NOC vs GD Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
NOC is deeply focused on nuclear deterrence, space systems, and advanced classified programs — the most strategically sensitive parts of the U.S. defense budget — while GD is more diversified across submarines, vehicles, business jets, and IT services. Both are premier defense contractors with strong government relationships and long-duration program revenues.
NOC vs GD compares two complementary defense contractors with different program concentration: Northrop's nuclear and space dominance versus General Dynamics' submarine, combat vehicle, and aerospace diversification.
NOC holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. GD has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+27.04% vs +7.32%), though NOC has the better forward P/E setup (18.20x vs 20.56x for GD). On fundamentals, GD is growing revenue faster (10.30%), while NOC maintains the higher operating margin (11.69%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for NOC (+25.56%) than for GD (+5.19%).
- →Want defense exposure through the contractor dominating nuclear deterrence and classified space programs
- →Believe B-21 Raider program production ramp will drive sustained multi-decade revenue
- →See NOC's classified, sole-source programs as uniquely protected from competition
- →Want more diversified defense exposure spanning submarines, vehicles, business jets, and IT services
- →Value Gulfstream's commercial aviation exposure as a complement to defense cyclicality
- →Believe nuclear submarine production ramp for Columbia-class will drive long-term GD growth
| Metric | NOC | GD |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 50.5 | 51.7 |
| AI rank | #388 | #329 |
| Latest close | $545.11 | $374.31 |
| 1M return | +0.80% | +9.81% |
| 6M return | -10.73% | +3.77% |
| 1Y return | +7.32% | +27.04% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | NOC | GD |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $10.8K (+8.0%) started 2025-07-08 | $12.62K (+26.2%) started 2025-07-08 |
| 5Y ago | $16.57K (+65.7%) started 2021-07-09 | $23.27K (+132.7%) started 2021-07-09 |
| 10Y ago | $32.82K (+228.2%) started 2016-07-11 | $39.8K (+298.0%) started 2016-07-11 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | NOC | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $77.98B | $101.02B |
| Trailing P/E | 17.21 | 23.52 |
| Forward P/E | 18.20 | 20.56 |
| Price/Sales | 1.74 | N/A |
| EV/Revenue | 2.21 | 1.99 |
| Analyst target | $689.33 | $392.93 |
| Target upside | +25.56% | +5.19% |
| Metric | NOC | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 4.40% | 10.30% |
| Earnings growth | 84.90% | 12.00% |
| EPS growth | +84.90% | +12.00% |
| FCF margin | +4.89% | +9.83% |
| Operating margin | 11.69% | 10.54% |
| Profit margin | 10.80% | 8.07% |
| ROIC proxy | 28.51% | 17.97% |
| Return on equity | 28.51% | 17.97% |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 1.70% |
| Beta | -0.10 | 0.34 |
| Debt/equity | 102.68 | 37.70 |
| Current ratio | 1.15 | 1.38 |
| Quick ratio | 0.98 | 0.80 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | NOC | GD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +7.97% | +26.18% |
| CAGR | +7.99% | +26.22% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.25 | 0.95 | |
| Max drawdown | 35.42% | 15.23% | |
| Max daily drop | 6.98% | 4.18% | |
| Max wkly drop | 13.55% | 6.86% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +55.76% | +113.66% |
| CAGR | +9.27% | +16.41% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.30 | 0.62 | |
| Max drawdown | 35.42% | 22.55% | |
| Max daily drop | 12.66% | 7.27% | |
| Max wkly drop | 13.85% | 10.82% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +182.50% | +221.90% |
| CAGR | +10.95% | +12.41% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.36 | 0.43 | |
| Max drawdown | 36.38% | 51.63% | |
| Max daily drop | 12.66% | 10.93% | |
| Max wkly drop | 16.45% | 19.06% |
| Category | NOC | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Northrop Grumman Corporation | General Dynamics Corporation |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | N/A |
| Core business | Northrop Grumman is a leading defense technology company specializing in nuclear deterrence (B-21 Raider bomber, GBSD ICBM successor), space systems (James Webb Telescope, classified satellite programs), and cyber/intelligence solutions. | General Dynamics operates across four business segments: Aerospace (Gulfstream business jets), Marine Systems (nuclear submarines — Virginia class, Columbia class), Combat Systems (Abrams tank, Stryker), and Technologies (IT services for U.S. government). |
| Investor focus | Investors track Northrop's B-21 Raider bomber program ramp, GBSD (now Sentinel ICBM) program development, space and classified program backlog growth, and the resolution of cost overruns on certain fixed-price programs. | Investors track General Dynamics' Gulfstream business jet deliveries and backlog, nuclear submarine production ramp, army vehicle modernization programs, and the growing IT services business supporting government agencies. |
- →Sole-source position on the B-21 Raider next-generation stealth bomber — the most strategically important new defense platform in a generation
- →Deep expertise in classified space programs provides high-visibility revenue hidden from competitors
- →Nuclear deterrence programs have extraordinary multi-decade visibility given national security priority
- →Virginia-class and Columbia-class nuclear submarine programs provide decades of production visibility and sole-source positions
- →Gulfstream business jets provide high-margin commercial aerospace diversification alongside government defense programs
- →Army vehicle modernization and sustainment for Abrams tanks provides stable international and domestic revenue
- →Fixed-price development contracts on major programs have created earnings pressure when costs exceed estimates
- →Programs with strategic national importance can also carry significant development cost risk before achieving production
- →Transition from development to production on key programs creates near-term financial profile complexity
- →Submarine production ramp requires significant skilled workforce and supply chain capacity at Electric Boat
- →Gulfstream business jet demand is tied to the economic cycle of high-net-worth and corporate customers
- →IT services segment (GDIT) operates in a competitive government IT market with more commoditized margins
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.