TPR vs PVH Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Tapestry and PVH Corp both operate portfolios of well-known fashion brands, but Tapestry is focused on accessible luxury handbags and accessories through Coach and Kate Spade, while PVH Corp operates a broader lifestyle apparel brand portfolio through Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger spanning a wider range of product categories and global markets.
Tapestry offers concentrated exposure to the accessible luxury handbag and accessories category anchored by Coach's pricing power, while PVH Corp offers diversified exposure across broader lifestyle apparel categories through its Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands. Consider whether you prefer Tapestry's accessible luxury focus or PVH's broader lifestyle apparel diversification.
TPR holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. PVH leads on both 1-year return (+5.22%) and forward P/E quality (6.01x vs 14.15x for TPR), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. TPR leads on both revenue growth (8.90%) and operating margin (19.82%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for TPR (+33.40%) than for PVH (+21.17%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want concentrated exposure to the accessible luxury handbag and accessories category through Coach and Kate Spade
- Believe Coach's demonstrated pricing power and brand momentum can continue driving consistent performance
- Value Tapestry's growing direct-to-consumer and international sales channel mix
- Are comfortable with the ongoing turnaround effort required for the Kate Spade brand
- Want diversified exposure across broader lifestyle apparel categories through Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger
- Value the global brand recognition and international distribution reach of PVH's brand portfolio
- Believe margin recovery efforts through promotional and inventory management can improve profitability over time
- Prefer a licensing-supplemented apparel business model over a pure accessories and handbag focus
| Metric | TPR | PVH |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 53.4 | 25.5 |
| AI ranki | #315 | #2860 |
| Latest closei | $117.84 | $88.27 |
| 1M returni | +3.26% | +16.54% |
| 3M returni | -22.77% | +1.45% |
| 6M returni | -18.75% | -3.47% |
| 1Y returni | +4.18% | +5.22% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | TPR | PVH |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $10.44K (+4.4%) started 2025-10-29 | $10.96K (+9.6%) started 2025-10-29 |
| 5Y ago | $37.19K (+271.9%) started 2021-11-01 | $8.07K (-19.3%) started 2021-10-29 |
| 10Y ago | $55.59K (+455.9%) started 2016-10-31 | $8.25K (-17.5%) started 2016-10-31 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | TPR | PVH |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $25.02B | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 17.26 | 22.97 |
| Forward P/Ei | 14.15 | 6.01 |
| Price/Salesi | 2.38 | 0.36 |
| EV/Revenuei | 3.48 | 0.79 |
| Analyst targeti | $167.40 | $91.83 |
| Target upsidei | +33.40% | +21.17% |
| Metric | TPR | PVH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 8.90% | 2.10% |
| Earnings growthi | 73.70% | -96.20% |
| EPS growthi | +73.70% | -96.20% |
| FCF margini | +17.49% | +5.18% |
| Operating margini | 19.82% | 5.82% |
| Profit margini | 19.09% | 1.76% |
| ROIC proxyi | 197.13% | 3.32% |
| Return on equityi | 197.13% | 3.32% |
| Dividend yieldi | 1.47% | 0.20% |
| Payout ratioi | 21.37% | 4.39% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | N/A |
| Betai | 1.46 | 1.75 |
| Debt/equityi | 571.61 | 86.34 |
| Current ratioi | 1.75 | 1.68 |
| Quick ratioi | 1.01 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, TPR and PVH have moved weakly in the same direction (correlation of 0.36), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | TPR | PVH |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +4.36% | +9.61% |
| CAGRi | +4.36% | +9.63% | |
| Volatilityi | 41.16% | 46.65% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.21 | 0.34 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.27 | 0.46 | |
| Max drawdowni | 33.02% | 30.66% | |
| Current drawdowni | 28.49% | 10.67% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 11.43% | 17.31% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 15.13% | 19.35% | |
| Max daily dropi | 16.49% | 20.24% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.70% | 20.08% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +232.69% | -19.26% |
| CAGRi | +27.22% | -4.19% | |
| Volatilityi | 40.83% | 47.31% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.69 | 0.05 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.00 | 0.07 | |
| Max drawdowni | 41.87% | 63.65% | |
| Current drawdowni | 28.49% | 37.22% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 13.90% | 35.63% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 17.54% | 38.48% | |
| Max daily dropi | 16.49% | 22.22% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.70% | 31.57% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +320.73% | -17.49% |
| CAGRi | +15.46% | -1.91% | |
| Volatilityi | 44.74% | 49.31% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.45 | 0.12 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.63 | 0.17 | |
| Max drawdowni | 78.87% | 82.72% | |
| Current drawdowni | 28.49% | 47.51% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 21.93% | 40.23% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 29.15% | 44.93% | |
| Max daily dropi | 29.27% | 22.22% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 37.71% | 41.29% |
| Category | TPR | PVH |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Tapestry, Inc. | PVH Corp. |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Apparel Manufacturing |
| Core business | A house of accessible luxury and fashion brands including Coach and Kate Spade, designing and marketing handbags, accessories, and apparel through wholesale, direct-to-consumer, and international distribution channels. | A global apparel company owning and marketing lifestyle brands including Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, designing and distributing apparel and accessories through wholesale, direct-to-consumer, and licensing arrangements worldwide. |
| Investor focus | Coach brand momentum and pricing power, Kate Spade brand turnaround progress, and direct-to-consumer and international sales channel growth. | Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brand revenue trends, direct-to-consumer channel growth, and international market performance, particularly in Europe and Asia. |
- Coach brand has demonstrated durable pricing power and consistent demand within the accessible luxury handbag category
- Direct-to-consumer sales channel provides higher margins and closer customer relationships than wholesale distribution
- International expansion, particularly in Asian markets, provides an additional growth avenue beyond North America
- Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger are globally recognized lifestyle brands with broad international distribution
- Diversified brand portfolio spans multiple apparel and accessory categories, reducing single-brand concentration risk
- Licensing model for certain product categories provides additional royalty revenue with lower capital intensity
- Kate Spade brand has faced periods of softer performance, requiring ongoing turnaround and repositioning effort
- Accessible luxury category faces competitive pressure from both luxury and mass-market fashion brands
- China market exposure introduces sensitivity to Chinese consumer spending trends and geopolitical factors
- Apparel brands face ongoing competitive pressure from both fast fashion and other established lifestyle brand competitors
- International revenue exposure, particularly in Europe, introduces currency translation and regional demand sensitivity
- Margin recovery efforts depend on successfully managing promotional activity and inventory levels across its brand portfolio
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on TPR and PVH. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside TPR and PVH, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.