CAG vs HAIN Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Conagra Brands and Hain Celestial both operate in packaged food, but Conagra is a larger, diversified conventional food company spanning frozen, snacks, and grocery, while Hain Celestial is a smaller, more focused natural and organic food specialist.
Conagra offers scale and diversification across conventional packaged food categories, while Hain Celestial offers a more concentrated bet on natural and organic consumer trends at a smaller scale. Consider whether you prefer Conagra's scale and diversification or Hain Celestial's natural and organic positioning.
CAG holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. CAG leads on both 1-year return (-20.34%) and forward P/E quality (10.37x vs -75.40x for HAIN), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. CAG leads on both revenue growth (3.60%) and operating margin (13.77%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for HAIN (+850.48%) than for CAG (-10.62%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want exposure to a diversified conventional packaged food portfolio
- Believe scale in frozen foods supports efficient distribution and manufacturing
- Value a consistent dividend history
- Are comfortable with persistent private label competition across core categories
- Want concentrated exposure to natural and organic food consumer trends
- Believe long-term shifts toward health-focused eating support category growth
- Value brand differentiation from conventional packaged food peers
- Are comfortable with smaller scale and less consistent revenue growth than larger peers
| Metric | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 25.9 | 23.1 |
| AI ranki | #2558 | #3668 |
| Latest closei | $14.57 | $0.15 |
| 1M returni | +1.75% | -69.84% |
| 3M returni | -4.40% | -70.43% |
| 6M returni | +3.19% | -83.78% |
| 1Y returni | -20.34% | -89.53% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $7.88K (-21.2%) started 2025-10-27 | $1.08K (-89.2%) started 2025-10-27 |
| 5Y ago | $6.25K (-37.5%) started 2021-10-27 | $33.78 (-99.7%) started 2021-10-26 |
| 10Y ago | $7.42K (-25.8%) started 2016-10-27 | $40.58 (-99.6%) started 2016-10-26 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $7.7B | $13.72M |
| Trailing P/Ei | 10.03 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 10.37 | -75.40 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 0.01 |
| EV/Revenuei | 1.33 | 0.42 |
| Analyst targeti | $14.38 | $1.43 |
| Target upsidei | -10.62% | +850.48% |
| Metric | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 3.60% | -27.60% |
| Earnings growthi | 39.00% | N/A |
| EPS growthi | +39.00% | N/A |
| FCF margini | +7.61% | +10.35% |
| Operating margini | 13.77% | -3.50% |
| Profit margini | -16.98% | -22.53% |
| ROIC proxyi | -25.06% | -96.83% |
| Return on equityi | -25.06% | -96.83% |
| Dividend yieldi | 7.61% | 0.00% |
| Payout ratioi | 79.55% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | N/A |
| Betai | -0.05 | 0.95 |
| Debt/equityi | 117.58 | 393.72 |
| Current ratioi | 0.90 | 0.50 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.28 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, CAG and HAIN have moved barely in the same direction (correlation of 0.02), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -21.24% | -89.23% |
| CAGRi | -21.31% | -89.31% | |
| Volatilityi | 31.80% | 109.44% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.74 | -1.47 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -1.03 | -1.87 | |
| Max drawdowni | 37.16% | 89.44% | |
| Current drawdowni | 27.22% | 89.38% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 19.39% | 43.47% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 22.43% | 47.51% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.08% | 51.72% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 14.09% | 65.52% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -47.47% | -99.66% |
| CAGRi | -12.09% | -67.96% | |
| Volatilityi | 24.76% | 72.31% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.58 | -1.24 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.78 | -1.56 | |
| Max drawdowni | 65.50% | 99.69% | |
| Current drawdowni | 60.05% | 99.69% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 26.92% | 75.57% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 33.30% | 79.26% | |
| Max daily dropi | 8.44% | 51.72% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 14.09% | 65.52% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -47.25% | -99.59% |
| CAGRi | -6.20% | -42.35% | |
| Volatilityi | 26.81% | 56.48% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.27 | -0.75 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.37 | -0.96 | |
| Max drawdowni | 65.50% | 99.69% | |
| Current drawdowni | 60.05% | 99.69% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 20.89% | 51.37% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 26.74% | 60.70% | |
| Max daily dropi | 16.53% | 51.72% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 27.75% | 65.52% |
| Category | CAG | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Conagra Brands, Inc. | The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. |
| Sector | Consumer Defensive | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Core business | A packaged food company with a diverse portfolio spanning frozen meals, snacks, and pantry staples sold primarily to North American grocery and foodservice customers. | A natural and organic food and personal care products company selling snacks, beverages, and grocery items positioned around health-focused and clean-label consumer trends. |
| Investor focus | Organic net sales trends across frozen, snacks, and grocery segments, and pricing actions relative to input cost inflation. | Organic revenue growth trends across its natural food portfolio, category-level performance in snacks and beverages, and progress on cost efficiency initiatives. |
- Diversified portfolio across frozen, snacks, and grocery categories spreads exposure across multiple consumer segments
- Scale in frozen foods supports efficient manufacturing and broad retail distribution
- Consistent dividend history reflects steady cash flow generation from its packaged food operations
- Positioning around natural and organic consumer trends aligns with long-term shifts toward health-focused eating
- Portfolio spans multiple categories including snacks, beverages, and grocery, providing some diversification
- Brand recognition in natural and organic categories provides differentiation from conventional packaged food peers
- Volume trends across several core categories have been pressured by value-seeking consumer behavior
- Private label competition remains persistent across frozen and grocery categories
- Input cost inflation for proteins and packaging can pressure margins between pricing cycles
- Smaller scale relative to larger conventional packaged food peers can limit negotiating leverage with retailers
- Revenue growth has been inconsistent across some of its natural food categories in recent periods
- Faces competition from both larger conventional food companies entering natural categories and smaller specialty brands
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on CAG and HAIN. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside CAG and HAIN, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.