KMI vs EPD Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Kinder Morgan and Enterprise Products Partners are both major midstream energy infrastructure operators focused on generating income for investors, but Kinder Morgan operates as a standard corporation with a simpler tax structure, while Enterprise Products Partners operates as a master limited partnership with a long track record of distribution payments and strong coverage.
Kinder Morgan offers midstream income exposure through a standard corporate dividend structure that simplifies tax reporting, while Enterprise Products Partners offers a long-tenured distribution track record with strong coverage through a partnership structure that generates a K-1 tax form. Consider whether you prefer simpler dividend tax treatment or Enterprise's distribution coverage track record.
EPD holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. EPD leads on both 1-year return (+30.27%) and forward P/E quality (11.81x vs 20.52x for KMI), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, EPD is growing revenue faster (49.30%), while KMI maintains the higher operating margin (30.06%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies similar upside for both: +13.46% for KMI and +11.11% for EPD.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want midstream income exposure through a standard corporate dividend structure
- Value simpler tax reporting compared to master limited partnership K-1 forms
- Believe rising natural gas demand supports long-term infrastructure growth
- Value a diversified pipeline portfolio spanning natural gas, refined products, and crude oil
- Want exposure to a long-tenured distribution track record with strong coverage
- Are comfortable managing a K-1 tax form in exchange for partnership-level income
- Value diversified natural gas liquids, crude oil, and natural gas infrastructure exposure
- Prefer a conservative, disciplined approach to partnership capital management
| Metric | KMI | EPD |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 53.0 | 57.1 |
| AI ranki | #335 | #796 |
| Latest closei | $32.87 | $37.50 |
| 1M returni | +5.79% | +5.16% |
| 3M returni | +4.75% | -0.20% |
| 6M returni | +1.80% | +0.29% |
| 1Y returni | +26.04% | +30.27% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | KMI | EPD |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.72K (+27.2%) started 2025-11-04 | $13.85K (+38.5%) started 2025-11-03 |
| 5Y ago | $30.18K (+201.8%) started 2021-11-04 | $35.96K (+259.6%) started 2021-11-04 |
| 10Y ago | $46.15K (+361.5%) started 2016-11-04 | $85.61K (+756.1%) started 2016-11-04 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | KMI | EPD |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $70.28B | $80.98B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 20.36 | 12.38 |
| Forward P/Ei | 20.52 | 11.81 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 1.26 |
| EV/Revenuei | 5.78 | 1.80 |
| Analyst targeti | $35.81 | $41.67 |
| Target upsidei | +13.46% | +11.11% |
| Metric | KMI | EPD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 10.80% | 49.30% |
| Earnings growthi | 21.20% | 21.60% |
| EPS growthi | +21.20% | +21.60% |
| FCF margini | +5.99% | N/A |
| Operating margini | 30.06% | 10.64% |
| Profit margini | 19.30% | 10.24% |
| ROIC proxyi | 10.99% | N/A |
| Return on equityi | 10.99% | N/A |
| Dividend yieldi | 3.74% | 5.99% |
| Payout ratioi | 72.84% | 76.04% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | 10 yrs |
| Betai | 0.55 | 0.46 |
| Debt/equityi | 98.62 | 109.97 |
| Current ratioi | 0.46 | N/A |
| Quick ratioi | 0.29 | N/A |
Over the past year, KMI and EPD have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.54), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | KMI | EPD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +27.21% | +30.27% |
| CAGRi | +27.27% | +30.29% | |
| Volatilityi | 21.52% | 18.58% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.04 | 1.28 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.54 | 2.01 | |
| Max drawdowni | 12.12% | 9.63% | |
| Current drawdowni | 4.53% | 3.34% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 4.26% | 2.93% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 5.38% | 3.93% | |
| Max daily dropi | 3.87% | 3.17% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 8.70% | 6.79% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +140.85% | +137.53% |
| CAGRi | +19.22% | +18.90% | |
| Volatilityi | 22.40% | 17.09% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.70 | 0.84 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.99 | 1.19 | |
| Max drawdowni | 20.31% | 18.06% | |
| Current drawdowni | 4.53% | 3.34% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.58% | 3.80% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 8.03% | 5.27% | |
| Max daily dropi | 9.28% | 7.83% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 15.66% | 15.10% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +160.61% | +210.56% |
| CAGRi | +10.05% | +12.00% | |
| Volatilityi | 27.42% | 24.07% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.33 | 0.41 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.45 | 0.57 | |
| Max drawdowni | 55.13% | 58.04% | |
| Current drawdowni | 4.53% | 3.34% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 12.24% | 8.09% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 15.86% | 12.86% | |
| Max daily dropi | 21.04% | 18.60% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 35.61% | 39.75% |
| Category | KMI | EPD |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Kinder Morgan, Inc. | Enterprise Products Partners L.P. |
| Sector | Energy | Midstream |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Core business | A large midstream energy infrastructure company that owns and operates an extensive network of natural gas, refined products, and crude oil pipelines and storage terminals across North America, structured as a standard corporation. | A large master limited partnership operating natural gas liquids, crude oil, and natural gas pipelines, processing, storage, and export terminal infrastructure across the United States, with a long track record of distribution payments. |
| Investor focus | Natural gas pipeline throughput volumes, dividend coverage and growth trends, and progress on new infrastructure expansion projects tied to rising gas demand. | Distribution coverage ratio strength, natural gas liquids export terminal volumes, and growth project returns as the partnership continues expanding its infrastructure footprint. |
- Extensive, diversified pipeline and storage network across natural gas, refined products, and crude oil provides broad infrastructure exposure
- Fee-based, take-or-pay contract structures on much of its pipeline capacity support relatively stable, predictable cash flows
- Corporate structure with a standard dividend simplifies tax reporting for shareholders compared to partnership structures
- Long track record of consistent distribution payments reflects a disciplined, conservative approach to partnership capital management
- Strong distribution coverage ratio provides a cushion that supports distribution sustainability even during commodity price downturns
- Diversified infrastructure spanning natural gas liquids, crude oil, and natural gas provides exposure across multiple midstream value chains
- Growth projects require significant capital investment and face permitting and regulatory approval risk before generating returns
- Elevated debt levels typical of pipeline infrastructure companies require disciplined balance sheet management
- Long-term demand for certain fossil fuel infrastructure assets faces uncertainty amid the broader energy transition
- Master limited partnership structure generates a K-1 tax form for investors, which can complicate tax reporting compared to standard corporate dividends
- Growth capital spending requires ongoing access to capital markets, which can be affected by broader interest rate and credit conditions
- Results remain tied to natural gas liquids and crude oil production trends in key US supply basins
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on KMI and EPD. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside KMI and EPD, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.