HAL vs BKR Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Halliburton and Baker Hughes are both major oilfield services companies, but Halliburton is more concentrated in core drilling and completion services, while Baker Hughes has diversified further into industrial energy technology, including a growing LNG equipment business.
HAL offers more direct exposure to drilling and completion activity cycles, while BKR offers diversification into LNG equipment and industrial energy technology. The decision depends on whether you prefer concentrated oilfield services exposure or a broader industrial energy technology mix.
HAL holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. HAL leads on both 1-year return (+67.74%) and forward P/E quality (12.47x vs 19.75x for BKR), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, HAL is growing revenue faster (3.70%), while BKR maintains the higher operating margin (12.83%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for HAL (+19.18%) than for BKR (+15.58%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want more direct exposure to drilling and completion services activity cycles
- Believe North American shale completion activity will remain a durable revenue driver
- Value the company's broad international customer relationships
- Prefer a more concentrated oilfield services business model
- Want diversified exposure spanning oilfield services and industrial energy technology
- See global LNG infrastructure buildout as a durable long-term growth driver
- Believe energy transition technology investment can open new long-term markets
- Prefer a company less reliant on drilling activity alone for its revenue base
| Metric | HAL | BKR |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 29.5 | 43.2 |
| AI ranki | #2314 | #864 |
| Latest closei | $37.07 | $63.50 |
| 1M returni | +16.24% | +3.17% |
| 6M returni | +6.98% | +5.66% |
| 1Y returni | +67.74% | +39.32% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | HAL | BKR |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $17.03K (+70.3%) started 2025-09-08 | $13.91K (+39.1%) started 2025-09-08 |
| 5Y ago | $21.76K (+117.6%) started 2021-09-09 | $32.7K (+227.0%) started 2021-09-09 |
| 10Y ago | $12.27K (+22.7%) started 2016-09-09 | $48.61K (+386.1%) started 2016-09-09 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | HAL | BKR |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $30.14B | $61.95B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 18.94 | 20.07 |
| Forward P/Ei | 12.47 | 19.75 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 1.62 | 2.21 |
| Analyst targeti | $43.12 | $72.13 |
| Target upsidei | +19.18% | +15.58% |
| Metric | HAL | BKR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 3.70% | -2.40% |
| Earnings growthi | 16.10% | -4.20% |
| EPS growthi | +16.10% | -4.20% |
| FCF margini | +9.17% | +15.92% |
| Operating margini | 12.79% | 12.83% |
| Profit margini | 7.16% | 11.17% |
| ROIC proxyi | 14.92% | 16.46% |
| Return on equityi | 14.92% | 16.46% |
| Dividend yieldi | 1.88% | 1.47% |
| Betai | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| Debt/equityi | 74.19 | 80.92 |
| Current ratioi | 2.02 | 2.10 |
| Quick ratioi | 1.25 | 1.62 |
Over the past year, HAL and BKR have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.60), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | HAL | BKR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +70.28% | +39.13% |
| CAGRi | +70.45% | +39.22% | |
| Volatilityi | 35.72% | 32.58% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.55 | 1.04 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 2.51 | 1.55 | |
| Max drawdowni | 27.43% | 24.24% | |
| Current drawdowni | 13.75% | 8.86% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 7.07% | 6.90% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 10.61% | 8.95% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.11% | 5.95% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 12.15% | 9.28% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +104.08% | +196.72% |
| CAGRi | +15.34% | +24.31% | |
| Volatilityi | 39.68% | 34.65% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.45 | 0.68 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.64 | 0.98 | |
| Max drawdowni | 54.01% | 46.53% | |
| Current drawdowni | 13.75% | 8.86% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 21.48% | 12.24% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 25.93% | 15.64% | |
| Max daily dropi | 12.88% | 13.34% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 24.62% | 21.87% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +3.43% | +134.48% |
| CAGRi | +0.34% | +8.90% | |
| Volatilityi | 46.02% | 39.01% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.15 | 0.30 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.20 | 0.43 | |
| Max drawdowni | 91.45% | 78.32% | |
| Current drawdowni | 25.71% | 8.86% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 40.35% | 27.32% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 44.93% | 33.17% | |
| Max daily dropi | 37.64% | 22.26% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 56.45% | 36.91% |
| Category | HAL | BKR |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Halliburton Company | Baker Hughes Company |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Core business | A global oilfield services company providing drilling, completion, and production services and equipment to upstream oil and gas operators across North America and international markets. | An energy technology company providing oilfield services alongside industrial and energy technology products, including LNG equipment, gas turbines, and other technology aimed at both traditional and lower-carbon energy infrastructure. |
| Investor focus | North American completions activity levels, international market share growth, and margin performance across drilling and production service lines. | LNG and industrial equipment order backlog growth, digital and energy transition technology investment returns, and margin trends across its oilfield services and industrial segments. |
- Leading position in completion services gives the company strong exposure to hydraulic fracturing and well completion activity cycles
- Broad international footprint provides revenue diversification beyond North American drilling activity levels
- Long operating history has built deep customer relationships across major oil and gas producers worldwide
- Diversified business mix spanning traditional oilfield services and industrial energy technology reduces reliance on drilling activity alone
- Growing LNG equipment business provides exposure to global natural gas infrastructure buildout independent of near-term drilling cycles
- Strategic positioning toward energy transition technology offers potential long-term diversification beyond traditional oil and gas services
- Revenue remains closely tied to upstream drilling and completion activity, which fluctuates with oil and gas capital spending cycles
- North American shale activity levels can be particularly volatile relative to more stable international activity
- Competitive pricing pressure among oilfield services providers can compress margins during periods of oversupplied service capacity
- LNG equipment order timing can be lumpy, creating variability in revenue recognition from quarter to quarter
- Balancing investment between traditional oilfield services and newer energy transition technology requires careful capital allocation
- Industrial technology segment still competes against large, well-established industrial equipment manufacturers
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.