BURL vs ROST Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
BURL (Burlington Stores) and ROST (Ross Stores) are both major U.S. off-price retailers selling discounted brand-name merchandise — Ross is the more established, higher-margin operator with over 2,000 stores, while Burlington is on a multi-year operational improvement journey with a smaller-format strategy to catch up to Ross and TJX margins.
BURL vs ROST is off-price retail turnaround opportunity (Burlington's margin gap closing) versus off-price retail excellence (Ross's consistent execution and buyback return) — both benefiting from department store share loss but at different points on the quality spectrum.
ROST holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. ROST has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+55.12% vs -10.48%), though BURL has the better forward P/E setup (19.16x vs 25.61x for ROST). ROST leads on both revenue growth (13.30%) and operating margin (17.62%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for BURL (+39.87%) than for ROST (+18.11%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want off-price retail exposure with a turnaround angle — Burlington's margin gap to Ross and TJX represents upside if its operational improvements execute as planned
- Value Burlington's smaller store format strategy as a path to more store locations and better inventory productivity than competitors with large-format stores
- See Burlington's lower current margins as opportunity rather than a red flag — the gap versus Ross reflects execution potential, not structural disadvantage
- Want the best-executed, highest-margin U.S. off-price retailer after TJX, with consistent comparable store sales and a long track record of shareholder value creation
- Value Ross's dd's DISCOUNTS chain as incremental market coverage at a lower price point and its disciplined buyback program returning steady free cash flow
- Prefer proven off-price execution and consistent margin performance over the turnaround potential of a lower-margin operator like Burlington
| Metric | BURL | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 47.2 | 55.8 |
| AI ranki | #666 | #258 |
| Latest closei | $237.12 | $226.61 |
| 1M returni | -29.74% | -3.44% |
| 6M returni | -24.00% | +7.57% |
| 1Y returni | -10.48% | +55.12% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | BURL | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $8.95K (-10.5%) started 2025-09-18 | $15.51K (+55.1%) started 2025-09-18 |
| 5Y ago | $8.11K (-18.9%) started 2021-09-20 | $21.76K (+117.6%) started 2021-09-20 |
| 10Y ago | $28.38K (+183.8%) started 2016-09-19 | $43.01K (+330.1%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | BURL | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $16.38B | $73.31B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 23.41 | 27.64 |
| Forward P/Ei | 19.16 | 25.61 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 2.22 |
| EV/Revenuei | 1.77 | 2.98 |
| Analyst targeti | $364.75 | $269.94 |
| Target upsidei | +39.87% | +18.11% |
| Metric | BURL | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 11.00% | 13.30% |
| Earnings growthi | 95.90% | 70.50% |
| EPS growthi | +95.90% | +70.50% |
| FCF margini | +0.88% | +8.80% |
| Operating margini | 6.72% | 17.62% |
| Profit margini | 5.85% | 10.85% |
| ROIC proxyi | 41.41% | 42.63% |
| Return on equityi | 41.41% | 42.63% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 0.78% |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 20.56% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | No increase yet |
| Betai | 1.47 | 0.88 |
| Debt/equityi | 294.97 | 70.28 |
| Current ratioi | 1.17 | 1.61 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.38 | 0.93 |
Over the past year, BURL and ROST have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.53), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | BURL | ROST |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -10.48% | +55.12% |
| CAGRi | -10.49% | +55.16% | |
| Volatilityi | 40.20% | 26.46% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.19 | 1.63 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.25 | 2.75 | |
| Max drawdowni | 38.93% | 13.03% | |
| Current drawdowni | 36.29% | 11.21% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.72% | 2.60% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 10.52% | 4.27% | |
| Max daily dropi | 12.24% | 5.89% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.44% | 11.87% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -18.87% | +108.66% |
| CAGRi | -4.10% | +15.87% | |
| Volatilityi | 44.42% | 29.64% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.02 | 0.50 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.04 | 0.71 | |
| Max drawdowni | 64.34% | 40.72% | |
| Current drawdowni | 36.29% | 11.21% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 26.53% | 8.98% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 31.75% | 12.71% | |
| Max daily dropi | 14.95% | 22.47% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 23.34% | 21.93% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +183.84% | +293.94% |
| CAGRi | +11.00% | +14.70% | |
| Volatilityi | 42.08% | 31.82% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.35 | 0.45 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.52 | 0.65 | |
| Max drawdowni | 68.87% | 51.41% | |
| Current drawdowni | 36.29% | 11.21% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 21.24% | 10.49% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 28.38% | 14.68% | |
| Max daily dropi | 29.83% | 22.47% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 38.37% | 38.97% |
| Category | BURL | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Burlington Stores, Inc. | Ross Stores, Inc. |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Apparel Retail | Apparel Retail |
| Core business | Burlington Stores is a major U.S. off-price retailer selling discounted brand-name apparel, footwear, accessories, and home goods at 20-60% off department store prices across approximately 1,000 stores — focusing on a smaller store format strategy and more frequent merchandise turnover. | Ross Stores is the second-largest U.S. off-price retailer (behind TJX), operating Ross Dress for Less stores and dd's DISCOUNTS for more budget-conscious shoppers, selling brand-name apparel, accessories, footwear, and home goods at significant discounts across approximately 2,000+ stores. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Burlington's comparable store sales, new store openings and productivity, merchandise margins, and the company's execution of its smaller-store format strategy as a path to better returns and expanded addressable store locations. | Investors track Ross's comparable store sales, merchandise margins, new store openings, and the company's consistent execution of the off-price model as one of the best-managed and most profitable specialty retailers in the U.S. |
- Off-price retail model benefits from department store distress — as department stores reduce purchasing commitments, more opportunistic branded merchandise becomes available to off-price buyers
- Burlington's smaller store format strategy (relative to TJX and Ross) allows expansion into more markets and locations while improving inventory turn and fresh merchandise perception
- Off-price shopping provides a compelling value proposition that gains share during consumer spending downturns as shoppers trade from full-price retail
- Industry-leading off-price execution — Ross has consistently delivered strong comparable store sales and operating margins, outperforming both department stores and Burlington
- dd's DISCOUNTS provides a lower price point tier that serves budget consumers and expands the total addressable market
- Strong balance sheet and consistent buyback program — Ross has returned significant capital to shareholders through decades of disciplined free cash flow generation
- Burlington has lower operating margins than TJX and Ross — the company is in a multi-year journey to close the margin gap through buying organization improvements and mix optimization
- Smaller store format strategy reduces average inventory depth versus larger format competitors — execution requires rapid inventory turnover and disciplined buying
- Burlington's fashion and apparel mix (higher exposure to women's apparel than competitors) can be more volatile than Ross's more diversified off-price assortment
- Ross operates in a highly competitive off-price market — TJX (Marshalls, T.J. Maxx) is significantly larger and has more brand awareness advantages in many markets
- Off-price retail's treasure-hunt model depends on consistent merchandise flow — if branded vendors tighten distribution and reduce off-price availability, sourcing quality can suffer
- Real estate market dynamics affect new store opening productivity — rising retail rents in some markets increase occupancy costs for new Ross locations
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.