SLB vs HAL Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
SLB and Halliburton are both leading global oilfield services companies, but SLB derives a larger share of revenue from international, longer-cycle projects, while Halliburton maintains a heavier weighting toward North American shale drilling and completion services alongside a growing international segment.
SLB offers exposure to longer-cycle international oilfield services demand with a broad global technology portfolio, while Halliburton offers more direct leverage to North American shale drilling activity alongside growing international diversification. Consider whether you prefer SLB's international stability or Halliburton's North American shale cycle leverage.
HAL holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. SLB has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+48.14% vs +33.48%), though HAL has the better forward P/E setup (12.47x vs 17.74x for SLB). On fundamentals, SLB is growing revenue faster (5.00%), while HAL maintains the higher operating margin (12.79%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for HAL (+19.18%) than for SLB (+8.03%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want exposure to longer-cycle international oilfield services demand less tied to short-term shale volatility
- Value a broad global technology portfolio spanning digital, drilling, and production services
- Believe established relationships with national oil companies support durable competitive positioning
- Are comfortable with currency translation risk from substantial international revenue
- Want more direct leverage to North American shale drilling and completion activity cycles
- Believe growing international operations can diversify revenue over time
- Are comfortable with higher sensitivity to short-cycle US shale drilling volatility
- Value technology-driven completion services tailored to shale operators
| Metric | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 29.3 | 29.1 |
| AI ranki | #2244 | #2255 |
| Latest closei | $53.08 | $35.44 |
| 1M returni | +2.99% | +8.18% |
| 3M returni | +3.01% | +10.30% |
| 6M returni | -3.89% | -11.69% |
| 1Y returni | +48.14% | +33.48% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $14.68K (+46.8%) started 2025-10-27 | $13.22K (+32.2%) started 2025-10-27 |
| 5Y ago | $18.82K (+88.2%) started 2021-10-27 | $16K (+60.0%) started 2021-10-27 |
| 10Y ago | $11.11K (+11.1%) started 2016-10-27 | $10.35K (+3.5%) started 2016-10-27 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $85.09B | $30.14B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 27.97 | 18.94 |
| Forward P/Ei | 17.74 | 12.47 |
| Price/Salesi | 1.27 | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 2.61 | 1.62 |
| Analyst targeti | $61.93 | $43.12 |
| Target upsidei | +8.03% | +19.18% |
| Metric | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 5.00% | 3.70% |
| Earnings growthi | -29.70% | 16.10% |
| EPS growthi | -29.70% | +16.10% |
| FCF margini | +8.13% | +9.17% |
| Operating margini | 12.71% | 12.79% |
| Profit margini | 8.53% | 7.16% |
| ROIC proxyi | 12.91% | 14.92% |
| Return on equityi | 12.91% | 14.92% |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.06% | 1.88% |
| Payout ratioi | 56.04% | 35.79% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | No increase yet |
| Betai | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Debt/equityi | 47.00 | 74.19 |
| Current ratioi | 1.44 | 2.02 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.94 | 1.25 |
Over the past year, SLB and HAL have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.75), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +46.79% | +32.24% |
| CAGRi | +46.97% | +32.36% | |
| Volatilityi | 36.78% | 32.75% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.11 | 0.89 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.75 | 1.33 | |
| Max drawdowni | 22.27% | 27.43% | |
| Current drawdowni | 11.68% | 17.54% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.97% | 9.62% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 9.61% | 13.30% | |
| Max daily dropi | 7.49% | 5.47% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 14.65% | 12.15% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +74.94% | +50.06% |
| CAGRi | +11.84% | +8.46% | |
| Volatilityi | 37.60% | 39.39% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.37 | 0.29 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.53 | 0.41 | |
| Max drawdowni | 47.02% | 54.01% | |
| Current drawdowni | 11.68% | 17.54% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 19.83% | 21.92% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 23.73% | 26.14% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.60% | 12.88% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 24.29% | 24.62% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -15.21% | -12.76% |
| CAGRi | -1.64% | -1.36% | |
| Volatilityi | 40.93% | 46.03% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.06 | 0.11 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.08 | 0.15 | |
| Max drawdowni | 84.29% | 91.45% | |
| Current drawdowni | 23.31% | 28.97% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 40.05% | 40.77% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 44.27% | 45.09% | |
| Max daily dropi | 27.42% | 37.64% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 44.17% | 56.45% |
| Category | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Company | SLB (Schlumberger Limited) | Halliburton Company |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Core business | A global oilfield services company that provides technology, equipment, and services used in oil and gas exploration, drilling, and production, with a revenue base heavily weighted toward international markets outside North America. | A global oilfield services company with a revenue mix more heavily weighted toward North American shale drilling and completion services, alongside a growing international operations segment. |
| Investor focus | International drilling and production activity trends, digital and technology-driven service adoption, and operating margin expansion across its global service segments. | North American rig count and completion activity trends, international segment growth, and operating margin trends amid a competitive services pricing environment. |
- Heavy weighting toward international markets provides exposure to long-cycle offshore and national oil company projects less tied to short-term North American shale volatility
- Broad technology portfolio spanning digital solutions, drilling, and production services supports differentiated, higher-margin offerings
- Global scale and established relationships with national oil companies support a durable competitive position in key international markets
- Strong position in North American shale completion services provides direct leverage to US drilling activity cycles
- Growing international operations segment provides diversification beyond North American market dependence
- Technology-driven completion and production optimization services support differentiated offerings for shale operators
- International project activity can be lumpy, tied to long-cycle investment decisions by national oil companies and major operators
- Currency translation risk is elevated given the company's substantial international revenue exposure
- Faces ongoing pricing competition from other global oilfield services providers across service lines
- Greater North American revenue concentration exposes results more directly to short-cycle US shale drilling volatility
- Faces intense pricing competition in the North American oilfield services market during periods of softer drilling activity
- Margins can compress quickly during industry downturns given the shorter-cycle nature of its core North American business
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on SLB and HAL. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside SLB and HAL, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.