GE vs RTX Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
GE Aerospace is a focused, high-margin commercial engine and services business, while RTX offers broader diversification across commercial aerospace, defense electronics, and missile systems.
Investors choosing between GE and RTX are weighing a pure-play commercial engine leader against a more diversified aerospace and defense conglomerate with greater government exposure.
GE holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. RTX leads on both 1-year return (+34.05%) and forward P/E quality (28.39x vs 40.59x for GE), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. GE leads on both revenue growth (21.10%) and operating margin (20.57%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for GE (+9.91%) than for RTX (+4.17%).
- Want concentrated exposure to commercial jet engine growth
- Value high-margin, recurring aftermarket services revenue
- Prefer a focused pure-play aerospace business model
- Are comfortable with cyclicality tied to aircraft production rates
- Want diversification across commercial and defense end markets
- Seek exposure to growing global defense and missile spending
- Are comfortable with the complexity of a multi-segment conglomerate
- Can tolerate near-term costs from engine remediation programs
| Metric | GE | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 52.0 | 49.9 |
| AI rank | #350 | #466 |
| Latest close | $348.37 | $209.91 |
| 1M return | +2.10% | +7.71% |
| 6M return | +4.07% | +2.19% |
| 1Y return | +30.75% | +34.05% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | GE | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.96K (+29.6%) started 2025-08-21 | $13.43K (+34.3%) started 2025-08-21 |
| 5Y ago | $57.36K (+473.6%) started 2021-08-23 | $29.27K (+192.7%) started 2021-08-23 |
| 10Y ago | $28.75K (+187.5%) started 2016-08-22 | $47.19K (+371.9%) started 2016-08-22 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | GE | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $382.22B | $300.51B |
| Trailing P/E | 43.49 | 39.19 |
| Forward P/E | 40.59 | 28.39 |
| Price/Sales | 6.87 | 2.27 |
| EV/Revenue | 7.75 | 3.56 |
| Analyst target | $404.90 | $232.27 |
| Target upside | +9.91% | +4.17% |
| Metric | GE | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 21.10% | 14.50% |
| Earnings growth | 19.40% | 28.70% |
| EPS growth | +19.40% | +28.70% |
| FCF margin | +13.02% | +10.57% |
| Operating margin | 20.57% | 12.70% |
| Profit margin | 17.72% | 8.28% |
| ROIC proxy | 48.23% | 12.27% |
| Return on equity | 48.23% | 12.27% |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 1.31% |
| Beta | 1.37 | 0.29 |
| Debt/equity | 113.22 | 57.02 |
| Current ratio | 0.98 | 1.01 |
| Quick ratio | 0.63 | 0.65 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | GE | RTX |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +29.65% | +34.28% |
| CAGR | +29.69% | +34.34% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.82 | 1.09 | |
| Max drawdown | 20.97% | 19.32% | |
| Max daily drop | 7.38% | 4.40% | |
| Max wkly drop | 11.99% | 11.45% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +463.51% | +168.50% |
| CAGR | +41.36% | +21.86% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.13 | 0.75 | |
| Max drawdown | 44.94% | 32.84% | |
| Max daily drop | 11.10% | 10.22% | |
| Max wkly drop | 16.89% | 12.34% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +157.62% | +276.84% |
| CAGR | +9.93% | +14.19% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.32 | 0.46 | |
| Max drawdown | 80.94% | 51.98% | |
| Max daily drop | 15.16% | 14.48% | |
| Max wkly drop | 28.20% | 26.15% |
| Category | GE | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Company | GE Aerospace | RTX Corporation |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Core business | GE Aerospace designs and manufactures jet engines for commercial and military aircraft, and generates significant revenue from long-term engine servicing and maintenance contracts. | RTX combines Collins Aerospace avionics and systems, Pratt & Whitney jet engines, and Raytheon missile and defense electronics under one parent company. |
| Investor focus | Watch commercial engine delivery volumes, aftermarket services growth, and narrowbody engine demand from Boeing and Airbus programs. | Watch Pratt & Whitney engine durability and remediation costs, defense order backlog, and commercial aftermarket recovery. |
- Leading position in commercial jet engines through its CFM joint venture
- High-margin, recurring aftermarket services revenue tied to a large installed engine base
- Focused pure-play aerospace structure following its corporate breakup
- Diversified mix across commercial aerospace and government defense spending
- Large, growing backlog across missile systems and defense electronics
- Broad portfolio reduces dependence on any single aircraft program
- Engine deliveries remain sensitive to Boeing and Airbus production rates
- Supply chain constraints have periodically limited output growth
- Long product cycles mean engine investments take years to pay off
- Pratt & Whitney has faced costly engine inspection and remediation issues
- Defense revenue depends on government budget cycles and program timing
- Integration of multiple large legacy businesses adds complexity
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.