CACI vs LDOS Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
CACI International and Leidos are both major United States government services and technology contractors, but CACI concentrates more heavily on specialized defense and intelligence community work, while Leidos maintains a broader, more diversified customer base spanning defense, civil, and health agencies.
CACI offers concentrated exposure to specialized defense and intelligence community technology contracts, while Leidos offers diversified exposure across defense, civil, and health government segments. Consider whether you prefer CACI's specialized concentration or Leidos's broader government services diversification.
CACI holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. CACI has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+32.84% vs -25.13%), though LDOS has the better forward P/E setup (11.00x vs 16.54x for CACI). On fundamentals, CACI is growing revenue faster (17.60%), while LDOS maintains the higher operating margin (11.72%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for CACI (+17.97%) than for LDOS (+11.33%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want concentrated exposure to specialized defense and intelligence community technology contracts
- Believe deep, long-standing government customer relationships support durable contract renewal rates
- Value consistent contract backlog growth providing multi-year revenue visibility
- Are comfortable with revenue concentration in United States federal defense and intelligence spending
- Prefer diversified exposure across defense, civil, and health government customer segments
- Believe scale and broad technology capabilities support participation in large complex government programs
- Value reduced reliance on any single government agency or program type
- Are comfortable with a portfolio spanning both higher and lower margin government services segments
| Metric | CACI | LDOS |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 50.2 | 46.1 |
| AI ranki | #519 | #712 |
| Latest closei | $623.61 | $133.05 |
| 1M returni | +20.38% | +4.89% |
| 6M returni | +1.81% | -24.26% |
| 1Y returni | +32.84% | -25.13% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | CACI | LDOS |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $13.55K (+35.5%) started 2025-09-04 | $7.45K (-25.5%) started 2025-09-04 |
| 5Y ago | $24.72K (+147.2%) started 2021-09-07 | $15.11K (+51.1%) started 2021-09-07 |
| 10Y ago | $61.87K (+518.7%) started 2016-09-06 | $43.31K (+333.1%) started 2016-09-06 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | CACI | LDOS |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $13.77B | $17.65B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 25.79 | 13.15 |
| Forward P/Ei | 16.54 | 11.00 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 2.00 | 1.33 |
| Analyst targeti | $735.21 | $156.60 |
| Target upsidei | +17.97% | +11.33% |
| Metric | CACI | LDOS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 17.60% | 7.20% |
| Earnings growthi | -1.20% | -6.70% |
| EPS growthi | -1.20% | -6.70% |
| FCF margini | +6.38% | +6.50% |
| Operating margini | 10.05% | 11.72% |
| Profit margini | 5.60% | 7.80% |
| ROIC proxyi | 12.82% | 27.78% |
| Return on equityi | 12.82% | 27.78% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 1.22% |
| Betai | 0.54 | 0.55 |
| Debt/equityi | 120.66 | 123.28 |
| Current ratioi | 1.48 | 1.63 |
| Quick ratioi | 1.25 | 1.15 |
Over the past year, CACI and LDOS have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.64), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | CACI | LDOS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +35.54% | -25.50% |
| CAGRi | +35.60% | -25.53% | |
| Volatilityi | 40.95% | 34.08% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.83 | -0.82 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.46 | -1.10 | |
| Max drawdowni | 33.44% | 49.89% | |
| Current drawdowni | 8.30% | 33.32% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 11.54% | 18.85% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 15.34% | 24.69% | |
| Max daily dropi | 8.46% | 11.15% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 13.42% | 16.99% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +147.23% | +43.35% |
| CAGRi | +19.88% | +7.48% | |
| Volatilityi | 29.71% | 27.59% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.61 | 0.24 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.93 | 0.33 | |
| Max drawdowni | 42.88% | 50.06% | |
| Current drawdowni | 8.30% | 33.56% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 9.80% | 12.82% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 13.67% | 17.24% | |
| Max daily dropi | 9.41% | 14.54% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.74% | 21.35% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +518.66% | +270.48% |
| CAGRi | +20.01% | +14.00% | |
| Volatilityi | 29.21% | 27.89% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.62 | 0.45 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.92 | 0.63 | |
| Max drawdowni | 42.88% | 50.06% | |
| Current drawdowni | 8.30% | 33.56% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 9.39% | 13.02% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 12.90% | 16.87% | |
| Max daily dropi | 13.86% | 14.54% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 23.18% | 21.35% |
| Category | CACI | LDOS |
|---|---|---|
| Company | CACI International Inc | Leidos Holdings, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Core business | A government services and information technology company providing intelligence, cybersecurity, and technology solutions primarily to United States defense and intelligence community customers. | A science and technology company providing information technology, engineering, and mission solutions across defense, intelligence, civil, and health government customer segments. |
| Investor focus | Contract backlog growth, organic revenue growth rate, and win rates on classified and intelligence-related program recompetes and new awards. | Diversification across defense, civil, and health customer segments, contract backlog growth, and margin trends across the broader portfolio. |
- Deep relationships with defense and intelligence community customers support recurring, mission-critical contract revenue
- Specialized technology and intelligence services capabilities create differentiation versus broader IT services competitors
- Consistent contract backlog growth provides multi-year revenue visibility
- Diversified customer base spanning defense, intelligence, civil government, and health segments reduces reliance on any single agency
- Scale and broad technology capabilities support participation in large, complex, multi-year government programs
- Established position across both classified defense work and civilian agency technology modernization contracts
- Revenue concentration in United States government contracts creates exposure to federal budget and continuing resolution dynamics
- Contract recompete cycles introduce periodic win-or-lose risk on individual large programs
- Classified program mix limits public visibility into portions of the company's revenue drivers
- Revenue remains concentrated in United States government spending, creating exposure to budget and policy shifts
- Large, diversified contract portfolio can include lower-margin segments alongside higher-margin specialized work
- Competition for government technology contracts includes numerous other established services providers
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.