basketball, Nike Running) and lifestyle (Sportswear, Jordan Lifestyle). Nike's scale enables global marketing, manufacturing, and distribution capabilities Lululemon cannot match. Nike Women has specifically targeted Lululemon's premium women's market with its own premium activewear lines. |
| Investor focus | Investors track comparable sales growth, gross margin sustainability, men's category penetration, China international expansion, and footwear category build-out. | Investors track Nike Direct revenue, China recovery, gross margin, and franchise freshness across key silhouettes. |
- Premium pricing power: Lululemon customers pay 3–4x more per item than Nike mass athletic — creating 55%+ gross margins that mass athletic brands cannot match
- Almost fully DTC (direct-to-consumer): Lululemon owns the customer relationship and captures full retail margins without wholesale partner margin sharing
- Brand community and store experience differentiation — Lululemon stores serve as community hubs with ambassador athletes and in-store classes creating belonging-based loyalty
- Global scale unmatched by premium niche competitors — Nike's manufacturing, marketing, and distribution reach makes it the only athletic brand truly capable of serving all global markets and price points simultaneously
- Nike Women actively competing in Lululemon's premium territory — Nike's NikeCourt, Nike Yoga, and premium activewear lines target the exact consumer Lululemon serves
- Jordan Brand and athlete endorsements create cultural relevance driving footwear ASP above commodity athletic brands
- Growth deceleration: Lululemon's North America comp growth slowed significantly as post-pandemic athleisure normalization reduces the pandemic-era demand spike
- Competition from Nike Women, ALO Yoga, and Vuori in premium women's activewear — the market Lululemon pioneered is now intensely competitive
- China execution: Lululemon bet significant strategy on China international expansion that faces macro headwinds and local luxury athletic competition
- Lululemon-specific weakness: premium women's athleisure is Lululemon's fortress where Nike has not successfully displaced it despite significant investment
- DTC transition and China recovery are the primary near-term challenges — not premium athleisure competition with Lululemon
- Premium activewear is a small segment of Nike's total business — Nike's mass market scale creates different priorities vs Lululemon's premium focus
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.