UEC vs LTBR Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Uranium Energy Corp is generally evaluated as a direct producer with revenue tied to uranium mining output and commodity prices, while Lightbridge is assessed as a pre-revenue technology developer whose value depends on successfully qualifying its advanced fuel design. The comparison contrasts a commodity-exposed producer against a speculative, technology-driven nuclear fuel innovator.
Use this comparison to weigh Uranium Energy Corp's direct commodity production exposure against Lightbridge's higher-risk, technology-development path in advanced nuclear fuel.
UEC holds the edge across 2 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. UEC has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+14.50% vs -50.23% for LTBR).
- Want direct exposure to uranium prices and U.S. production growth
- Believe nuclear power demand will continue expanding globally
- Are comfortable with commodity price cyclicality
- Value a company with active production rather than pre-revenue development
- Are comfortable with pre-revenue, technology-development risk
- Believe advanced fuel designs could meaningfully improve reactor economics
- Want a smaller, higher-risk, higher-potential-reward nuclear technology bet
- Value a strong cash position supporting a multi-year development runway
| Metric | UEC | LTBR |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 47.6 | 21.5 |
| AI rank | #584 | #4724 |
| Latest close | $12.24 | $7.53 |
| 1M return | +27.50% | -8.62% |
| 6M return | -20.16% | -41.76% |
| 1Y return | +14.50% | -50.23% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | UEC | LTBR |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $11.15K (+11.5%) started 2025-09-02 | $4.98K (-50.2%) started 2025-09-02 |
| 5Y ago | $48.76K (+387.6%) started 2021-08-31 | $11.99K (+19.9%) started 2021-08-31 |
| 10Y ago | $121.19K (+1111.9%) started 2016-08-31 | $2.48K (-75.2%) started 2016-08-31 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | UEC | LTBR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $6.06B | $282.06M |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/E | -136.00 | N/A |
| Price/Sales | 299.86 | 1852.09 |
| EV/Revenue | 279.72 | N/A |
| Analyst target | $18.03 | N/A |
| Target upside | +47.29% | N/A |
| Metric | UEC | LTBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | N/A | N/A |
| Earnings growth | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growth | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margin | -406.27% | N/A |
| Operating margin | -629.66% | 0.00% |
| Profit margin | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| ROIC proxy | -8.96% | -13.91% |
| Return on equity | -8.96% | -13.91% |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Beta | 1.21 | 2.18 |
| Debt/equity | 0.14 | N/A |
| Current ratio | 32.67 | 116.56 |
| Quick ratio | 27.41 | 116.06 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | UEC | LTBR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +11.48% | -50.23% |
| CAGR | +11.55% | -50.45% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.48 | -0.34 | |
| Max drawdown | 55.11% | 74.03% | |
| Max daily drop | 15.54% | 22.42% | |
| Max wkly drop | 33.14% | 35.10% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +387.65% | +19.90% |
| CAGR | +37.29% | +3.70% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.74 | 0.51 | |
| Max drawdown | 63.76% | 83.72% | |
| Max daily drop | 17.34% | 25.51% | |
| Max wkly drop | 33.14% | 35.79% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +1111.88% | -75.20% |
| CAGR | +28.34% | -13.02% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.64 | 0.32 | |
| Max drawdown | 80.81% | 95.63% | |
| Max daily drop | 25.69% | 26.90% | |
| Max wkly drop | 43.28% | 41.92% |
| Category | UEC | LTBR |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Uranium Energy Corp | Lightbridge Corporation |
| Sector | Uranium Mining | Nuclear Fuel Technology |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | Uranium Energy Corp explores, develops, and produces uranium through in-situ recovery mining operations primarily in the United States, alongside physical uranium holdings. | Lightbridge is developing an advanced nuclear fuel technology designed to improve the economics, safety, and proliferation resistance of current and future nuclear reactors. |
| Investor focus | Investors track uranium spot and contract prices, production ramp-up at U.S. facilities, and the company's physical uranium inventory strategy. | Investors watch progress on fuel irradiation testing, partnership and licensing agreements, and the path toward commercial fuel qualification and deployment. |
- Positioned as a leading U.S.-based uranium producer amid supply security concerns
- Growing production capacity as nuclear power demand expectations rise
- Physical uranium holdings provide direct commodity price exposure
- Differentiated fuel technology with potential efficiency and safety advantages
- Strong cash position relative to its development-stage spending needs
- Growing partnership network including HALEU supply agreements
- Uranium prices are volatile and cyclical, directly impacting revenue and margins
- Execution risk in scaling production to meet growth targets
- Regulatory and permitting timelines for mining operations
- Pre-revenue company dependent on successful technology development and qualification
- Long regulatory and testing timelines before commercial deployment
- Execution risk inherent in novel nuclear fuel technology development
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.