HUT vs MARA Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
HUT (Hut 8) and MARA (Marathon Digital) are both publicly traded Bitcoin miners with significant Bitcoin balance sheet holdings, but with different strategic approaches — Marathon is the largest U.S. public Bitcoin miner focused on pure-play scale, while Hut 8 has diversified into HPC/AI compute to reduce Bitcoin-only dependency. Both companies' fortunes are heavily tied to Bitcoin's price and the economics of Bitcoin mining post-halving.
HUT vs MARA is diversified Bitcoin mining and HPC/AI infrastructure company (Hut 8's strategic pivot adding GPU compute for AI workloads alongside Bitcoin mining to reduce pure Bitcoin price dependence) versus largest U.S. pure-play public Bitcoin miner pursuing scale and hashrate leadership (Marathon's maximum Bitcoin mining capacity strategy holding substantial BTC on balance sheet for maximum Bitcoin price leverage) — diversification strategy versus concentrated pure-play scale.
HUT holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. HUT leads on both 1-year return (+630.71%) and forward P/E (-66.99x vs -16.44x for MARA), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for MARA (+23.57%) than for HUT (-4.37%).
- →Want Bitcoin mining exposure with partial HPC/AI revenue diversification — Hut 8's GPU compute business reduces the pure-play Bitcoin price dependency that characterizes Marathon
- →Believe AI compute demand creates a strategic asset value in Hut 8's HPC infrastructure independent of Bitcoin mining revenue
- →Value Hut 8's balance sheet Bitcoin holdings as Treasury leverage to Bitcoin price appreciation within a company that also has diversifying business revenue from AI and HPC services
- →Want maximum Bitcoin price exposure through the largest U.S. public Bitcoin miner — Marathon's scale and pure-play focus provides the highest public-market beta to Bitcoin price among major U.S. miners
- →Value Marathon's hashrate leadership as competitive advantage enabling it to mine the most Bitcoin per dollar of operational efficiency investment
- →See Bitcoin's halving cycle and long-term scarcity narrative as supporting the case for holding Bitcoin-correlated mining companies like Marathon through the inevitable price cycles
| Metric | HUT | MARA |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 48.1 | 25.7 |
| AI rank | #572 | #2703 |
| Latest close | $124.44 | $14.22 |
| 1M return | +33.36% | +14.31% |
| 6M return | +209.86% | +43.20% |
| 1Y return | +630.71% | -1.86% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | HUT | MARA |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $73.07K (+630.7%) started 2025-06-18 | $9.81K (-1.9%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $66.37K (+563.7%) started 2021-06-18 | $4.92K (-50.8%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $69.19K (+591.9%) started 2018-03-08 | $3.67K (-63.3%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | HUT | MARA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $14.01B | $5.42B |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/E | -66.99 | -16.44 |
| Price/Sales | 49.28 | 6.25 |
| EV/Revenue | 50.12 | 8.70 |
| Analyst target | $119.00 | $17.57 |
| Target upside | -4.37% | +23.57% |
| Metric | HUT | MARA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 225.50% | -18.40% |
| Earnings growth | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growth | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margin | -105.73% | -61.20% |
| Operating margin | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margin | -109.77% | -234.83% |
| ROIC proxy | -27.40% | -67.33% |
| Return on equity | -27.40% | -67.33% |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Beta | 6.04 | 5.38 |
| Debt/equity | 25.02 | 105.60 |
| Current ratio | 0.86 | 1.84 |
| Quick ratio | 0.66 | 1.63 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | HUT | MARA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +630.71% | -1.86% |
| CAGR | +631.71% | -1.86% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.41 | 0.31 | |
| Max drawdown | 38.62% | 70.53% | |
| Max daily drop | 17.89% | 18.72% | |
| Max wkly drop | 27.95% | 31.74% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +563.68% | -50.83% |
| CAGR | +46.02% | -13.24% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.84 | 0.34 | |
| Max drawdown | 95.04% | 95.86% | |
| Max daily drop | 24.04% | 27.03% | |
| Max wkly drop | 41.21% | 43.81% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +591.91% | -63.27% |
| CAGR | +26.32% | -9.54% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.72 | 0.52 | |
| Max drawdown | 95.04% | 99.19% | |
| Max daily drop | 24.04% | 40.86% | |
| Max wkly drop | 47.57% | 52.63% |
