RH vs W Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
RH targets the high-end luxury home furnishings customer through branded galleries and hospitality experiences, while Wayfair operates a broad, asset-light online marketplace spanning a wide range of price points. RH's fortunes are closely tied to high-end housing and consumer spending along with the returns on its capital-intensive gallery strategy, while Wayfair's story centers on achieving sustained profitability at scale in a highly competitive online retail category. The choice depends on whether an investor prefers a premium branded retail model or a scaled, asset-light e-commerce platform.
Use this comparison to weigh a premium, brand-driven luxury retail model with housing market sensitivity (RH) against a scaled, asset-light online marketplace still working toward consistent profitability (Wayfair).
W holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. W has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+37.66% vs -33.24%), though RH has the better forward P/E setup (16.26x vs 24.41x for W). W leads on both revenue growth (7.50%) and operating margin (3.01%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for W (+30.43%) than for RH (+20.57%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want exposure to the luxury end of the home furnishings market
- Value strong brand positioning and pricing power over broad market share
- Are comfortable with sensitivity to housing market and high-end consumer spending cycles
- Accept elevated debt levels tied to buybacks and gallery expansion
- Want broad exposure to online home goods shopping across price points
- Value an asset-light marketplace model over owned inventory and physical retail
- Are comfortable with a company still working toward consistent profitability
- Believe continued cost discipline can sustainably improve margins over time
| Metric | RH | W |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 39.2 | 49.1 |
| AI ranki | #1170 | #533 |
| Latest closei | $117.87 | $111.93 |
| 1M returni | -5.58% | +7.95% |
| 3M returni | -37.70% | +22.35% |
| 6M returni | -8.97% | +44.78% |
| 1Y returni | -33.24% | +37.66% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | RH | W |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $6.69K (-33.1%) started 2025-10-16 | $13.46K (+34.6%) started 2025-10-16 |
| 5Y ago | $1.71K (-82.9%) started 2021-10-18 | $4.62K (-53.8%) started 2021-10-18 |
| 10Y ago | $39.58K (+295.8%) started 2016-10-17 | $31.33K (+213.3%) started 2016-10-17 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | RH | W |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $2.8B | $12.95B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 28.45 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 16.26 | 24.41 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 1.97 | 1.19 |
| Analyst targeti | $178.06 | $123.31 |
| Target upsidei | +20.57% | +30.43% |
| Metric | RH | W |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | -1.70% | 7.50% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | +8.33% | +3.65% |
| Operating margini | 0.32% | 3.01% |
| Profit margini | 3.01% | -2.49% |
| ROIC proxyi | N/A | N/A |
| Return on equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 1.87 | 2.98 |
| Debt/equityi | 7060.08 | N/A |
| Current ratioi | 1.13 | 0.74 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.20 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, RH and W have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.47), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | RH | W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -33.09% | +34.56% |
| CAGRi | -33.13% | +34.63% | |
| Volatilityi | 60.01% | 71.69% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.44 | 0.70 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.62 | 1.18 | |
| Max drawdowni | 52.34% | 51.78% | |
| Current drawdowni | 49.39% | 5.98% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 28.20% | 21.67% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 32.16% | 25.88% | |
| Max daily dropi | 19.29% | 13.02% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 20.23% | 17.81% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -82.91% | -53.81% |
| CAGRi | -29.80% | -14.33% | |
| Volatilityi | 62.59% | 81.75% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.32 | 0.16 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.45 | 0.24 | |
| Max drawdowni | 83.91% | 91.36% | |
| Current drawdowni | 82.91% | 59.93% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 60.31% | 73.99% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 62.19% | 75.79% | |
| Max daily dropi | 40.09% | 25.68% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 38.63% | 42.03% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +295.80% | +213.27% |
| CAGRi | +14.76% | +12.10% | |
| Volatilityi | 64.10% | 75.68% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.46 | 0.46 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.71 | 0.71 | |
| Max drawdowni | 84.97% | 93.01% | |
| Current drawdowni | 84.04% | 67.60% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 37.95% | 48.20% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 47.45% | 59.07% | |
| Max daily dropi | 40.09% | 26.68% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 38.63% | 45.34% |
| Category | RH | W |
|---|---|---|
| Company | RH | Wayfair Inc. |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Internet Retail |
| Core business | RH designs and sells luxury home furnishings through its branded galleries, showrooms, and hospitality experiences, positioning itself as a premium lifestyle brand rather than a conventional retailer. | Wayfair operates an e-commerce platform selling home goods and furniture across a wide range of price points, relying on a large supplier network and logistics infrastructure rather than owned inventory for most products. |
| Investor focus | Investors watch demand trends among high-end consumers, the return on its capital-intensive gallery expansion strategy, and margin trends amid a soft luxury housing-related spending environment. | Investors focus on active customer growth, order frequency, advertising and logistics cost efficiency, and progress toward sustained profitability after years of losses. |
- Strong luxury brand positioning commands premium pricing relative to mainstream furniture retailers
- Gallery and hospitality concept differentiates the shopping experience and drives customer engagement
- International expansion provides a long-term growth avenue beyond its core U.S. market
- Large online marketplace scale and broad product selection across a wide range of price points
- Asset-light, drop-ship-heavy supplier model limits inventory risk relative to traditional furniture retailers
- Ongoing cost discipline efforts have improved margins and cash flow from prior years
- High sensitivity to housing market activity and high-end consumer discretionary spending
- Capital-intensive gallery expansion carries execution and return-on-investment risk
- Elevated debt levels used to fund share buybacks and expansion add financial risk during downturns
- History of inconsistent profitability makes sustained positive earnings an ongoing question mark
- Highly competitive online home goods market with pressure from big-box and marketplace retailers
- Revenue growth has slowed from earlier pandemic-driven online shopping highs
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on RH and W. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside RH and W, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.