LYFT vs GRAB Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Lyft and Grab both operate ridesharing platforms, but Lyft is a focused North American rideshare and micromobility company, while Grab is a diversified Southeast Asian super-app combining ride-hailing with food delivery and financial services across multiple countries.
LYFT offers focused exposure to North American rideshare market dynamics and improving free cash flow, while GRAB offers exposure to diversified Southeast Asian super-app growth across mobility, delivery, and fintech. The decision depends on whether you prefer a focused single-market rideshare business or diversified emerging-market super-app exposure.
LYFT holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. LYFT leads on both 1-year return (-16.39%) and forward P/E quality (8.18x vs 22.23x for GRAB), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, GRAB is growing revenue faster (21.90%), while LYFT maintains the higher operating margin (2.58%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for GRAB (+89.84%) than for LYFT (+14.35%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want focused exposure to the North American ridesharing market
- Value continued efficiency initiatives supporting progress toward sustained free cash flow
- Believe concentrated geographic focus allows for deeper investment in core market service quality
- Prefer a single-business rideshare model over a diversified super-app
- Want diversified exposure to Southeast Asian mobility, delivery, and financial services
- Value a super-app model that creates multiple avenues for user engagement and monetization
- Believe long-term Southeast Asian market growth potential supports sustained expansion
- Are comfortable with a company still working toward sustained group-level profitability
| Metric | LYFT | GRAB |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 25.4 | 24.9 |
| AI ranki | #2685 | #2836 |
| Latest closei | $16.94 | $2.79 |
| 1M returni | +14.69% | -12.81% |
| 3M returni | +19.30% | -15.71% |
| 6M returni | +18.96% | -28.46% |
| 1Y returni | -16.39% | -51.22% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | LYFT | GRAB |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $8.24K (-17.6%) started 2025-10-23 | $4.88K (-51.2%) started 2025-10-23 |
| 5Y ago | $3.52K (-64.8%) started 2021-10-25 | $2.18K (-78.2%) started 2021-10-25 |
| 10Y ago | $2.16K (-78.4%) started 2019-03-29 | $2.35K (-76.5%) started 2020-12-01 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | LYFT | GRAB |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $6.56B | $12.03B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 2.52 | 26.73 |
| Forward P/Ei | 8.18 | 22.23 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 0.86 | 2.13 |
| Analyst targeti | $19.82 | $5.58 |
| Target upsidei | +14.35% | +89.84% |
| Metric | LYFT | GRAB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 16.10% | 21.90% |
| Earnings growthi | 34.50% | N/A |
| EPS growthi | +34.50% | N/A |
| FCF margini | +17.03% | +13.47% |
| Operating margini | 2.58% | 2.10% |
| Profit margini | 42.32% | 16.03% |
| ROIC proxyi | 152.58% | 7.74% |
| Return on equityi | 152.58% | 7.74% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 0.00% |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 1.83 | 0.91 |
| Debt/equityi | 42.74 | 28.22 |
| Current ratioi | 0.59 | 1.52 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.44 | 1.23 |
Over the past year, LYFT and GRAB have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.44), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | LYFT | GRAB |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -17.65% | -51.22% |
| CAGRi | -17.67% | -51.25% | |
| Volatilityi | 46.87% | 38.30% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.27 | -1.81 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.36 | -2.43 | |
| Max drawdowni | 48.51% | 54.41% | |
| Current drawdowni | 31.05% | 54.41% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 32.81% | 34.11% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 35.19% | 36.62% | |
| Max daily dropi | 16.97% | 6.46% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 19.93% | 14.73% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -64.80% | -78.20% |
| CAGRi | -18.87% | -26.29% | |
| Volatilityi | 67.37% | 60.03% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.04 | -0.28 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.05 | -0.39 | |
| Max drawdowni | 85.80% | 86.46% | |
| Current drawdowni | 69.89% | 83.65% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 69.59% | 75.69% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 71.40% | 76.53% | |
| Max daily dropi | 36.44% | 37.28% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 40.92% | 42.07% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -78.36% | -76.53% |
| CAGRi | -18.31% | -21.81% | |
| Volatilityi | 67.09% | 59.42% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.03 | -0.19 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.05 | -0.27 | |
| Max drawdowni | 89.79% | 86.46% | |
| Current drawdowni | 78.36% | 83.65% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 65.45% | 68.14% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 69.04% | 71.34% | |
| Max daily dropi | 36.44% | 37.28% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 44.67% | 42.07% |
| Category | LYFT | GRAB |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Lyft, Inc. | Grab Holdings Limited |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Core business | A ridesharing company operating a transportation network primarily in the United States and Canada, connecting drivers with riders through its mobile app alongside bike and scooter sharing services. | A Southeast Asian super-app providing ride-hailing, food and grocery delivery, and digital financial services across multiple countries in the region. |
| Investor focus | Rideshare volume and active rider growth, driver supply and pricing dynamics, and progress toward sustained free cash flow generation. | Gross merchandise value growth across its mobility, delivery, and financial services segments, path to sustained group-level profitability, and market share trends across its Southeast Asian markets. |
- Established brand recognition and market position within the North American ridesharing duopoly support a stable base of active riders
- Focused geographic footprint allows concentrated investment in service quality and driver supply within core North American markets
- Continued efficiency initiatives have supported progress toward sustained free cash flow generation in recent periods
- Super-app model combining mobility, delivery, and financial services creates multiple avenues for user engagement and monetization
- Leading market position across many Southeast Asian countries provides scale advantages in a region with substantial long-term growth potential
- Diversification across ride-hailing, delivery, and fintech services reduces reliance on any single business line for overall growth
- Concentrated exposure to the North American market limits geographic diversification relative to global ridesharing peers
- Faces intense competition from a larger, more diversified ridesharing competitor within its core North American market
- Rideshare demand can be sensitive to broader consumer discretionary spending and commuting pattern trends
- Operating across many Southeast Asian countries introduces varied regulatory, currency, and competitive dynamics by market
- Achieving sustained group-level profitability across all business segments alongside continued growth investment remains an ongoing focus
- Faces competition from both regional super-app rivals and global technology companies expanding into Southeast Asian markets
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on LYFT and GRAB. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside LYFT and GRAB, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.