| Category | HUT | MARA |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Hut 8 Corp | Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology - Bitcoin Mining & HPC | Technology - Bitcoin Mining |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | Hut 8 Corp is a digital asset infrastructure operator following the merger of Hut 8 Mining Corp (Canada) and US Bitcoin Corp in 2023. Hut 8 mines Bitcoin using ASIC mining hardware across multiple data center sites and has diversified into high-performance computing (HPC) services — providing GPU compute infrastructure for AI model training and inference workloads. Hut 8 holds a significant amount of self-mined Bitcoin on its balance sheet as a treasury asset. | Marathon Digital Holdings is the largest publicly traded Bitcoin mining company by hashrate capacity in the United States. Marathon mines Bitcoin using ASIC hardware across large-scale mining facilities, and holds substantial Bitcoin on its corporate treasury. Marathon has expanded from solely owning mining equipment to also operating mining sites, acquiring data centers to improve control over operations and costs. Marathon's strategy is primarily Bitcoin mining scale — becoming the most efficient large-scale miner with the most hashrate. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Hut 8's Bitcoin mined per day (hashrate x network reward), Bitcoin held on balance sheet, HPC/AI compute revenue and capacity, energy costs per Bitcoin mined (the key margin driver), and the balance between Bitcoin mining and HPC diversification strategy. | Investors track Marathon's hashrate (total mining power — measured in exahashes per second, EH/s), Bitcoin mined monthly, Bitcoin balance sheet holdings, electricity cost per kilowatt-hour, and the path to improved mining efficiency (energy per terahash) with next-generation ASIC hardware. |
- →HPC/AI diversification reduces pure Bitcoin price dependency — Hut 8's investment in GPU compute for AI workloads provides revenue stream not directly tied to Bitcoin's price; during Bitcoin price bear markets, HPC revenue provides cash flow support
- →Balance sheet Bitcoin holdings provide leverage to Bitcoin price appreciation — Hut 8's practice of retaining self-mined Bitcoin (rather than selling immediately) creates balance sheet leverage to Bitcoin price; Bitcoin price increases directly increase net asset value
- →Post-merger scale with Canadian and U.S. mining sites — the Hut 8 / US Bitcoin Corp merger created a combined entity with more geographic diversification and mining site diversity than either predecessor company alone
- →Largest U.S. public Bitcoin miner by installed hashrate — Marathon's scale provides negotiating leverage for mining hardware purchases and potentially electricity contracts; scale allows faster adoption of new-generation ASICs as they become available
- →Corporate Bitcoin treasury creates balance sheet exposure to Bitcoin price appreciation — Marathon holds substantial self-mined Bitcoin; Bitcoin price increases translate directly into balance sheet value appreciation
- →Focus on operational excellence in pure-play Bitcoin mining — Marathon's focused Bitcoin mining strategy avoids the strategic distraction of diversification; operational excellence in mining efficiency (improving joules per terahash) is the primary competitive advantage
- →Bitcoin halving reduces mining reward — approximately every 4 years, the Bitcoin block reward halves (most recently halved in April 2024, reducing block reward from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC); each halving cuts mining revenue per block; surviving the halving requires either Bitcoin price increase or efficient hashrate/cost management
- →Electricity cost is the dominant profit driver — Bitcoin mining profitability depends on electricity cost per kilowatt-hour versus the Bitcoin price and mining difficulty; operations in high-electricity-cost regions can be unprofitable even when Bitcoin prices are favorable
- →Bitcoin price volatility directly impacts revenue and balance sheet — as a Bitcoin miner holding BTC on balance sheet, Hut 8's financial performance is highly correlated with Bitcoin's price; Bitcoin bear markets severely impair mining revenue and asset values
- →Pure-play Bitcoin mining has extreme Bitcoin price beta — Marathon's revenue, cash flow, and balance sheet value are almost entirely determined by Bitcoin price; Bitcoin bear markets can make mining unprofitable and reduce balance sheet Bitcoin values simultaneously
- →Mining difficulty continuously increases as global hashrate grows — as more miners come online with new equipment, Bitcoin's protocol automatically adjusts difficulty upward; maintaining competitive economics requires continuous reinvestment in more efficient ASICs
- →ASIC hardware capital requirements are substantial — next-generation mining ASICs (Bitmain Antminer S21, WhatsMiner M60) cost $20-40+ per terahash; staying competitive requires ongoing capital investment that dilutes shareholders or requires debt financing
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.