JNJ vs GSK Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Johnson & Johnson and GSK are both major global healthcare companies with vaccine and pharmaceutical operations, but Johnson & Johnson maintains a diversified US-based business spanning pharmaceuticals and medical devices, while GSK operates as a UK-based, more focused biopharmaceutical company following its consumer health business separation.
Johnson & Johnson offers exposure to a diversified healthcare business spanning pharmaceuticals and medical devices with a long dividend growth history, while GSK offers a more focused biopharmaceutical strategy centered on vaccines and specialty medicines following its corporate restructuring. Consider whether you prefer Johnson & Johnson's diversification or GSK's more concentrated post-separation strategy.
GSK holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. JNJ has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+54.62% vs +30.41%), though GSK has the better forward P/E setup (10.02x vs 21.78x for JNJ). On fundamentals, JNJ is growing revenue faster (6.60%), while GSK maintains the higher operating margin (30.94%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for GSK (+17.41%) than for JNJ (+1.66%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want diversified exposure to both pharmaceuticals and medical devices
- Value a long-standing history as a dividend aristocrat with reliable income growth
- Believe diversification across multiple therapeutic areas reduces single-product concentration risk
- Prefer a US-based healthcare stalwart with a long operating history
- Want exposure to a leading global vaccine portfolio and infectious disease research expertise
- Believe a more focused biopharmaceutical strategy can improve capital allocation efficiency
- Value international diversification, particularly exposure to European healthcare markets
- Are comfortable with execution risk tied to the company's post-separation standalone strategy
| Metric | JNJ | GSK |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 48.7 | 41.1 |
| AI ranki | #534 | #944 |
| Latest closei | $275.23 | $49.89 |
| 1M returni | +6.85% | -2.17% |
| 6M returni | +14.86% | -8.09% |
| 1Y returni | +54.62% | +30.41% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | JNJ | GSK |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $15.4K (+54.0%) started 2025-09-04 | $13.52K (+35.2%) started 2025-09-04 |
| 5Y ago | $19.66K (+96.6%) started 2021-09-07 | $18.66K (+86.6%) started 2021-09-07 |
| 10Y ago | $37.74K (+277.4%) started 2016-09-06 | $32.44K (+224.4%) started 2016-09-06 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | JNJ | GSK |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $645.95B | $99.92B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 31.06 | 15.69 |
| Forward P/Ei | 21.78 | 10.02 |
| Price/Salesi | 4.18 | 3.01 |
| EV/Revenuei | 6.88 | 3.45 |
| Analyst targeti | $272.50 | $58.58 |
| Target upsidei | +1.66% | +17.41% |
| Metric | JNJ | GSK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 6.60% | 5.30% |
| Earnings growthi | -0.90% | -69.50% |
| EPS growthi | -0.90% | -69.50% |
| FCF margini | +17.24% | +10.49% |
| Operating margini | 29.19% | 30.94% |
| Profit margini | 21.48% | 14.52% |
| ROIC proxyi | 25.74% | 33.38% |
| Return on equityi | 25.74% | 33.38% |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.00% | 3.64% |
| Betai | 0.23 | 0.29 |
| Debt/equityi | 57.71 | 106.50 |
| Current ratioi | 1.09 | 0.81 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.72 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, JNJ and GSK have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.48), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | JNJ | GSK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +53.97% | +30.41% |
| CAGRi | +54.06% | +30.44% | |
| Volatilityi | 19.00% | 26.86% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 2.13 | 0.96 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 3.42 | 1.50 | |
| Max drawdowni | 10.96% | 18.53% | |
| Current drawdowni | 1.15% | 16.30% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 2.86% | 7.37% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 4.06% | 9.61% | |
| Max daily dropi | 3.66% | 5.64% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 6.22% | 7.81% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +76.78% | +49.19% |
| CAGRi | +12.09% | +8.35% | |
| Volatilityi | 17.60% | 24.24% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.48 | 0.27 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.71 | 0.39 | |
| Max drawdowni | 18.41% | 37.63% | |
| Current drawdowni | 1.15% | 16.30% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 7.19% | 12.87% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 8.65% | 15.51% | |
| Max daily dropi | 7.59% | 8.69% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 9.18% | 13.87% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +190.37% | +80.32% |
| CAGRi | +11.26% | +6.08% | |
| Volatilityi | 18.83% | 22.34% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.42 | 0.18 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.60 | 0.25 | |
| Max drawdowni | 27.37% | 37.63% | |
| Current drawdowni | 1.15% | 16.30% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.40% | 10.82% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 7.97% | 13.43% | |
| Max daily dropi | 10.04% | 11.04% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 13.25% | 17.31% |
| Category | JNJ | GSK |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Johnson & Johnson | GSK plc |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Core business | A diversified global healthcare company operating pharmaceutical and medical device segments, developing treatments across immunology, oncology, and neuroscience while manufacturing a broad range of medical devices used in surgery and other procedures. | A UK-based global biopharmaceutical company focused on vaccines, specialty medicines, and general medicines, following the separation of its consumer health business, with an emphasis on infectious disease and immunology research. |
| Investor focus | Pharmaceutical pipeline progress across key therapeutic areas, medical device segment growth, and dividend growth track record as a long-standing dividend aristocrat. | Vaccine portfolio growth and pipeline progress, specialty medicine revenue trends following the consumer health separation, and dividend sustainability as a standalone biopharmaceutical company. |
- Diversified business spanning pharmaceuticals and medical devices reduces dependence on any single product category or therapeutic area
- Long-standing history as a dividend aristocrat provides a reliable and growing income stream for shareholders
- Broad pipeline across immunology, oncology, and neuroscience supports multiple avenues for future growth
- Leading vaccine portfolio and research expertise provide a differentiated position in infectious disease prevention
- Focused biopharmaceutical strategy following the consumer health separation allows more concentrated capital allocation toward vaccines and specialty medicines
- Established international presence, particularly in Europe, supports geographic diversification
- Faces ongoing patent expirations across its pharmaceutical portfolio that require pipeline replenishment to offset revenue loss
- Medical device segment growth is tied to elective procedure volumes, which can be sensitive to broader healthcare spending trends
- Legal and litigation matters have historically created periodic overhangs on investor sentiment
- Standalone biopharmaceutical structure following the consumer health separation carries execution risk as the company builds its focused strategy
- Vaccine revenue can be more variable than steady prescription drug revenue, tied to public health demand cycles
- Faces ongoing patent expirations and competitive pressure across its specialty and general medicines portfolio
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.