PENN vs FLUT Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Penn Entertainment and Flutter Entertainment both compete in online sports betting, but Penn Entertainment is pursuing a turnaround built around its ESPN Bet digital platform alongside an established regional casino business, while Flutter is the globally diversified market leader through its FanDuel brand and international operations.
PENN offers a turnaround-oriented bet on ESPN Bet gaining meaningful US digital market share alongside stable regional casino cash flow, while FLUT offers exposure to the established global market leader with proven US and international profitability. The decision depends on whether you prefer turnaround potential or established market leadership.
PENN holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. PENN has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+2.71% vs -63.75%), though FLUT has the better forward P/E setup (11.50x vs 14.13x for PENN). PENN leads on both revenue growth (5.20%) and operating margin (7.93%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for FLUT (+63.71%) than for PENN (+44.43%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want turnaround exposure to the ESPN Bet digital sports betting platform
- Value a stable cash flow base from an established regional casino property network
- Believe cross-marketing between casino loyalty programs and digital betting can support customer acquisition
- Are comfortable with a digital segment still working toward sustainable market share and profitability
- Want exposure to the established global sports betting and gaming market leader
- Value leading US market share through FanDuel alongside profitable international operations
- Believe international cash flow can help fund continued US market growth investment
- Prefer established market leadership over turnaround-oriented digital betting exposure
| Metric | PENN | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 34.5 | 26.2 |
| AI ranki | #1891 | #2567 |
| Latest closei | $17.07 | $83.74 |
| 1M returni | +15.57% | +11.94% |
| 3M returni | -14.82% | -20.22% |
| 6M returni | -0.18% | -18.96% |
| 1Y returni | +2.71% | -63.75% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | PENN | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $10.55K (+5.5%) started 2025-11-04 | $3.77K (-62.3%) started 2025-11-04 |
| 5Y ago | $2.97K (-70.3%) started 2021-11-04 | $4.82K (-51.8%) started 2021-11-04 |
| 10Y ago | $14.08K (+40.8%) started 2016-11-04 | $7.31K (-26.9%) started 2016-11-04 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | PENN | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $2.27B | $13.9B |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 14.13 | 11.50 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 1.71 | 1.48 |
| Analyst targeti | $24.39 | $131.12 |
| Target upsidei | +44.43% | +63.71% |
| Metric | PENN | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 5.20% | 3.30% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | -0.76% | -5.77% |
| Operating margini | 7.93% | -3.33% |
| Profit margini | -12.66% | -4.39% |
| ROIC proxyi | -37.58% | -7.87% |
| Return on equityi | -37.58% | -7.87% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 0.00% |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 1.41 | 1.14 |
| Debt/equityi | 596.73 | 134.48 |
| Current ratioi | 0.89 | 0.89 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.76 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, PENN and FLUT have moved weakly in the same direction (correlation of 0.40), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | PENN | FLUT |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +5.50% | -62.28% |
| CAGRi | +5.51% | -62.35% | |
| Volatilityi | 54.17% | 49.77% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.28 | -1.82 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.46 | -2.26 | |
| Max drawdowni | 34.27% | 68.33% | |
| Current drawdowni | 22.62% | 64.28% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 13.23% | 45.51% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 16.08% | 49.84% | |
| Max daily dropi | 10.40% | 14.27% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 12.50% | 19.80% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -70.26% | -51.78% |
| CAGRi | -21.54% | -13.58% | |
| Volatilityi | 53.12% | 45.33% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.28 | -0.20 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.41 | -0.27 | |
| Max drawdowni | 80.96% | 75.94% | |
| Current drawdowni | 72.36% | 72.86% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 60.78% | 23.94% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 62.74% | 32.12% | |
| Max daily dropi | 13.82% | 14.27% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 26.18% | 26.19% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +40.84% | -26.88% |
| CAGRi | +3.48% | -3.08% | |
| Volatilityi | 61.84% | 41.68% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.30 | 0.03 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.44 | 0.04 | |
| Max drawdowni | 91.38% | 75.94% | |
| Current drawdowni | 87.49% | 72.86% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 52.10% | 23.58% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 61.98% | 30.36% | |
| Max daily dropi | 44.80% | 21.58% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 77.18% | 28.44% |
| Category | PENN | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Penn Entertainment, Inc. | Flutter Entertainment plc |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Resorts & Casinos | Gambling |
| Core business | A regional casino operator that has expanded into online sports betting and iGaming through its ESPN Bet branded digital platform, alongside its network of physical casino and racing properties. | A global sports betting and gaming company operating multiple brands worldwide, including FanDuel in the United States, providing sports betting, iGaming, and daily fantasy sports products across many international markets. |
| Investor focus | ESPN Bet market share and customer acquisition progress in online sports betting, retail casino segment cash flow stability, and overall path toward digital segment profitability. | US market share and profitability through its FanDuel brand, international market diversification and profitability, and overall group-level margin trends. |
- Established network of regional casino properties provides a stable base of cash flow to help fund digital segment investment
- Partnership branding around ESPN Bet provides significant marketing reach and brand recognition for its online betting platform
- Cross-marketing opportunities between physical casino loyalty programs and digital betting products support customer acquisition
- Global diversification across multiple established international markets reduces reliance on any single country's regulatory or competitive environment
- Leading US market share position through its FanDuel brand provides strong exposure to the growing US online betting market
- Established, profitable international operations provide a source of cash flow to help fund US market growth investment
- Digital sports betting segment has required substantial investment and continues working to establish sustainable market share and profitability
- Faces intense competition from more established online sports betting operators with larger existing market share
- Retail casino segment faces its own competitive and regional economic considerations separate from the digital betting business
- Managing a portfolio of brands across many international markets adds operational complexity relative to a single-market operator
- US segment profitability depends on continued market share retention amid intense competitive promotional spending
- Faces varied regulatory environments and tax structures across its many international betting and gaming markets
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on PENN and FLUT. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside PENN and FLUT, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.