CAG vs HAIN Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Conagra Brands and Hain Celestial both operate in packaged food, but Conagra is a larger, diversified conventional food company spanning frozen, snacks, and grocery, while Hain Celestial is a smaller, more focused natural and organic food specialist.
Conagra offers scale and diversification across conventional packaged food categories, while Hain Celestial offers a more concentrated bet on natural and organic consumer trends at a smaller scale. Consider whether you prefer Conagra's scale and diversification or Hain Celestial's natural and organic positioning.
CAG holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. CAG has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-19.38% vs -59.68%), though HAIN has the better forward P/E setup (7.24x vs 10.37x for CAG). CAG leads on both revenue growth (3.60%) and operating margin (13.77%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for HAIN (+77.50%) than for CAG (-10.62%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want exposure to a diversified conventional packaged food portfolio
- Believe scale in frozen foods supports efficient distribution and manufacturing
- Value a consistent dividend history
- Are comfortable with persistent private label competition across core categories
- Want concentrated exposure to natural and organic food consumer trends
- Believe long-term shifts toward health-focused eating support category growth
- Value brand differentiation from conventional packaged food peers
- Are comfortable with smaller scale and less consistent revenue growth than larger peers
| Metric | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 25.9 | 23.9 |
| AI ranki | #2674 | #3546 |
| Latest closei | $15.48 | $0.75 |
| 1M returni | +3.13% | +33.93% |
| 6M returni | -16.82% | +5.63% |
| 1Y returni | -19.38% | -59.68% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $8.17K (-18.3%) started 2025-09-04 | $4.03K (-59.7%) started 2025-09-04 |
| 5Y ago | $6.53K (-34.7%) started 2021-09-07 | $198.89 (-98.0%) started 2021-09-07 |
| 10Y ago | $8.11K (-18.9%) started 2016-09-06 | $203.69 (-98.0%) started 2016-09-06 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $7.7B | $67.5M |
| Trailing P/Ei | 10.03 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 10.37 | 7.24 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 0.05 |
| EV/Revenuei | 1.33 | 0.42 |
| Analyst targeti | $14.38 | $1.33 |
| Target upsidei | -10.62% | +77.50% |
| Metric | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 3.60% | -13.30% |
| Earnings growthi | 39.00% | N/A |
| EPS growthi | +39.00% | N/A |
| FCF margini | +7.61% | +8.46% |
| Operating margini | 13.77% | 2.58% |
| Profit margini | -16.98% | -35.47% |
| ROIC proxyi | -25.06% | -113.04% |
| Return on equityi | -25.06% | -113.04% |
| Dividend yieldi | 7.61% | 0.00% |
| Betai | -0.05 | 0.80 |
| Debt/equityi | 117.58 | 276.41 |
| Current ratioi | 0.90 | 0.52 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.28 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, CAG and HAIN have moved barely in the same direction (correlation of 0.10), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -18.27% | -59.68% |
| CAGRi | -18.29% | -59.70% | |
| Volatilityi | 30.36% | 94.67% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.66 | -0.53 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.92 | -0.77 | |
| Max drawdowni | 37.16% | 77.21% | |
| Current drawdowni | 22.68% | 65.12% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 17.07% | 55.16% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 20.20% | 57.74% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.08% | 24.65% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 14.09% | 32.26% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -45.14% | -98.01% |
| CAGRi | -11.33% | -54.38% | |
| Volatilityi | 24.23% | 66.59% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.56 | -0.90 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.75 | -1.18 | |
| Max drawdowni | 65.50% | 98.98% | |
| Current drawdowni | 57.55% | 98.44% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 25.37% | 72.83% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 31.72% | 77.52% | |
| Max daily dropi | 8.44% | 47.65% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 14.09% | 52.30% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -42.39% | -97.96% |
| CAGRi | -5.37% | -32.27% | |
| Volatilityi | 26.68% | 52.74% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.24 | -0.55 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.33 | -0.74 | |
| Max drawdowni | 65.50% | 98.98% | |
| Current drawdowni | 57.55% | 98.44% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 20.07% | 50.02% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 25.76% | 59.56% | |
| Max daily dropi | 16.53% | 47.65% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 27.75% | 52.30% |
| Category | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Conagra Brands, Inc. | The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. |
| Sector | Consumer Defensive | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Core business | A packaged food company with a diverse portfolio spanning frozen meals, snacks, and pantry staples sold primarily to North American grocery and foodservice customers. | A natural and organic food and personal care products company selling snacks, beverages, and grocery items positioned around health-focused and clean-label consumer trends. |
| Investor focus | Organic net sales trends across frozen, snacks, and grocery segments, and pricing actions relative to input cost inflation. | Organic revenue growth trends across its natural food portfolio, category-level performance in snacks and beverages, and progress on cost efficiency initiatives. |
- Diversified portfolio across frozen, snacks, and grocery categories spreads exposure across multiple consumer segments
- Scale in frozen foods supports efficient manufacturing and broad retail distribution
- Consistent dividend history reflects steady cash flow generation from its packaged food operations
- Positioning around natural and organic consumer trends aligns with long-term shifts toward health-focused eating
- Portfolio spans multiple categories including snacks, beverages, and grocery, providing some diversification
- Brand recognition in natural and organic categories provides differentiation from conventional packaged food peers
- Volume trends across several core categories have been pressured by value-seeking consumer behavior
- Private label competition remains persistent across frozen and grocery categories
- Input cost inflation for proteins and packaging can pressure margins between pricing cycles
- Smaller scale relative to larger conventional packaged food peers can limit negotiating leverage with retailers
- Revenue growth has been inconsistent across some of its natural food categories in recent periods
- Faces competition from both larger conventional food companies entering natural categories and smaller specialty brands
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.